DROPLETS
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed 'Regulation Crypto Assets,' a new framework creating tailored offering exemptions and a safe harbor for digital asset investment contracts.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a new framework intended to create a viable compliance path for cryptoasset offerings. The proposal, enjoying unified support from the commissioners, marks a significant shift from the prior administration's enforcement-led approach. It introduces two tailored offering exemptions: a "Startup Exemption" for raises up to $5 million and a tiered "Fundraising Exemption," modeled on Regulation A, for raises up to $75 million annually. It also establishes a safe harbor allowing an issuer to certify when its token is no longer part of an investment contract, addressing a core uncertainty under the Howey test.
…
The Federal Communications Commission has effectively barred new models of foreign-produced advanced robotic devices from the U.S. market, citing national security risks.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on July 28, 2026, added foreign-produced "advanced robotic devices" to its Covered List, a roster of equipment deemed to pose an unacceptable national security risk. Under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, listed equipment cannot receive FCC authorization, effectively barring new or modified models from being imported or sold in the U.S. The action, widely seen as targeting Chinese technology, follows similar prohibitions on drones, routers, and power inverters.
…
In a formal letter to the EU, the US government warned it will take "any actions necessary" to shield US businesses from the extraterritorial impact and reporting burdens of the CSDDD and CSRD.
The US government has formally challenged the European Union's ambitious sustainability regulations, arguing they create unreasonable burdens for American commerce. In a letter to the EU, the US Mission stated that the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) have an adverse extraterritorial impact on US businesses. The US objects to the directives' "double materiality" standard and extensive supply-chain diligence obligations, which it claims will harm the competitiveness of US firms, even those with minimal EU market links. The letter warns that the US will take "any actions necessary" to address these concerns. This executive branch action is mirrored by a legislative proposal, the Stop EU Overreach Act, which would require the US Trade Representative to investigate the EU rules as a potentially unfair trade practice. Counsel for multinational clients should monitor the EU's response and the potential for an escalating trade dispute while continuing to prepare for the directives' complex compliance regimes.
The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has issued a final rule permanently ending Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership reporting obligations for all U.S. companies and persons.
The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a final rule that permanently exempts all U.S. companies and persons from the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The rule, effective August 14, 2026, makes permanent the exemptions introduced in a March 2025 interim rule. This action represents a monumental reversal of a major compliance regime that was expected to affect over 32 million U.S. entities. Following a series of constitutional challenges and injunctions against the CTA, FinCEN has now narrowed the reporting obligation to only foreign companies registered to do business in the United States. The agency estimates only 28,000 entities will now be required to report. Furthermore, FinCEN announced it will delete all BOI previously reported by U.S. persons from its database. While this relieves domestic companies of a significant burden, foreign entities operating in the U.S. must still evaluate their reporting obligations for non-U.S. beneficial owners.
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking offers the first detailed look at how regulators will define who must obtain a federal license to issue or sell payment stablecoins in the United States.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued a long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Enacted in July 2025, the Act creates a comprehensive federal licensing and supervisory framework for payment stablecoins. This NPRM proposes definitions for crucial jurisdictional terms, including what it means to “issue a payment stablecoin in the United States” and to “offer or sell” one to a person in the U.S. These definitions are fundamental for the digital asset industry, as they will determine which issuers must obtain a federal license starting in January 2027 and which stablecoins digital asset service providers can lawfully offer to U.S. customers. The rules will significantly impact both domestic and foreign-based issuers and exchanges seeking access to the American market. The Treasury has opened a 60-day public comment period, and market participants are expected to weigh in heavily on the proposal, which will shape the future of the U.S. stablecoin landscape.
A unanimous Supreme Court held the SEC may recover a defendant's wrongful gains regardless of investor financial loss, but a concurrence questions whether disgorgement now triggers a right to a jury trial.
In Sripetch v. SEC, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the Securities and Exchange Commission may obtain disgorgement of a defendant's ill-gotten gains without proving that investors suffered a corresponding financial loss. Writing for the Court, Justice Gorsuch grounded the decision in traditional equitable principles, explaining that disgorgement is measured by the wrongdoer's gain, not the victim's loss. The ruling resolves a circuit split in the SEC's favor, preserving a powerful enforcement tool used to recover billions annually and foreclosing a key defense in cases like market manipulation or pump-and-dump schemes where proving investor harm is difficult.
…
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig directed staff to develop a crypto-asset market structure under existing authority, creating a parallel regulatory track should the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act fail to pass the Senate.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig has formally directed agency staff to begin drafting rules for a crypto-asset market structure under the CFTC’s existing statutory authority. The announcement, made during an Innovation Advisory Committee meeting, signals a significant strategic shift, establishing an administrative path for regulation that can proceed independently if the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act does not pass in the Senate.
…
The Court of Chancery held for the first time that a board's "grossly negligent" process in managing a conflicted director can defeat the DGCL Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor, even with a disinterested majority vote.
In its first interpretation of amended Delaware General Corporation Law Section 144, the Court of Chancery in 'Dodiya v. Franklin' denied a motion to dismiss, holding that safe-harbor protection for a conflicted transaction was unavailable at the pleading stage. The court found it "reasonably conceivable" that the target's board acted with gross negligence by restoring a conflicted director's access to confidential sale-process information, despite knowing he had previously leaked material nonpublic data to his father, the ultimate acquirer. This decision establishes that the Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor requires not just a disinterested majority vote, but a process conducted "in good faith and without gross negligence." For corporate counsel and dealmakers, this ruling underscores that process controls are critical; merely walling off a conflicted director on paper is insufficient if not enforced. The court also found the stockholder-vote safe harbor under Section 144(a)(2) was unavailable because the proxy statement allegedly misrepresented the conflicted director's exclusion from
…
FinCEN's August 2026 final rule permanently removes domestic entities and U.S. persons from CTA reporting while significantly narrowing foreign company obligations.
FinCEN's August 14, 2026 final rule marks a fundamental restructuring of the Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership reporting regime. Domestic entities created under U.S. state or tribal law are permanently removed from the definition of "reporting company," eliminating both initial filing requirements and ongoing update obligations. U.S. persons are similarly exempt from beneficial owner or company applicant status, meaning foreign reporting companies need not collect their personal identifying information. Notably, FinCEN will conduct a targeted purge of previously submitted domestic company and U.S. person data from its Beneficial Ownership IT System.
…
A new final rule effective Sept. 21, 2026, removes the long-standing requirement for federal contractors to use Form CC-305 and conduct a 7% utilization analysis, though core nondiscrimination obligations remain.
The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued a final rule that removes long-standing disability affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. Effective September 21, 2026, the rule eliminates the 7% disability utilization goal, the associated annual utilization analysis, and the mandatory use of Form CC-305 for inviting applicants and employees to self-identify as having a disability.
This change overhauls a compliance framework that has been in place for more than a decade, easing certain specific data-collection and analytical burdens. However, the rule does not alter contractors' core nondiscrimination duties under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act. Contractors must still take affirmative action to employ and advance qualified individuals with disabilities and maintain written affirmative action programs where required.
…
The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's finding that the False Claims Act's qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause, but remanded other Article II challenges for further review.
The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's unprecedented 2024 decision that had found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the appellate court held that private relators are not "Officers of the United States" requiring presidential appointment, aligning its view with every other circuit to have considered the question and resolving a threat to the government's primary anti-fraud tool.
…
A new presidential bill would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing authorization regime for foreign acquisitions of over 49% in designated sensitive sectors.
Mexico's executive branch has introduced a bill to establish a formal national security screening process for foreign direct investment (FDI), modeled on the CFIUS regime in the United States. If enacted, the law would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing filing for foreign acquisitions of more than 49% equity in Mexican companies operating in broadly defined "sensitive sectors" including critical technology, energy, and strategic infrastructure.
…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a landmark district court ruling, holding that False Claims Act whistleblowers are not "officers" under the Appointments Clause and allowing their suits to proceed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, has reversed a district court decision that struck down the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provisions as unconstitutional. The lower court had reasoned that private relators (whistleblowers) act as "officers of the United States" and therefore must be appointed in accordance with Article II’s Appointments Clause. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed, holding that a relator does not occupy a "continuing position established by law" because their role is temporary, personal to a specific case, and not compensated by a government salary.
…
A proposed notice-and-access framework for ERISA group health plan disclosures would expand electronic delivery options but create a third set of rules alongside those for retirement and other welfare plans.
The US Department of Labor has proposed a new optional safe harbor to allow electronic delivery of ERISA-required group health plan disclosures. The rule, proposed July 23, 2026, would establish a “notice-and-access” framework similar to that available for retirement plans, permitting administrators to post documents online and send a notice of internet availability. This could significantly reduce administrative burdens and costs for employers, especially for reaching employees without regular work-related computer access, retirees, and other beneficiaries who provide an electronic address.
…
Two recent Court of Appeal decisions chart the boundaries for granting anti-suit injunctions against foreign proceedings, offering key lessons on drafting and dispute strategy for Russia-related matters.
In two recent decisions, the UK Court of Appeal clarified the dividing line for granting anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) to block Russian legal proceedings arising from sanctions. The court refused an ASI in FH Holding v UniCredit, where a foreclosure action was brought in Moscow under a specific Russian-law mortgage agreement, finding this did not breach a Vienna arbitration clause in a related facility agreement. Conversely, in JP Morgan v VTB, it granted an ASI to stop Russian tort claims, deeming them a vexatious attempt to circumvent London arbitration agreements and UK sanctions using purpose-built Russian laws.
…
The Ninth Circuit held that sports-related event contracts are not federally regulated swaps, clearing the way for state gaming laws and directly conflicting with a recent Third Circuit decision.
The Ninth Circuit ruled in KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad that sports event prediction contracts are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), exposing them to state-level gaming regulation. The decision allows Nevada to apply its gaming laws to operator Kalshi and rejects the argument that the products fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which had supported Kalshi as an amicus.
This ruling matters because it creates a direct conflict with an April 2026 Third Circuit decision that found such contracts were indeed federally regulated swaps preempting state law. The split introduces significant legal uncertainty for the fast-growing prediction-market industry, which now faces a fractured regulatory landscape. For clients in this sector, the key question is whether they will be governed by a single federal regulator or a complex patchwork of state gaming laws.
…
The Australian government published voluntary guidance for corporate climate transition planning, establishing a national good-practice standard aligned with international frameworks.
The Australian government has published its anticipated voluntary guidance on climate-related transition planning. Released on August 24, 2026, the framework is designed to help organizations develop strategies for the net-zero transition and adapt to the physical impacts of climate change. The guidance sets out a four-stage planning cycle and a three-tier proportionality framework, allowing companies to tailor their approach based on their climate risk exposure and complexity.
…
Effective April 2026, a new UK framework for consumer composite investments requires manufacturers and distributors, including non-UK firms, to replace familiar KIIDs with a new CCI Product Summary by June 2027.
The UK has implemented a significant new disclosure framework for consumer composite investments (CCIs), replacing the familiar PRIIPs and UCITS key information documents (KIDs). Effective April 6, 2026, with a transition period until June 7, 2027, the rules require firms marketing products like funds, structured products, and derivatives to UK retail investors to adopt a new 'CCI Product Summary.' Sophisticated counsel must note the regime's broad extraterritorial reach, which applies to non-UK manufacturers and distributors, bringing many previously unregulated entities under the Financial Conduct Authority's direct supervision for these activities. The new framework also mandates that manufacturers provide machine-readable 'Core Information Disclosure' to distributors. While the format for the new Product Summary is less prescriptive than the old KIDs, it includes specific methodologies for calculating and presenting risk, return, and cost information. Firms must now identify all in-scope products, develop new disclosure templates, and ensure their data processes can meet the upda
…
Washington's new Electric Transmission Authority will coordinate siting, financing, and eminent domain for high-priority corridors to move eastern renewables west of the Cascades.
Governor Inslee signed SB 6355 in March, creating the Washington Electric Transmission Authority (WETA), which took effect in June. WETA is an independent body with a 10-member gubernatorial board to be seated by January 1, 2027, and an executive director to be hired by June 30, 2027. Its remit is to coordinate transmission planning across utilities, BPA, tribes, and developers in corridors identified by the Department of Commerce, with powers to support permitting, partner with developers, own facilities on a transitional basis, and—critically—exercise eminent domain under RCW 8.04 to clear right-of-way disputes that have stalled projects. The authority is not a financing entity; it routes capital needs to the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority. Counsel should watch three near-term developments: the December 1, 2026 tribal consultation framework report, the January 2027 legislative session that may address SEPA exclusions for reconductoring and essential public facility designation, and the Department of Commerce's high-priority corridor designation process, all of wh
…
The final plan formalizes a 97% targeted-relief target, 90% litigation-win floor, and resource concentration on ten-plus-employee systemic cases through 2030.
The EEOC has formally adopted its Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2026–2030, the institutional counterpart to its National Enforcement Plan and the metric framework that will govern agency operations for the next five years. Three strategic goals drive the plan: strategic law enforcement, outreach and training, and organizational excellence, supported by seventeen performance measures with hard numerical targets. Key measures employers should track include a 97% rate for non-monetary targeted equitable relief in conciliation and litigation outcomes, a 90% favorable resolution rate in enforcement suits, and a refocused Systemic Program keyed to matters involving ten or more aggrieved individuals, with explicit retention of Commissioner Charges and directed investigations as tools. The plan also commits the agency to enhanced conciliation monitoring, faster intake processing (10% reduction by FY 2030), a 95% staffing target, and quarterly stakeholder satisfaction tracking, signaling a more disciplined and accountable EEOC. Coupled with the approximately 28% rise in annual private-secto
…
A new memorandum of understanding gives the SEC a formal channel to obtain confidential FDA records, increasing scrutiny of public disclosures by life sciences companies.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration have established a formal framework for sharing non-public information. An August 31, 2026, memorandum of understanding (MOU) gives the SEC’s divisions of Enforcement and Corporation Finance a direct channel to request and receive confidential records from the FDA concerning regulated public companies. For life sciences and other FDA-regulated issuers, this significantly raises the stakes for public communications. The SEC can now more easily cross-reference a company's investor-facing statements—regarding clinical trial results, product approval timelines, or the substance of agency meetings—against the FDA's own internal records. The MOU is part of a broader FDA transparency initiative, which includes the recent practice of publishing Complete Response Letters. The agreement heightens the risk of SEC scrutiny and potential enforcement action for disclosures that are perceived as incomplete, inconsistent, or more favorable than the underlying regulatory communications warrant. Companies must ensure all
…
The Federal Circuit held that inventor-advocacy groups lack Article III standing to sue the USPTO over allegedly misleading patent-grant language, finding that diverting resources to educate members is not a legally cognizable injury.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a suit by inventor advocacy groups challenging the "right to exclude" language on US patent grants. In US Inventor, Inc. v. Squires, the plaintiffs argued this language became misleading after the Supreme Court's eBay v. MercExchange decision made injunctive relief for infringement discretionary. The court found the groups lacked both organizational and associational standing.
…
New interim guidance extends the safe harbor for claiming carbon-capture tax credits, expands it to enhanced oil and gas recovery projects, and clarifies its use for recapture calculations.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2026-50, significantly expanding and extending an interim safe harbor for taxpayers claiming the Section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture and sequestration. The guidance responds to continued uncertainty caused by the EPA's proposal to remove certain reporting obligations (under Subpart RR) and its failure to launch its electronic reporting tool for the 2025 reporting year.
Sophisticated counsel should note three key changes. The relief is now extended to carbon oxide used as a tertiary injectant in qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery projects. The notice also confirms that taxpayers can rely on the safe harbor to determine amounts subject to recapture. Finally, the safe harbor's availability is extended beyond calendar year 2025, now applying to any year the EPA's reporting tool is not launched by March 31 of the following year, until further guidance is issued. This provides crucial planning certainty for clients developing and financing long-term carbon-capture projects.
…
FMC Chair DiBella signaled the Commission could use its Section 19 authority to probe the IMO's proposed maritime GHG levy, opening a new trade-policy front.
The IMO's proposed Net-Zero Framework would set mandatory GHG limits and emissions pricing across international shipping, with Tier 1 penalties of $100 and Tier 2 penalties of $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent for non-compliant fleets. FMC Chairman DiBella has publicly questioned whether the resulting costs on U.S. cargo would be inflationary and whether the regime would displace existing systems like the EU ETS. She has gone further, suggesting the framework could itself become the subject of an FMC investigation. Under 46 U.S.C. §§ 42101-42109 and 46 C.F.R. Part 550, the FMC can probe foreign laws, regulations, or carrier practices that create conditions unfavorable to U.S. foreign commerce, with remedies ranging from fee equalization and sailing limits to per-voyage penalties up to $1 million and, in extreme cases, requests to deny port entry. Sophisticated shippers, carriers, and counsel should reassess tariff surcharges, service-contract allocation clauses, and exposure to retaliation against flag states, while tracking the IMO's London session, the November intersessional, and t
…
A new report proposes extending corporate criminal liability to online platforms that fail to prevent fraud committed by their users, a significant expansion of the 'failure to prevent' model.
A report by Jonathan Fisher KC, 'Fraud in the Digital Age,' proposes creating a new corporate criminal offense in the UK for providers of regulated user-to-user services who fail to prevent fraud committed by users on their platforms. The proposal aims to close a perceived gap in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), whose 'failure to prevent fraud' offense applies only to fraud by a company's associates, not by independent third-party users.
If adopted, this would represent a material expansion of corporate criminal liability, making businesses responsible for offenses by people over whom they have no conventional control. The proposal would sit alongside the UK's new Online Safety Act 2023, which already imposes extensive regulatory duties on platforms to address illegal content, including fraud, backed by fines of up to 10% of global revenue. The government has not yet endorsed the proposal but is considering it.
…
A recent Court of Chancery decision applying the Fortis precedent shows the high cost of extracontractual misrepresentations by a buyer during M&A negotiations, absent a bilateral anti-reliance clause.
The Delaware Court of Chancery awarded a $120 million post-trial verdict against a private equity acquiror for fraud in an earnout dispute, finding the buyer knowingly misrepresented the existing payment volume on its platform—a key metric for the seller's earnout potential. The court found dispositive evidence in the acquiror's own internal emails, where the deal team acknowledged the figures shared with the seller were a "red herring."
…
In a case of first impression, the court adopted a new "transmit requirement" for direct copyright infringement claims, deepening a circuit split over the legality of embedding online content.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected the Ninth Circuit's long-standing "server test" for determining direct copyright infringement from embedded online content. In Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., the court established a new "transmit requirement," which asks which party's server transmitted the content to the end user and whether that transmission was authorized. This holding deepens a circuit split on a critical issue for any company operating a website that displays third-party material, from news aggregators to social media platforms. While the Fifth Circuit suggested its test may often produce similar results to the server test, the different legal reasoning creates significant uncertainty and risk for platforms operating nationwide. The court also found that URLs can, in some cases, qualify as "copyright management information" under the DMCA, creating another potential cause of action. The growing disagreement among federal circuits makes it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately intervene to establish a national stand
…
The state's first-ever Data Privacy Report calls for a comprehensive new statute and signals that the attorney general's office may use existing tools to pursue privacy-related harms.
Washington's Attorney General has released the state's first-ever Data Privacy Report, renewing the push for comprehensive privacy legislation after several years of stalled efforts. Although Washington has yet to pass a broad privacy law like those in California or Virginia, its previous proposals have served as influential blueprints for other states, making this development nationally significant. The report identifies four key concerns: overcollection and secondary use of data, weak consent mechanisms and deceptive design, the sale of sensitive data like biometrics and geolocation, and a lack of transparency in the data-broker industry. For businesses, the report signals that the AG’s office is actively monitoring for privacy-related harms and may use existing tools for enforcement, citing FTC actions against data brokers as examples. Counsel should monitor for new legislative proposals and anticipate increased enforcement scrutiny, particularly regarding the handling of sensitive consumer data and the operations of data brokers.
A Federal Circuit decision holds that non-practicing entities must make reasonable efforts to ensure their licensees comply with patent marking rules or risk forfeiting pre-suit damages in future enforcement actions.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of infringement claims in 'VDPP, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.,' ruling that the non-practicing entity (NPE) plaintiff could not claim pre-suit damages because it failed to police its licensees' compliance with patent marking statutes.
This decision is important because it extends the marking obligations under 35 U.S.C. § 287 to an NPE’s licensees, limiting the traditional view that NPEs without products are exempt from marking rules. The court found that VDPP's prior settlement agreements, which licensed the patent to other companies, created a duty for VDPP to make reasonable efforts to ensure those licensees marked their products. The failure to do so—and in one case, expressly waiving the marking requirement—was fatal to its claim for damages preceding actual notice of infringement.
…
The legal and commercial strategy for AI in the music industry is shifting from infringement lawsuits to the development of complex licensing frameworks that govern model training and output.
The music industry's approach to artificial intelligence is evolving from litigation over unauthorized data scraping and deepfakes toward building a market for licensed uses. This shift reflects a maturing ecosystem where stakeholders are exploring workable deal structures rather than relying solely on legal challenges. Sophisticated counsel for both AI developers and rights holders must now navigate emerging multi-layered permission frameworks. These frameworks distinguish between rights for training AI models on existing catalogs and rights governing the output, such as fan remixes, professional productions, or sound-alikes prompted by users.
…
DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division names global trade and customs evasion a top priority alongside an AI-enabled CBP enforcement platform targeting China-linked transshipment.
On August 13, 2026, the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released 'The Great Transshipment Scam,' estimating $10 billion to $100+ billion in annual tariff revenue losses from goods routed through Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Mexico, and Cambodia to evade Section 301 tariffs. The same day, DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a memorandum identifying global trade and commerce as a primary enforcement focus, covering illicit transshipment, country-of-origin fraud, undervaluation, sanctions evasion, and foreign forced labor schemes. CBP is building an AI 'detective border' that fuses anomaly detection, link analysis, capacity validation, and physical-to-digital verification to flag suspicious routing, bills of lading, origin claims, and container imaging. NFED plans to reach roughly 500 attorneys and staff by late August and continue expanding for two years, deploying sophisticated data analytics. The memo signals that civil customs exposure can escalate to criminal prosecution, with potential coordination across CBP, DOJ, and Commerce. Sophisticated coun
…
Five key U.S. financial regulators have issued a joint statement clarifying the rules on suspicious activity report confidentiality, addressing how institutions may communicate with customers who may be the subject of a SAR.
Five major U.S. financial regulators—the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, OCC, and FinCEN—have issued a joint statement to clarify how financial institutions can communicate with customers regarding suspicious activity without violating the strict confidentiality requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. Federal law prohibits disclosing to any person involved in a transaction that a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) has been filed, a practice known as “tipping off.” This prohibition creates practical challenges for institutions when they need to terminate customer relationships or obtain information related to potentially illicit activity.
…
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority has proposed amending its penalty framework to explicitly consider an individual's total income or net assets to ensure credible deterrence.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a consultation paper, CP26/19, proposing a significant change to how it calculates financial penalties for individuals in non-market abuse cases. The proposal would amend the regulator's policy to explicitly allow for penalty uplifts based on the size of an individual’s income or net assets, aiming to ensure "credible deterrence," particularly for wealthier individuals.
This shift could substantially increase financial exposure for senior managers and other high-net-worth individuals within regulated firms. Critics, such as law firm BCLP in its public response, argue the change could untether penalties from the specific nature and severity of the misconduct. This might lead to arbitrary and inconsistent outcomes, where fines are determined by an individual's overall wealth, including assets like inheritance that are unrelated to their regulated activities. Such an approach, critics contend, risks being perceived as more punitive than deterrent, especially when applied to negligence cases rather than deliberate misconduct. Counsel
…
The Financial Conduct Authority has eliminated the mandatory seven-day waiting period between prospectus and research publication and dropped equal information sharing rules for unconnected analysts to reduce costs and execution risk.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has implemented significant deregulatory changes to the equity IPO process, effective August 5, 2026, via its Policy Statement PS26/16. The reforms remove two key requirements introduced in 2018: the mandatory seven-day gap between the publication of a prospectus and connected research, and the obligation to share the same information with unconnected analysts. The FCA concluded the prior regime failed to achieve its goals, as few unconnected analyst reports were published, while the rules added market risk and compliance costs, placing UK listings at a competitive disadvantage. The changes are expected to shorten the IPO timeline, reduce execution risk, and lower costs for issuers. Issuers and their advisers should immediately update internal IPO process documentation and precedent timetables. The FCA will consider further reforms, including a potential relaxation of guidance on pre-mandate issuer/analyst interactions.
Australia's top financial regulators have jointly warned the industry to move beyond awareness to implement and test practical, measurable resilience measures against emerging threats from frontier AI.
Following a series of nine industry roundtables, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly put the financial sector on notice regarding risks from frontier artificial intelligence. The regulators stated that industry awareness must now translate into practical action, testing, and measurable resilience outcomes. They expect regulated entities to demonstrate that their governance processes, key decision-making arrangements, and communication strategies are robust enough to operate at the speed required by emerging AI-driven threats.
…
A recent Chancery Court decision warns that contractual veto rights do not shield a strategic investor or its board designee from liability for allegedly using those rights to destroy a company for competitive advantage.
In a recent opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery allowed a startup's lawsuit to proceed against a strategic investor and its board designee for an alleged “catch and kill” scheme. The startup, Zync Inc., claimed the investor used its contractually-granted board seat and veto rights to block essential financing and a $50 million acquisition, ultimately forcing Zync to shut down. The court denied the investor's motion to dismiss claims of fiduciary breach, aiding and abetting, and tortious interference.
…
The Ninth Circuit has ruled that federal commodity law does not preempt state gaming regulations for sports-related prediction markets, creating a direct conflict with the Third Circuit.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on August 28, 2026, that sports-event contracts on prediction markets are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), holding that federal law does not preempt state gambling regulations. The decision creates a direct circuit split with the Third Circuit, which had previously ruled in favor of federal preemption. The conflict injects significant legal and regulatory uncertainty into the rapidly growing prediction market industry, which saw trading volumes of $51 billion in 2025.
Sophisticated counsel and clients in the finance and gaming sectors care because operators like Kalshi and Polymarket now face a fractured regulatory landscape, potentially needing to comply with disparate state gaming laws in the Ninth Circuit while operating under a different, federally regulated regime elsewhere. This complicates business operations and increases compliance costs. The confirmed split makes the issue a strong candidate for Supreme Court review.
…
New IRS proposed regulations detail the requirements for employers to establish tax-advantaged contribution programs for 'Trump Accounts,' including plan documents, contribution limits, and nondiscrimination rules.
The U.S. Treasury and IRS have released proposed regulations clarifying how employers can contribute to new 'Trump Accounts,' a tax-advantaged savings vehicle for employees' dependents under Internal Revenue Code Section 128. The guidance provides the first concrete framework for employers considering offering this new benefit, addressing key operational questions such as the requirement for a formal written plan, a $2,500 annual per-employee contribution limit (indexed for inflation), and specific nondiscrimination tests modeled on those for dependent care flexible spending accounts. Notably, the rules clarify that employers cannot restrict contributions to a particular trustee and explicitly prohibit investing account funds in ESG-themed index funds. While the proposal answers many threshold questions, it leaves several administrative challenges unresolved, including procedures for contribution corrections and satisfying annual reporting obligations. Employers and their benefits counsel can now begin to evaluate the feasibility of such programs but will need to monitor for final re
…
President Trump signed EO 14421 directing the Secretary of Energy to ban imports of foreign-produced bulk-power equipment from China and other arms-embargoed countries, with implementing rules due by December 24, 2026.
President Trump issued Executive Order 14421 on August 26, 2026, invoking national security authority to restrict U.S. imports of bulk-power system electrical equipment from Covered Foreign Entities—countries subject to U.S. arms embargoes or sanctions under ITAR, currently including China and Russia. The order broadly covers equipment used in substations, control rooms, power generating systems, and associated software and firmware with remote-access capabilities, including transformers, inverters, battery energy storage systems, and industrial control systems.
No immediate private-party obligations arise; the Secretary of Energy must issue implementing regulations by December 24, 2026. Those regulations may prohibit acquisition, importation, transfer, or installation of covered equipment posing undue risk of sabotage, supply disruption, or catastrophic effects on critical infrastructure. Crucially, the Secretary may also impose conditions on already-installed equipment—requiring identification, isolation, monitoring, disconnection, replacement, or removal.
…
The Treasury and State Departments announced a significant escalation of the Iran sanctions program, targeting new economic sectors and threatening secondary sanctions against non-U.S. companies that facilitate Iranian trade.
On August 24, 2026, the U.S. government initiated "Operation Economic Outcast," a major escalation of its Iran sanctions program aimed at third-country enablers. The initiative imposes new sectoral sanctions on Iran's digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping industries. Concurrently, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) suspended five general licenses that had previously authorized certain educational, remittance, and cultural exchange activities. The action also includes nearly 90 new designations of entities, individuals, and vessels across several countries. For sophisticated counsel, this signals a "zero-leakage" enforcement posture with heightened secondary sanctions risk for non-U.S. companies, which are now on notice to sever ties with Iran. The accompanying FinCEN Section 311 action against a UAE bank demonstrates a broader use of regulatory tools to isolate Iran from the global financial system. Companies with any direct or indirect exposure to Iran should immediately review and update their compliance programs and screening protocols, as U.
…
Businesses facing a wave of class actions under the California Invasion of Privacy Act may soon see relief, as a new bill targeting website "pen register" claims has been sent to the governor.
California's legislature has passed SB 690, a bill that would curb a recent surge of litigation targeting common website tracking technologies. The bill, now awaiting the governor's signature, specifically eliminates the private right of action for claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act’s (CIPA) “pen register” and “trap and trace” provisions.
This is a critical development for businesses, as plaintiffs have been leveraging these wiretapping-era statutes to bring class actions over the use of routine tools like analytics pixels and cookies, seeking statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation without proving actual harm. If signed, the law would apply retroactively to many pending cases, offering immediate relief to defendants.
…
The SEC has proposed to eliminate Rule 206(4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act, but counsel should note that other federal, state, and contractual restrictions on political contributions would remain in place.
The SEC has proposed the full rescission of Rule 206(4)-5 of the Investment Advisers Act, its "pay-to-play" rule. Adopted in 2010, the rule prohibits an investment adviser from receiving compensation for services to a government-entity client for two years if the adviser or its associates make a political contribution to an official in a position to influence the award of advisory business. The proposal acknowledges industry criticism that the rule's rigid, strict-liability framework has led to severe consequences for minor violations.
…
The California Air Resources Board has released new guidance and a voluntary reporting platform for inaugural greenhouse gas emissions reports due this fall under the state's landmark corporate climate disclosure law.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new guidance and launched a voluntary online platform for companies preparing their first greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reports under the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253). Although the final implementing regulation awaits approval, CARB is proceeding as if the inaugural reports for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are due November 10, 2026. Sophisticated counsel should note the significant enforcement discretion outlined in the guidance for this first reporting cycle. Companies that were not already collecting GHG data as of December 5, 2024, are not required to generate new data for this deadline; instead, they may submit a “statement of non-reporting.” The guidance also clarifies that third-party assurance, while ultimately required by the statute, will not be a prerequisite for accepted submissions in 2026. Covered entities should immediately evaluate the guidance to determine their specific obligations and prepare for the upcoming filing.
The Department of Justice’s new National Fraud Enforcement Division will prioritize data-driven prosecutions targeting telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, and other healthcare schemes.
The Department of Justice’s recently formed National Fraud Enforcement Division has identified healthcare fraud as a primary enforcement priority. According to a memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald, the division will deploy advanced data analytics to proactively detect and prosecute fraudulent schemes in high-risk areas. These include telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, controlled substance diversion, and deceptive marketing of healthcare services.
…
The California Air Resources Board has released a new voluntary reporting platform, guidance document, and video tutorial to assist companies with their initial Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions disclosures due November 10, 2026, under SB 253.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new resources to help companies prepare for the first emissions reporting deadline under the state's climate disclosure law, SB 253. With inaugural reports on 2026 Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due by November 10, 2026, CARB has launched a voluntary online reporting platform, a formal guidance document, and a video tutorial explaining the submission process. While use of the platform is optional—companies may also submit reports via a dedicated email address—these tools provide needed clarity on the mechanics of compliance. The release demonstrates CARB's intent to adhere to the current timeline, even as the underlying regulations await final approval from the state's Office of Administrative Law. Covered entities should now be finalizing their GHG inventories and confirming internal processes for the November submission. The new guidance provides a clear pathway for the inaugural filing, representing a key milestone in the implementation of California's ambitious corporate climate transparency regime.
A Michigan ballot initiative expected in November would impose broad new political contribution restrictions on utilities, government contractors, and their many affiliates.
A Michigan ballot measure slated for the November election proposes one of the nation's most extensive "pay-to-play" laws, creating significant compliance risks for companies doing business in the state. The proposed law would bar political contributions from regulated electric and gas utilities as well as companies holding or seeking state or local government contracts over $250,000. Crucially, the restrictions extend far beyond the corporate entities themselves to cover their "principals"—a broadly defined group including directors, senior officers, 5% owners, lobbyists, and certain immediate family members. The rules would also apply to "affiliated entities," which could implicate corporate PACs and trade associations. The expansive scope means national corporations with Michigan operations will need to re-evaluate their political giving compliance programs and carefully track the personal contributions of a wide range of individuals. If passed, most provisions would take effect 10 days after the election is certified, requiring swift preparation.
Reversing a novel district court ruling, the panel held that private relators are not 'Officers of the United States' and their lawsuits do not violate the Appointments Clause.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed a district court decision that found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the panel held that private relators who sue on behalf of the government are not 'Officers of the United States' under Article II's Appointments Clause. The decision overturns a first-of-its-kind ruling from the Middle District of Florida and aligns the Eleventh Circuit with every other appellate court to have considered the issue. The ruling restores the status quo for FCA defendants and eliminates, for now, a potent defense in the Eleventh Circuit, a major venue for these cases. However, the constitutional fight is not over. The panel remanded the case for the district court to consider the defendant's other constitutional challenges based on the Take Care and Vesting Clauses. Counsel should also monitor a similar pending case in the Third Circuit. Despite the current unanimity among the circuits, recent comments from several Supreme Court justices sugg
…
The Department of Justice declined to prosecute a healthcare management company that self-disclosed fraud, while simultaneously indicting its former CEO for the scheme.
The Department of Justice has declined to prosecute Campus Eye Management Holdings under its new Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP), marking the first such declination for a healthcare company. The declination was granted after the company voluntarily disclosed misconduct, fully cooperated with investigators, and took remedial action, including agreeing to pay $1 million to affected patients. This resolution is a critical data point for corporate counsel and investors, as it demonstrates the tangible benefits of self-reporting under the new policy. However, it also powerfully illustrates the DOJ's focus on individual accountability. Concurrent with the corporate declination, the department unsealed a seven-count indictment against Campus Eye's founder and former CEO for allegedly orchestrating the $3.4 million Medicare billing fraud and kickback scheme. The case serves as a clear warning and a roadmap, signaling that while a company can earn leniency through cooperation, individuals responsible for the misconduct will be aggressively pursued. It highligh
…
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that part-time workers only need to show their status was an 'effective cause' of less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason', significantly lowering the bar for discrimination claims.
The UK Supreme Court has allowed an appeal in Augustine v Data Cars Ltd, significantly altering the causation test for discrimination under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. Overturning a prior Court of Appeal decision, the court held that a claimant need only demonstrate that their part-time status was an 'effective cause' of the less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason.' The justices reasoned that the UK's implementing regulations deliberately used the phrase 'on the ground that,' which aligns with established domestic discrimination law, rather than adopting the narrower 'solely' language from the corresponding EU Framework Agreement.
This decision materially lowers the bar for part-time workers bringing discrimination claims and increases litigation risk for employers. Company policies, such as flat-rate fees for benefits or access to systems, that were previously defensible may now be vulnerable if they disproportionately disadvantage part-time employees. Any UK employer with a part-time workforce is affected.
…
A 1-1 split among FTC commissioners on whether to impose a behavioral remedy in IonQ's acquisition of SkyWater allowed the deal to close, providing a detailed roadmap of their divergent analytical approaches to vertical transactions.
The Federal Trade Commission closed its investigation into quantum-computer developer IonQ's acquisition of semiconductor foundry SkyWater after its two sitting commissioners deadlocked on a remedy. The split allowed the transaction to close without conditions.
Chairman Andrew Ferguson concluded that the deal's vertical-integration risks—primarily that IonQ could foreclose rivals' access to SkyWater's foundry or gain access to their sensitive data—warranted a behavioral consent order. In contrast, Commissioner Mark Meador found insufficient evidence that the deal might substantially lessen competition, citing low foreclosure shares and the presence of alternative suppliers.
…
A proposed rule would remove a critical safe harbor for sponsored workers in E, H-1B, L-1, O-1, and TN status, potentially requiring them to leave the US immediately after a layoff.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has advanced a proposal to eliminate the 60-day grace period for certain nonimmigrant workers following the end of their employment. The rule, which has cleared review by the Office of Management and Budget, would affect individuals in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN status.
Since 2017, this discretionary grace period has provided a critical buffer for sponsored employees to seek new employment, change their immigration status, or arrange for departure without immediately falling out of status. Its removal would mark a return to the pre-2017 framework, where job loss could result in the immediate loss of one's legal basis to remain in the country. The change would create significant challenges for employers managing reductions in force and add pressure to accelerate hiring and sponsorship for skilled workers seeking new roles.
…
Companies are increasingly required to apply anti-corruption compliance principles to supply-chain diligence to avoid costly import bans targeting forced labor.
Corporate compliance programs are now being urged to treat forced-labor prevention with the same rigor as anti-corruption efforts. This shift is driven by aggressive enforcement of laws like the US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which establishes a rebuttable presumption that goods from certain regions are made with forced labor and are therefore banned from importation. The guide explains that this reverses the burden of proof, requiring importers to affirmatively demonstrate that their supply chains are clean through extensive due diligence and traceability measures. For sophisticated counsel and clients, this transforms supply-chain ethics from a reputational concern into a critical legal and business continuity risk. Failure to adapt can lead to shipment seizures, significant financial loss, and severe brand damage. Companies should now be integrating forced-labor risk assessments directly into their existing compliance frameworks and mapping supply chains beyond direct suppliers to prepare for potential enforcement actions.
A new bill would require government approval for foreign acquisitions over 49% in critical sectors, creating a CFIUS-like review process with significant potential for deal delays.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has submitted a bill to the Senate to establish a mandatory national security review for foreign acquisitions, similar to the CFIUS process in the United States. The proposed law would empower Mexico's National Foreign Investment Commission (CNIE) to screen deals where a foreign investor seeks to acquire more than 49% of a Mexican company that operates in a wide range of designated critical sectors and exceeds a yet-to-be-determined asset threshold.
This new regime could introduce significant uncertainty and delays into M&A transactions in Mexico. The list of covered industries is extensive, including energy, transportation, healthcare, and technology sectors like AI and semiconductors. A key point of concern is the review timeline: CNIE has 60 business days, extendable by 30, to issue a resolution. If no decision is issued within that period, the transaction is automatically deemed denied, heightening deal risk.
…
The two agencies have established a new framework for sharing non-public information, signaling a potential uptick in SEC enforcement actions concerning clinical trial data, product approvals, and safety matters.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on August 31, 2026, to formalize and enhance cooperation and information sharing. The agreement establishes a direct channel for the agencies to exchange non-public information, increasing the likelihood that the SEC will scrutinize company disclosures against data submitted to the FDA.
For sophisticated counsel and their clients in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and medical device sectors, this signals a heightened risk of enforcement actions. Discrepancies between statements to investors and filings with the FDA regarding clinical trials, regulatory approval status, or product safety could become a primary source for SEC investigations. The agencies have created dedicated points of contact to streamline the process. FDA-regulated public companies should immediately review their disclosure controls and procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy across all regulatory and financial reporting. Counsel should monitor for an expected increase in SEC filing r
…
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed a rule to make a temporary registration exemption for certain fund managers permanent, but with key changes to investor eligibility and redemption requirements.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed a rule to codify existing no-action relief and reinstate a pre-2012 registration exemption for certain commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs). This move would convert a temporary, staff-level accommodation into a durable, rule-based compliance pathway for managers of private funds offered to qualified eligible persons (QEPs).
Sophisticated counsel should note that the proposal differs materially from the current no-action relief. Most notably, the proposed rule would require a CPO to offer all participants a right of redemption before it could deregister, a requirement absent from the current relief. The proposal also modifies investor eligibility, narrowing the definition for individual investors while broadening it for institutional investors to include certain categories of accredited investors. This creates a strategic dilemma for fund managers, who must weigh the certainty of a final rule against the more straightforward deregistration process available now.
…
A new analysis finds online vendors often use misleading claims and omit key safety data when advertising non-FDA-approved compounded drugs, drawing increased FDA enforcement.
A study by DLA Piper highlights widespread misleading advertising and safety omissions by online pharmacies and telehealth platforms promoting non-FDA-approved compounded drugs. The analysis of 23 vendors found that 52% made unsupported efficacy claims and 43% had incomplete or misleading safety warnings, particularly for popular treatments in weight loss, erectile dysfunction, and hair loss.
This trend poses a significant risk for the pharmaceutical and telehealth industries, as consumers are often unable to distinguish between FDA-approved medicines and unvetted compounded formulations. The report notes that consumer trust is misplaced, with many believing online sellers are already approved by regulators. In response, the FDA has sharply increased enforcement, issuing over 100 warning letters since September 2025, primarily targeting providers of compounded GLP-1 drugs.
…
Sophisticated attacks use generative AI to clone executive voices and bypass multi-factor authentication, raising regulatory scrutiny in the UK and EU.
Attackers are deploying increasingly sophisticated social engineering campaigns against hedge funds and other asset managers, leveraging generative AI to create convincing synthetic voice and video replicas of senior executives. The new wave of "vishing" (voice phishing) and spearphishing attacks uses meticulously researched pretexts from public investor communications and can bypass common multi-factor authentication (MFA) through methods like adversary-in-the-middle proxies.
…
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed 'Regulation Crypto Assets,' a new framework creating tailored offering exemptions and a safe harbor for digital asset investment contracts.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a new framework intended to create a viable compliance path for cryptoasset offerings. The proposal, enjoying unified support from the commissioners, marks a significant shift from the prior administration's enforcement-led approach. It introduces two tailored offering exemptions: a "Startup Exemption" for raises up to $5 million and a tiered "Fundraising Exemption," modeled on Regulation A, for raises up to $75 million annually. It also establishes a safe harbor allowing an issuer to certify when its token is no longer part of an investment contract, addressing a core uncertainty under the Howey test.
…
A 1-1 split among FTC commissioners on whether to impose a behavioral remedy in IonQ's acquisition of SkyWater allowed the deal to close, providing a detailed roadmap of their divergent analytical approaches to vertical transactions.
The Federal Trade Commission closed its investigation into quantum-computer developer IonQ's acquisition of semiconductor foundry SkyWater after its two sitting commissioners deadlocked on a remedy. The split allowed the transaction to close without conditions.
Chairman Andrew Ferguson concluded that the deal's vertical-integration risks—primarily that IonQ could foreclose rivals' access to SkyWater's foundry or gain access to their sensitive data—warranted a behavioral consent order. In contrast, Commissioner Mark Meador found insufficient evidence that the deal might substantially lessen competition, citing low foreclosure shares and the presence of alternative suppliers.
…
The Court of Chancery held for the first time that a board's "grossly negligent" process in managing a conflicted director can defeat the DGCL Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor, even with a disinterested majority vote.
In its first interpretation of amended Delaware General Corporation Law Section 144, the Court of Chancery in 'Dodiya v. Franklin' denied a motion to dismiss, holding that safe-harbor protection for a conflicted transaction was unavailable at the pleading stage. The court found it "reasonably conceivable" that the target's board acted with gross negligence by restoring a conflicted director's access to confidential sale-process information, despite knowing he had previously leaked material nonpublic data to his father, the ultimate acquirer. This decision establishes that the Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor requires not just a disinterested majority vote, but a process conducted "in good faith and without gross negligence." For corporate counsel and dealmakers, this ruling underscores that process controls are critical; merely walling off a conflicted director on paper is insufficient if not enforced. The court also found the stockholder-vote safe harbor under Section 144(a)(2) was unavailable because the proxy statement allegedly misrepresented the conflicted director's exclusion from
…
A recent Court of Chancery decision applying the Fortis precedent shows the high cost of extracontractual misrepresentations by a buyer during M&A negotiations, absent a bilateral anti-reliance clause.
The Delaware Court of Chancery awarded a $120 million post-trial verdict against a private equity acquiror for fraud in an earnout dispute, finding the buyer knowingly misrepresented the existing payment volume on its platform—a key metric for the seller's earnout potential. The court found dispositive evidence in the acquiror's own internal emails, where the deal team acknowledged the figures shared with the seller were a "red herring."
…
A recent Chancery Court decision warns that contractual veto rights do not shield a strategic investor or its board designee from liability for allegedly using those rights to destroy a company for competitive advantage.
In a recent opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery allowed a startup's lawsuit to proceed against a strategic investor and its board designee for an alleged “catch and kill” scheme. The startup, Zync Inc., claimed the investor used its contractually-granted board seat and veto rights to block essential financing and a $50 million acquisition, ultimately forcing Zync to shut down. The court denied the investor's motion to dismiss claims of fiduciary breach, aiding and abetting, and tortious interference.
…
A new bill would require government approval for foreign acquisitions over 49% in critical sectors, creating a CFIUS-like review process with significant potential for deal delays.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has submitted a bill to the Senate to establish a mandatory national security review for foreign acquisitions, similar to the CFIUS process in the United States. The proposed law would empower Mexico's National Foreign Investment Commission (CNIE) to screen deals where a foreign investor seeks to acquire more than 49% of a Mexican company that operates in a wide range of designated critical sectors and exceeds a yet-to-be-determined asset threshold.
This new regime could introduce significant uncertainty and delays into M&A transactions in Mexico. The list of covered industries is extensive, including energy, transportation, healthcare, and technology sectors like AI and semiconductors. A key point of concern is the review timeline: CNIE has 60 business days, extendable by 30, to issue a resolution. If no decision is issued within that period, the transaction is automatically deemed denied, heightening deal risk.
…
Sophisticated attacks use generative AI to clone executive voices and bypass multi-factor authentication, raising regulatory scrutiny in the UK and EU.
Attackers are deploying increasingly sophisticated social engineering campaigns against hedge funds and other asset managers, leveraging generative AI to create convincing synthetic voice and video replicas of senior executives. The new wave of "vishing" (voice phishing) and spearphishing attacks uses meticulously researched pretexts from public investor communications and can bypass common multi-factor authentication (MFA) through methods like adversary-in-the-middle proxies.
…
A new final rule effective Sept. 21, 2026, removes the long-standing requirement for federal contractors to use Form CC-305 and conduct a 7% utilization analysis, though core nondiscrimination obligations remain.
The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued a final rule that removes long-standing disability affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. Effective September 21, 2026, the rule eliminates the 7% disability utilization goal, the associated annual utilization analysis, and the mandatory use of Form CC-305 for inviting applicants and employees to self-identify as having a disability.
This change overhauls a compliance framework that has been in place for more than a decade, easing certain specific data-collection and analytical burdens. However, the rule does not alter contractors' core nondiscrimination duties under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act. Contractors must still take affirmative action to employ and advance qualified individuals with disabilities and maintain written affirmative action programs where required.
…
A proposed notice-and-access framework for ERISA group health plan disclosures would expand electronic delivery options but create a third set of rules alongside those for retirement and other welfare plans.
The US Department of Labor has proposed a new optional safe harbor to allow electronic delivery of ERISA-required group health plan disclosures. The rule, proposed July 23, 2026, would establish a “notice-and-access” framework similar to that available for retirement plans, permitting administrators to post documents online and send a notice of internet availability. This could significantly reduce administrative burdens and costs for employers, especially for reaching employees without regular work-related computer access, retirees, and other beneficiaries who provide an electronic address.
…
The final plan formalizes a 97% targeted-relief target, 90% litigation-win floor, and resource concentration on ten-plus-employee systemic cases through 2030.
The EEOC has formally adopted its Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2026–2030, the institutional counterpart to its National Enforcement Plan and the metric framework that will govern agency operations for the next five years. Three strategic goals drive the plan: strategic law enforcement, outreach and training, and organizational excellence, supported by seventeen performance measures with hard numerical targets. Key measures employers should track include a 97% rate for non-monetary targeted equitable relief in conciliation and litigation outcomes, a 90% favorable resolution rate in enforcement suits, and a refocused Systemic Program keyed to matters involving ten or more aggrieved individuals, with explicit retention of Commissioner Charges and directed investigations as tools. The plan also commits the agency to enhanced conciliation monitoring, faster intake processing (10% reduction by FY 2030), a 95% staffing target, and quarterly stakeholder satisfaction tracking, signaling a more disciplined and accountable EEOC. Coupled with the approximately 28% rise in annual private-secto
…
New IRS proposed regulations detail the requirements for employers to establish tax-advantaged contribution programs for 'Trump Accounts,' including plan documents, contribution limits, and nondiscrimination rules.
The U.S. Treasury and IRS have released proposed regulations clarifying how employers can contribute to new 'Trump Accounts,' a tax-advantaged savings vehicle for employees' dependents under Internal Revenue Code Section 128. The guidance provides the first concrete framework for employers considering offering this new benefit, addressing key operational questions such as the requirement for a formal written plan, a $2,500 annual per-employee contribution limit (indexed for inflation), and specific nondiscrimination tests modeled on those for dependent care flexible spending accounts. Notably, the rules clarify that employers cannot restrict contributions to a particular trustee and explicitly prohibit investing account funds in ESG-themed index funds. While the proposal answers many threshold questions, it leaves several administrative challenges unresolved, including procedures for contribution corrections and satisfying annual reporting obligations. Employers and their benefits counsel can now begin to evaluate the feasibility of such programs but will need to monitor for final re
…
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that part-time workers only need to show their status was an 'effective cause' of less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason', significantly lowering the bar for discrimination claims.
The UK Supreme Court has allowed an appeal in Augustine v Data Cars Ltd, significantly altering the causation test for discrimination under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. Overturning a prior Court of Appeal decision, the court held that a claimant need only demonstrate that their part-time status was an 'effective cause' of the less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason.' The justices reasoned that the UK's implementing regulations deliberately used the phrase 'on the ground that,' which aligns with established domestic discrimination law, rather than adopting the narrower 'solely' language from the corresponding EU Framework Agreement.
This decision materially lowers the bar for part-time workers bringing discrimination claims and increases litigation risk for employers. Company policies, such as flat-rate fees for benefits or access to systems, that were previously defensible may now be vulnerable if they disproportionately disadvantage part-time employees. Any UK employer with a part-time workforce is affected.
…
Washington's new Electric Transmission Authority will coordinate siting, financing, and eminent domain for high-priority corridors to move eastern renewables west of the Cascades.
Governor Inslee signed SB 6355 in March, creating the Washington Electric Transmission Authority (WETA), which took effect in June. WETA is an independent body with a 10-member gubernatorial board to be seated by January 1, 2027, and an executive director to be hired by June 30, 2027. Its remit is to coordinate transmission planning across utilities, BPA, tribes, and developers in corridors identified by the Department of Commerce, with powers to support permitting, partner with developers, own facilities on a transitional basis, and—critically—exercise eminent domain under RCW 8.04 to clear right-of-way disputes that have stalled projects. The authority is not a financing entity; it routes capital needs to the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority. Counsel should watch three near-term developments: the December 1, 2026 tribal consultation framework report, the January 2027 legislative session that may address SEPA exclusions for reconductoring and essential public facility designation, and the Department of Commerce's high-priority corridor designation process, all of wh
…
President Trump signed EO 14421 directing the Secretary of Energy to ban imports of foreign-produced bulk-power equipment from China and other arms-embargoed countries, with implementing rules due by December 24, 2026.
President Trump issued Executive Order 14421 on August 26, 2026, invoking national security authority to restrict U.S. imports of bulk-power system electrical equipment from Covered Foreign Entities—countries subject to U.S. arms embargoes or sanctions under ITAR, currently including China and Russia. The order broadly covers equipment used in substations, control rooms, power generating systems, and associated software and firmware with remote-access capabilities, including transformers, inverters, battery energy storage systems, and industrial control systems.
No immediate private-party obligations arise; the Secretary of Energy must issue implementing regulations by December 24, 2026. Those regulations may prohibit acquisition, importation, transfer, or installation of covered equipment posing undue risk of sabotage, supply disruption, or catastrophic effects on critical infrastructure. Crucially, the Secretary may also impose conditions on already-installed equipment—requiring identification, isolation, monitoring, disconnection, replacement, or removal.
…
In a formal letter to the EU, the US government warned it will take "any actions necessary" to shield US businesses from the extraterritorial impact and reporting burdens of the CSDDD and CSRD.
The US government has formally challenged the European Union's ambitious sustainability regulations, arguing they create unreasonable burdens for American commerce. In a letter to the EU, the US Mission stated that the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) have an adverse extraterritorial impact on US businesses. The US objects to the directives' "double materiality" standard and extensive supply-chain diligence obligations, which it claims will harm the competitiveness of US firms, even those with minimal EU market links. The letter warns that the US will take "any actions necessary" to address these concerns. This executive branch action is mirrored by a legislative proposal, the Stop EU Overreach Act, which would require the US Trade Representative to investigate the EU rules as a potentially unfair trade practice. Counsel for multinational clients should monitor the EU's response and the potential for an escalating trade dispute while continuing to prepare for the directives' complex compliance regimes.
The Australian government published voluntary guidance for corporate climate transition planning, establishing a national good-practice standard aligned with international frameworks.
The Australian government has published its anticipated voluntary guidance on climate-related transition planning. Released on August 24, 2026, the framework is designed to help organizations develop strategies for the net-zero transition and adapt to the physical impacts of climate change. The guidance sets out a four-stage planning cycle and a three-tier proportionality framework, allowing companies to tailor their approach based on their climate risk exposure and complexity.
…
The California Air Resources Board has released new guidance and a voluntary reporting platform for inaugural greenhouse gas emissions reports due this fall under the state's landmark corporate climate disclosure law.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new guidance and launched a voluntary online platform for companies preparing their first greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reports under the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253). Although the final implementing regulation awaits approval, CARB is proceeding as if the inaugural reports for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are due November 10, 2026. Sophisticated counsel should note the significant enforcement discretion outlined in the guidance for this first reporting cycle. Companies that were not already collecting GHG data as of December 5, 2024, are not required to generate new data for this deadline; instead, they may submit a “statement of non-reporting.” The guidance also clarifies that third-party assurance, while ultimately required by the statute, will not be a prerequisite for accepted submissions in 2026. Covered entities should immediately evaluate the guidance to determine their specific obligations and prepare for the upcoming filing.
The California Air Resources Board has released a new voluntary reporting platform, guidance document, and video tutorial to assist companies with their initial Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions disclosures due November 10, 2026, under SB 253.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new resources to help companies prepare for the first emissions reporting deadline under the state's climate disclosure law, SB 253. With inaugural reports on 2026 Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due by November 10, 2026, CARB has launched a voluntary online reporting platform, a formal guidance document, and a video tutorial explaining the submission process. While use of the platform is optional—companies may also submit reports via a dedicated email address—these tools provide needed clarity on the mechanics of compliance. The release demonstrates CARB's intent to adhere to the current timeline, even as the underlying regulations await final approval from the state's Office of Administrative Law. Covered entities should now be finalizing their GHG inventories and confirming internal processes for the November submission. The new guidance provides a clear pathway for the inaugural filing, representing a key milestone in the implementation of California's ambitious corporate climate transparency regime.
A new memorandum of understanding gives the SEC a formal channel to obtain confidential FDA records, increasing scrutiny of public disclosures by life sciences companies.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration have established a formal framework for sharing non-public information. An August 31, 2026, memorandum of understanding (MOU) gives the SEC’s divisions of Enforcement and Corporation Finance a direct channel to request and receive confidential records from the FDA concerning regulated public companies. For life sciences and other FDA-regulated issuers, this significantly raises the stakes for public communications. The SEC can now more easily cross-reference a company's investor-facing statements—regarding clinical trial results, product approval timelines, or the substance of agency meetings—against the FDA's own internal records. The MOU is part of a broader FDA transparency initiative, which includes the recent practice of publishing Complete Response Letters. The agreement heightens the risk of SEC scrutiny and potential enforcement action for disclosures that are perceived as incomplete, inconsistent, or more favorable than the underlying regulatory communications warrant. Companies must ensure all
…
A new analysis finds online vendors often use misleading claims and omit key safety data when advertising non-FDA-approved compounded drugs, drawing increased FDA enforcement.
A study by DLA Piper highlights widespread misleading advertising and safety omissions by online pharmacies and telehealth platforms promoting non-FDA-approved compounded drugs. The analysis of 23 vendors found that 52% made unsupported efficacy claims and 43% had incomplete or misleading safety warnings, particularly for popular treatments in weight loss, erectile dysfunction, and hair loss.
This trend poses a significant risk for the pharmaceutical and telehealth industries, as consumers are often unable to distinguish between FDA-approved medicines and unvetted compounded formulations. The report notes that consumer trust is misplaced, with many believing online sellers are already approved by regulators. In response, the FDA has sharply increased enforcement, issuing over 100 warning letters since September 2025, primarily targeting providers of compounded GLP-1 drugs.
…
The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has issued a final rule permanently ending Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership reporting obligations for all U.S. companies and persons.
The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a final rule that permanently exempts all U.S. companies and persons from the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The rule, effective August 14, 2026, makes permanent the exemptions introduced in a March 2025 interim rule. This action represents a monumental reversal of a major compliance regime that was expected to affect over 32 million U.S. entities. Following a series of constitutional challenges and injunctions against the CTA, FinCEN has now narrowed the reporting obligation to only foreign companies registered to do business in the United States. The agency estimates only 28,000 entities will now be required to report. Furthermore, FinCEN announced it will delete all BOI previously reported by U.S. persons from its database. While this relieves domestic companies of a significant burden, foreign entities operating in the U.S. must still evaluate their reporting obligations for non-U.S. beneficial owners.
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig directed staff to develop a crypto-asset market structure under existing authority, creating a parallel regulatory track should the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act fail to pass the Senate.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig has formally directed agency staff to begin drafting rules for a crypto-asset market structure under the CFTC’s existing statutory authority. The announcement, made during an Innovation Advisory Committee meeting, signals a significant strategic shift, establishing an administrative path for regulation that can proceed independently if the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act does not pass in the Senate.
…
FinCEN's August 2026 final rule permanently removes domestic entities and U.S. persons from CTA reporting while significantly narrowing foreign company obligations.
FinCEN's August 14, 2026 final rule marks a fundamental restructuring of the Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership reporting regime. Domestic entities created under U.S. state or tribal law are permanently removed from the definition of "reporting company," eliminating both initial filing requirements and ongoing update obligations. U.S. persons are similarly exempt from beneficial owner or company applicant status, meaning foreign reporting companies need not collect their personal identifying information. Notably, FinCEN will conduct a targeted purge of previously submitted domestic company and U.S. person data from its Beneficial Ownership IT System.
…
The Ninth Circuit held that sports-related event contracts are not federally regulated swaps, clearing the way for state gaming laws and directly conflicting with a recent Third Circuit decision.
The Ninth Circuit ruled in KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad that sports event prediction contracts are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), exposing them to state-level gaming regulation. The decision allows Nevada to apply its gaming laws to operator Kalshi and rejects the argument that the products fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which had supported Kalshi as an amicus.
This ruling matters because it creates a direct conflict with an April 2026 Third Circuit decision that found such contracts were indeed federally regulated swaps preempting state law. The split introduces significant legal uncertainty for the fast-growing prediction-market industry, which now faces a fractured regulatory landscape. For clients in this sector, the key question is whether they will be governed by a single federal regulator or a complex patchwork of state gaming laws.
…
Effective April 2026, a new UK framework for consumer composite investments requires manufacturers and distributors, including non-UK firms, to replace familiar KIIDs with a new CCI Product Summary by June 2027.
The UK has implemented a significant new disclosure framework for consumer composite investments (CCIs), replacing the familiar PRIIPs and UCITS key information documents (KIDs). Effective April 6, 2026, with a transition period until June 7, 2027, the rules require firms marketing products like funds, structured products, and derivatives to UK retail investors to adopt a new 'CCI Product Summary.' Sophisticated counsel must note the regime's broad extraterritorial reach, which applies to non-UK manufacturers and distributors, bringing many previously unregulated entities under the Financial Conduct Authority's direct supervision for these activities. The new framework also mandates that manufacturers provide machine-readable 'Core Information Disclosure' to distributors. While the format for the new Product Summary is less prescriptive than the old KIDs, it includes specific methodologies for calculating and presenting risk, return, and cost information. Firms must now identify all in-scope products, develop new disclosure templates, and ensure their data processes can meet the upda
…
Five key U.S. financial regulators have issued a joint statement clarifying the rules on suspicious activity report confidentiality, addressing how institutions may communicate with customers who may be the subject of a SAR.
Five major U.S. financial regulators—the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, OCC, and FinCEN—have issued a joint statement to clarify how financial institutions can communicate with customers regarding suspicious activity without violating the strict confidentiality requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. Federal law prohibits disclosing to any person involved in a transaction that a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) has been filed, a practice known as “tipping off.” This prohibition creates practical challenges for institutions when they need to terminate customer relationships or obtain information related to potentially illicit activity.
…
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority has proposed amending its penalty framework to explicitly consider an individual's total income or net assets to ensure credible deterrence.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a consultation paper, CP26/19, proposing a significant change to how it calculates financial penalties for individuals in non-market abuse cases. The proposal would amend the regulator's policy to explicitly allow for penalty uplifts based on the size of an individual’s income or net assets, aiming to ensure "credible deterrence," particularly for wealthier individuals.
This shift could substantially increase financial exposure for senior managers and other high-net-worth individuals within regulated firms. Critics, such as law firm BCLP in its public response, argue the change could untether penalties from the specific nature and severity of the misconduct. This might lead to arbitrary and inconsistent outcomes, where fines are determined by an individual's overall wealth, including assets like inheritance that are unrelated to their regulated activities. Such an approach, critics contend, risks being perceived as more punitive than deterrent, especially when applied to negligence cases rather than deliberate misconduct. Counsel
…
Australia's top financial regulators have jointly warned the industry to move beyond awareness to implement and test practical, measurable resilience measures against emerging threats from frontier AI.
Following a series of nine industry roundtables, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly put the financial sector on notice regarding risks from frontier artificial intelligence. The regulators stated that industry awareness must now translate into practical action, testing, and measurable resilience outcomes. They expect regulated entities to demonstrate that their governance processes, key decision-making arrangements, and communication strategies are robust enough to operate at the speed required by emerging AI-driven threats.
…
The Ninth Circuit has ruled that federal commodity law does not preempt state gaming regulations for sports-related prediction markets, creating a direct conflict with the Third Circuit.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on August 28, 2026, that sports-event contracts on prediction markets are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), holding that federal law does not preempt state gambling regulations. The decision creates a direct circuit split with the Third Circuit, which had previously ruled in favor of federal preemption. The conflict injects significant legal and regulatory uncertainty into the rapidly growing prediction market industry, which saw trading volumes of $51 billion in 2025.
Sophisticated counsel and clients in the finance and gaming sectors care because operators like Kalshi and Polymarket now face a fractured regulatory landscape, potentially needing to comply with disparate state gaming laws in the Ninth Circuit while operating under a different, federally regulated regime elsewhere. This complicates business operations and increases compliance costs. The confirmed split makes the issue a strong candidate for Supreme Court review.
…
The SEC has proposed to eliminate Rule 206(4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act, but counsel should note that other federal, state, and contractual restrictions on political contributions would remain in place.
The SEC has proposed the full rescission of Rule 206(4)-5 of the Investment Advisers Act, its "pay-to-play" rule. Adopted in 2010, the rule prohibits an investment adviser from receiving compensation for services to a government-entity client for two years if the adviser or its associates make a political contribution to an official in a position to influence the award of advisory business. The proposal acknowledges industry criticism that the rule's rigid, strict-liability framework has led to severe consequences for minor violations.
…
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed a rule to make a temporary registration exemption for certain fund managers permanent, but with key changes to investor eligibility and redemption requirements.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed a rule to codify existing no-action relief and reinstate a pre-2012 registration exemption for certain commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs). This move would convert a temporary, staff-level accommodation into a durable, rule-based compliance pathway for managers of private funds offered to qualified eligible persons (QEPs).
Sophisticated counsel should note that the proposal differs materially from the current no-action relief. Most notably, the proposed rule would require a CPO to offer all participants a right of redemption before it could deregister, a requirement absent from the current relief. The proposal also modifies investor eligibility, narrowing the definition for individual investors while broadening it for institutional investors to include certain categories of accredited investors. This creates a strategic dilemma for fund managers, who must weigh the certainty of a final rule against the more straightforward deregistration process available now.
…
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking offers the first detailed look at how regulators will define who must obtain a federal license to issue or sell payment stablecoins in the United States.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued a long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Enacted in July 2025, the Act creates a comprehensive federal licensing and supervisory framework for payment stablecoins. This NPRM proposes definitions for crucial jurisdictional terms, including what it means to “issue a payment stablecoin in the United States” and to “offer or sell” one to a person in the U.S. These definitions are fundamental for the digital asset industry, as they will determine which issuers must obtain a federal license starting in January 2027 and which stablecoins digital asset service providers can lawfully offer to U.S. customers. The rules will significantly impact both domestic and foreign-based issuers and exchanges seeking access to the American market. The Treasury has opened a 60-day public comment period, and market participants are expected to weigh in heavily on the proposal, which will shape the future of the U.S. stablecoin landscape.
A proposed rule would remove a critical safe harbor for sponsored workers in E, H-1B, L-1, O-1, and TN status, potentially requiring them to leave the US immediately after a layoff.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has advanced a proposal to eliminate the 60-day grace period for certain nonimmigrant workers following the end of their employment. The rule, which has cleared review by the Office of Management and Budget, would affect individuals in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN status.
Since 2017, this discretionary grace period has provided a critical buffer for sponsored employees to seek new employment, change their immigration status, or arrange for departure without immediately falling out of status. Its removal would mark a return to the pre-2017 framework, where job loss could result in the immediate loss of one's legal basis to remain in the country. The change would create significant challenges for employers managing reductions in force and add pressure to accelerate hiring and sponsorship for skilled workers seeking new roles.
…
The Federal Communications Commission has effectively barred new models of foreign-produced advanced robotic devices from the U.S. market, citing national security risks.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on July 28, 2026, added foreign-produced "advanced robotic devices" to its Covered List, a roster of equipment deemed to pose an unacceptable national security risk. Under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, listed equipment cannot receive FCC authorization, effectively barring new or modified models from being imported or sold in the U.S. The action, widely seen as targeting Chinese technology, follows similar prohibitions on drones, routers, and power inverters.
…
A new presidential bill would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing authorization regime for foreign acquisitions of over 49% in designated sensitive sectors.
Mexico's executive branch has introduced a bill to establish a formal national security screening process for foreign direct investment (FDI), modeled on the CFIUS regime in the United States. If enacted, the law would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing filing for foreign acquisitions of more than 49% equity in Mexican companies operating in broadly defined "sensitive sectors" including critical technology, energy, and strategic infrastructure.
…
FMC Chair DiBella signaled the Commission could use its Section 19 authority to probe the IMO's proposed maritime GHG levy, opening a new trade-policy front.
The IMO's proposed Net-Zero Framework would set mandatory GHG limits and emissions pricing across international shipping, with Tier 1 penalties of $100 and Tier 2 penalties of $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent for non-compliant fleets. FMC Chairman DiBella has publicly questioned whether the resulting costs on U.S. cargo would be inflationary and whether the regime would displace existing systems like the EU ETS. She has gone further, suggesting the framework could itself become the subject of an FMC investigation. Under 46 U.S.C. §§ 42101-42109 and 46 C.F.R. Part 550, the FMC can probe foreign laws, regulations, or carrier practices that create conditions unfavorable to U.S. foreign commerce, with remedies ranging from fee equalization and sailing limits to per-voyage penalties up to $1 million and, in extreme cases, requests to deny port entry. Sophisticated shippers, carriers, and counsel should reassess tariff surcharges, service-contract allocation clauses, and exposure to retaliation against flag states, while tracking the IMO's London session, the November intersessional, and t
…
DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division names global trade and customs evasion a top priority alongside an AI-enabled CBP enforcement platform targeting China-linked transshipment.
On August 13, 2026, the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released 'The Great Transshipment Scam,' estimating $10 billion to $100+ billion in annual tariff revenue losses from goods routed through Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Mexico, and Cambodia to evade Section 301 tariffs. The same day, DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a memorandum identifying global trade and commerce as a primary enforcement focus, covering illicit transshipment, country-of-origin fraud, undervaluation, sanctions evasion, and foreign forced labor schemes. CBP is building an AI 'detective border' that fuses anomaly detection, link analysis, capacity validation, and physical-to-digital verification to flag suspicious routing, bills of lading, origin claims, and container imaging. NFED plans to reach roughly 500 attorneys and staff by late August and continue expanding for two years, deploying sophisticated data analytics. The memo signals that civil customs exposure can escalate to criminal prosecution, with potential coordination across CBP, DOJ, and Commerce. Sophisticated coun
…
Companies are increasingly required to apply anti-corruption compliance principles to supply-chain diligence to avoid costly import bans targeting forced labor.
Corporate compliance programs are now being urged to treat forced-labor prevention with the same rigor as anti-corruption efforts. This shift is driven by aggressive enforcement of laws like the US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which establishes a rebuttable presumption that goods from certain regions are made with forced labor and are therefore banned from importation. The guide explains that this reverses the burden of proof, requiring importers to affirmatively demonstrate that their supply chains are clean through extensive due diligence and traceability measures. For sophisticated counsel and clients, this transforms supply-chain ethics from a reputational concern into a critical legal and business continuity risk. Failure to adapt can lead to shipment seizures, significant financial loss, and severe brand damage. Companies should now be integrating forced-labor risk assessments directly into their existing compliance frameworks and mapping supply chains beyond direct suppliers to prepare for potential enforcement actions.
The Federal Circuit held that inventor-advocacy groups lack Article III standing to sue the USPTO over allegedly misleading patent-grant language, finding that diverting resources to educate members is not a legally cognizable injury.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a suit by inventor advocacy groups challenging the "right to exclude" language on US patent grants. In US Inventor, Inc. v. Squires, the plaintiffs argued this language became misleading after the Supreme Court's eBay v. MercExchange decision made injunctive relief for infringement discretionary. The court found the groups lacked both organizational and associational standing.
…
A Federal Circuit decision holds that non-practicing entities must make reasonable efforts to ensure their licensees comply with patent marking rules or risk forfeiting pre-suit damages in future enforcement actions.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of infringement claims in 'VDPP, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.,' ruling that the non-practicing entity (NPE) plaintiff could not claim pre-suit damages because it failed to police its licensees' compliance with patent marking statutes.
This decision is important because it extends the marking obligations under 35 U.S.C. § 287 to an NPE’s licensees, limiting the traditional view that NPEs without products are exempt from marking rules. The court found that VDPP's prior settlement agreements, which licensed the patent to other companies, created a duty for VDPP to make reasonable efforts to ensure those licensees marked their products. The failure to do so—and in one case, expressly waiving the marking requirement—was fatal to its claim for damages preceding actual notice of infringement.
…
Two recent Court of Appeal decisions chart the boundaries for granting anti-suit injunctions against foreign proceedings, offering key lessons on drafting and dispute strategy for Russia-related matters.
In two recent decisions, the UK Court of Appeal clarified the dividing line for granting anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) to block Russian legal proceedings arising from sanctions. The court refused an ASI in FH Holding v UniCredit, where a foreclosure action was brought in Moscow under a specific Russian-law mortgage agreement, finding this did not breach a Vienna arbitration clause in a related facility agreement. Conversely, in JP Morgan v VTB, it granted an ASI to stop Russian tort claims, deeming them a vexatious attempt to circumvent London arbitration agreements and UK sanctions using purpose-built Russian laws.
…
The state's first-ever Data Privacy Report calls for a comprehensive new statute and signals that the attorney general's office may use existing tools to pursue privacy-related harms.
Washington's Attorney General has released the state's first-ever Data Privacy Report, renewing the push for comprehensive privacy legislation after several years of stalled efforts. Although Washington has yet to pass a broad privacy law like those in California or Virginia, its previous proposals have served as influential blueprints for other states, making this development nationally significant. The report identifies four key concerns: overcollection and secondary use of data, weak consent mechanisms and deceptive design, the sale of sensitive data like biometrics and geolocation, and a lack of transparency in the data-broker industry. For businesses, the report signals that the AG’s office is actively monitoring for privacy-related harms and may use existing tools for enforcement, citing FTC actions against data brokers as examples. Counsel should monitor for new legislative proposals and anticipate increased enforcement scrutiny, particularly regarding the handling of sensitive consumer data and the operations of data brokers.
Businesses facing a wave of class actions under the California Invasion of Privacy Act may soon see relief, as a new bill targeting website "pen register" claims has been sent to the governor.
California's legislature has passed SB 690, a bill that would curb a recent surge of litigation targeting common website tracking technologies. The bill, now awaiting the governor's signature, specifically eliminates the private right of action for claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act’s (CIPA) “pen register” and “trap and trace” provisions.
This is a critical development for businesses, as plaintiffs have been leveraging these wiretapping-era statutes to bring class actions over the use of routine tools like analytics pixels and cookies, seeking statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation without proving actual harm. If signed, the law would apply retroactively to many pending cases, offering immediate relief to defendants.
…
A Michigan ballot initiative expected in November would impose broad new political contribution restrictions on utilities, government contractors, and their many affiliates.
A Michigan ballot measure slated for the November election proposes one of the nation's most extensive "pay-to-play" laws, creating significant compliance risks for companies doing business in the state. The proposed law would bar political contributions from regulated electric and gas utilities as well as companies holding or seeking state or local government contracts over $250,000. Crucially, the restrictions extend far beyond the corporate entities themselves to cover their "principals"—a broadly defined group including directors, senior officers, 5% owners, lobbyists, and certain immediate family members. The rules would also apply to "affiliated entities," which could implicate corporate PACs and trade associations. The expansive scope means national corporations with Michigan operations will need to re-evaluate their political giving compliance programs and carefully track the personal contributions of a wide range of individuals. If passed, most provisions would take effect 10 days after the election is certified, requiring swift preparation.
The Treasury and State Departments announced a significant escalation of the Iran sanctions program, targeting new economic sectors and threatening secondary sanctions against non-U.S. companies that facilitate Iranian trade.
On August 24, 2026, the U.S. government initiated "Operation Economic Outcast," a major escalation of its Iran sanctions program aimed at third-country enablers. The initiative imposes new sectoral sanctions on Iran's digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping industries. Concurrently, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) suspended five general licenses that had previously authorized certain educational, remittance, and cultural exchange activities. The action also includes nearly 90 new designations of entities, individuals, and vessels across several countries. For sophisticated counsel, this signals a "zero-leakage" enforcement posture with heightened secondary sanctions risk for non-U.S. companies, which are now on notice to sever ties with Iran. The accompanying FinCEN Section 311 action against a UAE bank demonstrates a broader use of regulatory tools to isolate Iran from the global financial system. Companies with any direct or indirect exposure to Iran should immediately review and update their compliance programs and screening protocols, as U.
…
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed 'Regulation Crypto Assets,' a new framework creating tailored offering exemptions and a safe harbor for digital asset investment contracts.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a new framework intended to create a viable compliance path for cryptoasset offerings. The proposal, enjoying unified support from the commissioners, marks a significant shift from the prior administration's enforcement-led approach. It introduces two tailored offering exemptions: a "Startup Exemption" for raises up to $5 million and a tiered "Fundraising Exemption," modeled on Regulation A, for raises up to $75 million annually. It also establishes a safe harbor allowing an issuer to certify when its token is no longer part of an investment contract, addressing a core uncertainty under the Howey test.
…
A unanimous Supreme Court held the SEC may recover a defendant's wrongful gains regardless of investor financial loss, but a concurrence questions whether disgorgement now triggers a right to a jury trial.
In Sripetch v. SEC, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the Securities and Exchange Commission may obtain disgorgement of a defendant's ill-gotten gains without proving that investors suffered a corresponding financial loss. Writing for the Court, Justice Gorsuch grounded the decision in traditional equitable principles, explaining that disgorgement is measured by the wrongdoer's gain, not the victim's loss. The ruling resolves a circuit split in the SEC's favor, preserving a powerful enforcement tool used to recover billions annually and foreclosing a key defense in cases like market manipulation or pump-and-dump schemes where proving investor harm is difficult.
…
The Financial Conduct Authority has eliminated the mandatory seven-day waiting period between prospectus and research publication and dropped equal information sharing rules for unconnected analysts to reduce costs and execution risk.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has implemented significant deregulatory changes to the equity IPO process, effective August 5, 2026, via its Policy Statement PS26/16. The reforms remove two key requirements introduced in 2018: the mandatory seven-day gap between the publication of a prospectus and connected research, and the obligation to share the same information with unconnected analysts. The FCA concluded the prior regime failed to achieve its goals, as few unconnected analyst reports were published, while the rules added market risk and compliance costs, placing UK listings at a competitive disadvantage. The changes are expected to shorten the IPO timeline, reduce execution risk, and lower costs for issuers. Issuers and their advisers should immediately update internal IPO process documentation and precedent timetables. The FCA will consider further reforms, including a potential relaxation of guidance on pre-mandate issuer/analyst interactions.
The two agencies have established a new framework for sharing non-public information, signaling a potential uptick in SEC enforcement actions concerning clinical trial data, product approvals, and safety matters.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on August 31, 2026, to formalize and enhance cooperation and information sharing. The agreement establishes a direct channel for the agencies to exchange non-public information, increasing the likelihood that the SEC will scrutinize company disclosures against data submitted to the FDA.
For sophisticated counsel and their clients in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and medical device sectors, this signals a heightened risk of enforcement actions. Discrepancies between statements to investors and filings with the FDA regarding clinical trials, regulatory approval status, or product safety could become a primary source for SEC investigations. The agencies have created dedicated points of contact to streamline the process. FDA-regulated public companies should immediately review their disclosure controls and procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy across all regulatory and financial reporting. Counsel should monitor for an expected increase in SEC filing r
…
New interim guidance extends the safe harbor for claiming carbon-capture tax credits, expands it to enhanced oil and gas recovery projects, and clarifies its use for recapture calculations.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2026-50, significantly expanding and extending an interim safe harbor for taxpayers claiming the Section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture and sequestration. The guidance responds to continued uncertainty caused by the EPA's proposal to remove certain reporting obligations (under Subpart RR) and its failure to launch its electronic reporting tool for the 2025 reporting year.
Sophisticated counsel should note three key changes. The relief is now extended to carbon oxide used as a tertiary injectant in qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery projects. The notice also confirms that taxpayers can rely on the safe harbor to determine amounts subject to recapture. Finally, the safe harbor's availability is extended beyond calendar year 2025, now applying to any year the EPA's reporting tool is not launched by March 31 of the following year, until further guidance is issued. This provides crucial planning certainty for clients developing and financing long-term carbon-capture projects.
…
In a case of first impression, the court adopted a new "transmit requirement" for direct copyright infringement claims, deepening a circuit split over the legality of embedding online content.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected the Ninth Circuit's long-standing "server test" for determining direct copyright infringement from embedded online content. In Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., the court established a new "transmit requirement," which asks which party's server transmitted the content to the end user and whether that transmission was authorized. This holding deepens a circuit split on a critical issue for any company operating a website that displays third-party material, from news aggregators to social media platforms. While the Fifth Circuit suggested its test may often produce similar results to the server test, the different legal reasoning creates significant uncertainty and risk for platforms operating nationwide. The court also found that URLs can, in some cases, qualify as "copyright management information" under the DMCA, creating another potential cause of action. The growing disagreement among federal circuits makes it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately intervene to establish a national stand
…
The legal and commercial strategy for AI in the music industry is shifting from infringement lawsuits to the development of complex licensing frameworks that govern model training and output.
The music industry's approach to artificial intelligence is evolving from litigation over unauthorized data scraping and deepfakes toward building a market for licensed uses. This shift reflects a maturing ecosystem where stakeholders are exploring workable deal structures rather than relying solely on legal challenges. Sophisticated counsel for both AI developers and rights holders must now navigate emerging multi-layered permission frameworks. These frameworks distinguish between rights for training AI models on existing catalogs and rights governing the output, such as fan remixes, professional productions, or sound-alikes prompted by users.
…
The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's finding that the False Claims Act's qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause, but remanded other Article II challenges for further review.
The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's unprecedented 2024 decision that had found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the appellate court held that private relators are not "Officers of the United States" requiring presidential appointment, aligning its view with every other circuit to have considered the question and resolving a threat to the government's primary anti-fraud tool.
…
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a landmark district court ruling, holding that False Claims Act whistleblowers are not "officers" under the Appointments Clause and allowing their suits to proceed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, has reversed a district court decision that struck down the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provisions as unconstitutional. The lower court had reasoned that private relators (whistleblowers) act as "officers of the United States" and therefore must be appointed in accordance with Article II’s Appointments Clause. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed, holding that a relator does not occupy a "continuing position established by law" because their role is temporary, personal to a specific case, and not compensated by a government salary.
…
A new report proposes extending corporate criminal liability to online platforms that fail to prevent fraud committed by their users, a significant expansion of the 'failure to prevent' model.
A report by Jonathan Fisher KC, 'Fraud in the Digital Age,' proposes creating a new corporate criminal offense in the UK for providers of regulated user-to-user services who fail to prevent fraud committed by users on their platforms. The proposal aims to close a perceived gap in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), whose 'failure to prevent fraud' offense applies only to fraud by a company's associates, not by independent third-party users.
If adopted, this would represent a material expansion of corporate criminal liability, making businesses responsible for offenses by people over whom they have no conventional control. The proposal would sit alongside the UK's new Online Safety Act 2023, which already imposes extensive regulatory duties on platforms to address illegal content, including fraud, backed by fines of up to 10% of global revenue. The government has not yet endorsed the proposal but is considering it.
…
The Department of Justice’s new National Fraud Enforcement Division will prioritize data-driven prosecutions targeting telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, and other healthcare schemes.
The Department of Justice’s recently formed National Fraud Enforcement Division has identified healthcare fraud as a primary enforcement priority. According to a memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald, the division will deploy advanced data analytics to proactively detect and prosecute fraudulent schemes in high-risk areas. These include telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, controlled substance diversion, and deceptive marketing of healthcare services.
…
Reversing a novel district court ruling, the panel held that private relators are not 'Officers of the United States' and their lawsuits do not violate the Appointments Clause.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed a district court decision that found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the panel held that private relators who sue on behalf of the government are not 'Officers of the United States' under Article II's Appointments Clause. The decision overturns a first-of-its-kind ruling from the Middle District of Florida and aligns the Eleventh Circuit with every other appellate court to have considered the issue. The ruling restores the status quo for FCA defendants and eliminates, for now, a potent defense in the Eleventh Circuit, a major venue for these cases. However, the constitutional fight is not over. The panel remanded the case for the district court to consider the defendant's other constitutional challenges based on the Take Care and Vesting Clauses. Counsel should also monitor a similar pending case in the Third Circuit. Despite the current unanimity among the circuits, recent comments from several Supreme Court justices sugg
…
The Department of Justice declined to prosecute a healthcare management company that self-disclosed fraud, while simultaneously indicting its former CEO for the scheme.
The Department of Justice has declined to prosecute Campus Eye Management Holdings under its new Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP), marking the first such declination for a healthcare company. The declination was granted after the company voluntarily disclosed misconduct, fully cooperated with investigators, and took remedial action, including agreeing to pay $1 million to affected patients. This resolution is a critical data point for corporate counsel and investors, as it demonstrates the tangible benefits of self-reporting under the new policy. However, it also powerfully illustrates the DOJ's focus on individual accountability. Concurrent with the corporate declination, the department unsealed a seven-count indictment against Campus Eye's founder and former CEO for allegedly orchestrating the $3.4 million Medicare billing fraud and kickback scheme. The case serves as a clear warning and a roadmap, signaling that while a company can earn leniency through cooperation, individuals responsible for the misconduct will be aggressively pursued. It highligh
…
Grade 3 — worth a glance, not the full analysis.
- Veloxis pays $46M DOJ settlement for kickbacks on transplant drug
Veloxis Pharmaceuticals settles criminal and civil DOJ allegations involving $46M in kickbacks to kidney transplant professionals to induce Envarsus prescriptions, with a three-year deferred prosecution agreement.
- CARB releases 2026 GHG reporting guidance and opens voluntary platform
California Air Resources Board has published additional guidance for SB 253 greenhouse gas emissions reporting due November 10, 2026, along with a new voluntary intake platform.
- Takeda Sues Alvotech Over Vedolizumab Biosimilar
In its second recent suit defending ENTYVIO®, Takeda alleges Alvotech's proposed vedolizumab biosimilar infringes six patents covering methods of treatment.
- DTSA circuit splits shape trade secret litigation outcomes
Federal appellate courts are sharply divided on DTSA pleading standards, avoided-costs damages, and per-trade-secret damages apportionment—making case venue a critical strategic decision.
- California Data Center Bills Shift Grid Costs to Developers
California's SB 886 and AB 2383 require qualifying data centers to pay for grid upgrades and follow new CPUC tariffs, creating early-diligence obligations and exit penalties.
- FCC Seeks Comment on Spectrum for Space Launches
The US Federal Communications Commission has issued a notice seeking public comment on allocating dedicated radio spectrum to support communications for commercial and private space launches.
- SEC's EDGAR Next Platform Mandates Annual Filer Confirmation
All public companies and Section 16 insiders must complete an annual confirmation on the SEC's EDGAR Next platform to maintain filing access, with account deactivation as the penalty for non-compliance after a grace period.
- FDA accepts Alvotech/Teva second interchangeable Entyvio biosimilar application
The FDA accepted an aBLA for AVT80, a subcutaneous formulation of Alvotech and Teva's proposed interchangeable vedolizumab biosimilar, marking their second biosimilar candidate for Takeda's $3.89B drug.
- Multinationals Face Confusion Over IEEPA Tariff Refunds for Finally Liquidated Entries
Importers are uncertain about the status of International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariff refunds for entries more than 80 days beyond liquidation, which fall outside CAPE Phase 1 processing.
- Middle East PE and Private Credit Deal Toolkit Expands
Middle East deal activity surges 33% as investors deploy PE and private credit structures with enhanced compliance and exit planning, per White & Case analysis.
- German Commercial Courts Offer Arbitration Alternative for M&A Disputes
New specialized senates at Germany's Higher Regional Courts, operational since April 2025, provide a domestic forum for complex commercial and post-M&A disputes traditionally handled through arbitration.
- faa-beyond-phase-2-opens-sltt-lead-participant-applications
The FAA launched BEYOND Phase 2 on August 27, 2026, seeking up to eight new state, local, tribal, and territorial lead participants for advanced UAS integration, with a September 10, 2026 deadline.
- Texas Business Court Confirms Jurisdiction in Pre-Suit Discovery
In a case of first impression, the new commercial court held that a Rule 202 petition to investigate claims before filing a lawsuit qualifies as a removable 'action' under its jurisdictional statute.
- UK Government adopts Fisher disclosure reforms for AI-assisted criminal review
The Burnham Government has endorsed Jonathan Fisher KC's disclosure overhaul, enabling AI technology in criminal case document review while maintaining human accountability.
- CMS Proposes RAPID Pathway to Accelerate Medicare Coverage for Breakthrough Devices
CMS has proposed a new coverage pathway that would issue National Coverage Determinations on the same day FDA grants market authorization for qualifying Breakthrough Devices, with final coverage decisions within 60-90 days.
- Spain drafts data centre energy rules with 80% renewable mandate
Spain's Ministry for Ecological Transition published a Draft Royal Decree requiring data centres with 1 MW+ access capacity to meet renewable energy, efficiency, and digital sovereignty requirements for grid permits.
- California Legislature, Appellate Court Clarify Invasion of Privacy Act
California's legislature and an appellate court have provided new clarity on the state's Invasion of Privacy Act, offering guidance on key privacy protections.
- UK Bribery Act 2010: A Corporate Compliance Guide
This guide outlines the key offenses, jurisdictional reach, and the 'adequate procedures' defense under the UK's far-reaching anti-corruption law.
- Mexican Insurers Can Control CERPIs Under LISF Framework
Mexican law expressly permits insurance institutions to control their own CERPI investment vehicles, subject to concentration limits and prudential calibration under the solvency regime.
- Australian court terminates DOCA over director's undisclosed capital raise talks
In Australian Agricultural Opportunities v Agripower Australia [2026] FCA 777, the Federal Court terminated a deed of company arrangement where administrators failed to disclose months of director negotiations with Saudi investment funds.
- UK Bear Hug Bids Show Three Distinct Patterns
Analysis of eleven UK public takeover "bear hugs" in 2026 reveals price increases of median 18.5% drive recommendations, while substantial pre-existing stakes enable hostile approaches.
- CA Courts Clarify 'Empty Chair' Defense Preservation
Recent California appellate decisions offer a clearer path for defendants to preserve the ability to attribute fault to a co-defendant who wins summary judgment.
- Bank of England gets new payments innovation objective
Government will amend Financial Services and Markets Bill to give BoE statutory objective supporting payments systems innovation, extending existing innovation mandate from CCPs and CSDs to payment systems.
- AI HR Vendor Agreements: Key Contracting Provisions
Labor and employment lawyers should ensure HR AI vendor contracts address data ownership, bias testing, change management, and emerging state liability frameworks.
- Texas Senate signals data center water use crackdown
Texas senators indicated strong support for prohibiting evaporative cooling, mandating monthly water-use reporting and expanding local government authority over data center development ahead of the 2027 legislative session.
- Russia Sanctions Developments for August 2026 Reviewed
A law firm digest summarizes recent changes to sanctions regimes targeting Russia, offering an overview for specialists tracking the complex and evolving restrictions.
- SEVP Increases CPT Scrutiny for F-1 Student Authorizations
SEVP's August 2026 broadcast messages signal heightened enforcement of Curricular Practical Training requirements, directing schools to verify training is integral to students' curricula.
- Guide to Australia's Anti-Bribery and Corruption Laws
This guide provides a comprehensive overview of Australia's legal framework for foreign and domestic bribery, including the new 'failure to prevent' offense, and offers practical tips for managing risk.
- Third Circuit Vacates Fee Award After Parties Settle on Appeal
The court found rare "exceptional circumstances" warranting vacatur because its own precedential ruling on the legal standard for fee awards remained intact, preserving the public interest.
- Saudi Arabia Issues New Corporate Rules for Special Economic Zones
ECZA approves Companies Rules, Companies Register Rules, and Trade Names Rules for Jazan, Ras Al-Khair, King Abdullah Economic City, and Cloud Computing SEZs, exempting zone companies from Saudi Companies Law.
- States Shift Accessibility Compliance Burden to Government Tech Vendors
Companies providing digital tools to state and local governments should prepare for increased accessibility documentation requirements as DOJ WCAG compliance deadlines approach in 2027-2028.
- Japan Sets New Cybersecurity Standard for Power Grid Connections
Beginning in April 2027, equipment for new and existing Japanese solar and battery storage facilities must meet a new JC-STAR cybersecurity certification, posing challenges for operators relying on uncertified components.
- IRS Notice 2026-48 Previews Saver's Match Implementation
Treasury and IRS outline how the new Saver's Match program will work starting in 2027, confirming plans are not required to accept contributions but will need to separately track them.
- 5th Cir. Upholds Appellate Jurisdiction After Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissal
A plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of remaining claims to appeal an earlier adverse ruling creates a final appealable order, the Fifth Circuit held in a copyright case.
- Maryland FAMLI employer registration now open
Maryland employers with at least one in-state employee must register for the state's new Family and Medical Leave Insurance program by year-end.
- Guide to Mitigating 401(k) Manual Data-Entry Risks
Even in highly automated 401(k) plan administration systems, manual touchpoints for non-routine transactions create significant operational and compliance risks.
- FinCEN Details Red Flags for Student Aid Fraud
A new FinCEN alert details red flags for identifying fraud related to federal student aid programs, signaling heightened regulatory expectations for banks' compliance and reporting efforts under the BSA.
- DLA Contractor Acquisitions: Regulatory Diligence Guide for PE
PE buyers face unique regulatory risks when acquiring Defense Logistics Agency contractors—from False Claims Act exposure to CMMC readiness and small-business status.
- UK Delays and Narrows Commercial Property Energy Efficiency Rules
The UK government has scrapped a planned 2027 interim energy efficiency milestone for commercial properties, delaying the next required upgrade to 2031 and limiting its scope to larger buildings.
- CMS Proposes RAPID Coverage Pathway for Breakthrough Devices
CMS's new RAPID pathway would give Medicare beneficiaries expedited access to certain breakthrough medical devices, releasing coverage determinations on the same day as FDA market authorization.
- UK EAT clarifies consent, intoxication in sexual harassment claims
The EAT in AB v GH Limited held consent is relevant to whether conduct was "unwanted" under Equality Act 2010, but not a separate test—amid employer duty changes from October 30, 2026.
- Proposal Urges States to Form New Financial Supervision Offices
A nonprofit has proposed that state financial regulators create dedicated policy offices to more aggressively and continuously monitor consumer financial products, filling a perceived void left by the CFPB.
- Fisher II proposes sweeping UK fraud enforcement reforms
Jonathan Fisher KC's second report recommends 47 changes including whistleblower rewards, expanded SFO powers, new summary offences and stiffer sentences to address fragmented and sluggish UK fraud enforcement.
- Five Strategies for Managing U.S. Tariff Risk and Compliance
With tariff policy in flux, courts striking down actions, and DOJ prioritizing customs fraud enforcement, companies face heightened exposure and should reassess supply agreements, classification practices, and prior-disclosure options.
- PTAB Issues Precedential OTDP Decision; USPTO Updates Patent Bar
The PTAB issued a precedential decision on obviousness-type double patenting and reclassified Biomedical Science for patent bar eligibility, while also releasing its monthly decision digest for September 2026.
- Fed. Circ. Clarifies Patent Venue, Jurisdiction Rules
A US district court may decide patent ineligibility after dismissing for improper venue, and a settlement dispute over patent reexamination "survival" belongs in a regional circuit court, not the Federal Circuit.
- Congress Delays Hemp THC Restrictions Until December 11
Congress approved a one-month delay of federal hemp-derived THC restrictions, moving the effective date from November 12 to December 11, 2026, but synthetic cannabinoids remain on the original timeline.
- Eleventh Circuit rejects Appointments Clause challenge to FCA qui tam provisions
The Eleventh Circuit held that False Claims Act relators are not "officers of the United States" requiring presidential appointment, aligning with five other circuits but leaving Take Care and Vesting Clause challenges alive on remand.
- Federal Circuit Affirms Patent Non-Infringement on Claim Construction
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a non-infringement judgment, holding that the patent-claim phrase 'pH between 7.0 and 9.0' requires the pH to be maintained in the interval separating the two values.