Cicero Intelligent Minds

DROPLETS

AmLaw 100 Legal Intelligence — Distilled
Friday, September 4, 202657 featured49 also noted40 firms20 practice areasgrade 3–5
Quick Scan — Why It Matters
Latham & WatkinsSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
SEC Proposes New Exemptions and Safe Harbor for Crypto Offerings

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed 'Regulation Crypto Assets,' a new framework creating tailored offering exemptions and a safe harbor for digital asset investment contracts.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a new framework intended to create a viable compliance path for cryptoasset offerings. The proposal, enjoying unified support from the commissioners, marks a significant shift from the prior administration's enforcement-led approach. It introduces two tailored offering exemptions: a "Startup Exemption" for raises up to $5 million and a tiered "Fundraising Exemption," modeled on Regulation A, for raises up to $75 million annually. It also establishes a safe harbor allowing an issuer to certify when its token is no longer part of an investment contract, addressing a core uncertainty under the Howey test.

Read the full dispatch →
Morrison & FoersterInternational Trade / Tariffs+ Expand
FCC Adds Foreign-Made Advanced Robotics to 'Covered List'

The Federal Communications Commission has effectively barred new models of foreign-produced advanced robotic devices from the U.S. market, citing national security risks.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on July 28, 2026, added foreign-produced "advanced robotic devices" to its Covered List, a roster of equipment deemed to pose an unacceptable national security risk. Under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, listed equipment cannot receive FCC authorization, effectively barring new or modified models from being imported or sold in the U.S. The action, widely seen as targeting Chinese technology, follows similar prohibitions on drones, routers, and power inverters.

Read the full dispatch →
DLA PiperEnvironment / ESG / Climate+ Expand
US Challenges EU's ESG Rules, Citing Burdens on Commerce

In a formal letter to the EU, the US government warned it will take "any actions necessary" to shield US businesses from the extraterritorial impact and reporting burdens of the CSDDD and CSRD.

The US government has formally challenged the European Union's ambitious sustainability regulations, arguing they create unreasonable burdens for American commerce. In a letter to the EU, the US Mission stated that the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) have an adverse extraterritorial impact on US businesses. The US objects to the directives' "double materiality" standard and extensive supply-chain diligence obligations, which it claims will harm the competitiveness of US firms, even those with minimal EU market links. The letter warns that the US will take "any actions necessary" to address these concerns. This executive branch action is mirrored by a legislative proposal, the Stop EU Overreach Act, which would require the US Trade Representative to investigate the EU rules as a potentially unfair trade practice. Counsel for multinational clients should monitor the EU's response and the potential for an escalating trade dispute while continuing to prepare for the directives' complex compliance regimes.

Read the full dispatch →
Orrick, Herrington & SutcliffeFinancial Regulation+ Expand
FinCEN Ends Beneficial Ownership Reporting for US Companies

The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has issued a final rule permanently ending Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership reporting obligations for all U.S. companies and persons.

The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a final rule that permanently exempts all U.S. companies and persons from the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The rule, effective August 14, 2026, makes permanent the exemptions introduced in a March 2025 interim rule. This action represents a monumental reversal of a major compliance regime that was expected to affect over 32 million U.S. entities. Following a series of constitutional challenges and injunctions against the CTA, FinCEN has now narrowed the reporting obligation to only foreign companies registered to do business in the United States. The agency estimates only 28,000 entities will now be required to report. Furthermore, FinCEN announced it will delete all BOI previously reported by U.S. persons from its database. While this relieves domestic companies of a significant burden, foreign entities operating in the U.S. must still evaluate their reporting obligations for non-U.S. beneficial owners.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsFintech / Crypto+ Expand
US Treasury Proposes Rules for Stablecoin Issuance Under GENIUS Act

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking offers the first detailed look at how regulators will define who must obtain a federal license to issue or sell payment stablecoins in the United States.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued a long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Enacted in July 2025, the Act creates a comprehensive federal licensing and supervisory framework for payment stablecoins. This NPRM proposes definitions for crucial jurisdictional terms, including what it means to “issue a payment stablecoin in the United States” and to “offer or sell” one to a person in the U.S. These definitions are fundamental for the digital asset industry, as they will determine which issuers must obtain a federal license starting in January 2027 and which stablecoins digital asset service providers can lawfully offer to U.S. customers. The rules will significantly impact both domestic and foreign-based issuers and exchanges seeking access to the American market. The Treasury has opened a 60-day public comment period, and market participants are expected to weigh in heavily on the proposal, which will shape the future of the U.S. stablecoin landscape.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
SCOTUS: SEC Disgorgement Does Not Require Investor Loss

A unanimous Supreme Court held the SEC may recover a defendant's wrongful gains regardless of investor financial loss, but a concurrence questions whether disgorgement now triggers a right to a jury trial.

In Sripetch v. SEC, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the Securities and Exchange Commission may obtain disgorgement of a defendant's ill-gotten gains without proving that investors suffered a corresponding financial loss. Writing for the Court, Justice Gorsuch grounded the decision in traditional equitable principles, explaining that disgorgement is measured by the wrongdoer's gain, not the victim's loss. The ruling resolves a circuit split in the SEC's favor, preserving a powerful enforcement tool used to recover billions annually and foreclosing a key defense in cases like market manipulation or pump-and-dump schemes where proving investor harm is difficult.

Read the full dispatch →
Husch BlackwellFinancial Regulation+ Expand
CFTC to Act on Crypto Regulation if Congress Stalls

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig directed staff to develop a crypto-asset market structure under existing authority, creating a parallel regulatory track should the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act fail to pass the Senate.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig has formally directed agency staff to begin drafting rules for a crypto-asset market structure under the CFTC’s existing statutory authority. The announcement, made during an Innovation Advisory Committee meeting, signals a significant strategic shift, establishing an administrative path for regulation that can proceed independently if the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act does not pass in the Senate.

Read the full dispatch →
Goodwin ProcterCorporate / M&A+ Expand
Delaware Court Denies Safe Harbor in First Test of New DGCL 144

The Court of Chancery held for the first time that a board's "grossly negligent" process in managing a conflicted director can defeat the DGCL Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor, even with a disinterested majority vote.

In its first interpretation of amended Delaware General Corporation Law Section 144, the Court of Chancery in 'Dodiya v. Franklin' denied a motion to dismiss, holding that safe-harbor protection for a conflicted transaction was unavailable at the pleading stage. The court found it "reasonably conceivable" that the target's board acted with gross negligence by restoring a conflicted director's access to confidential sale-process information, despite knowing he had previously leaked material nonpublic data to his father, the ultimate acquirer. This decision establishes that the Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor requires not just a disinterested majority vote, but a process conducted "in good faith and without gross negligence." For corporate counsel and dealmakers, this ruling underscores that process controls are critical; merely walling off a conflicted director on paper is insufficient if not enforced. The court also found the stockholder-vote safe harbor under Section 144(a)(2) was unavailable because the proxy statement allegedly misrepresented the conflicted director's exclusion from

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoieFinancial Regulation+ Expand
FinCEN Final Rule Permanently Exempts Domestic Entities from CTA

FinCEN's August 2026 final rule permanently removes domestic entities and U.S. persons from CTA reporting while significantly narrowing foreign company obligations.

FinCEN's August 14, 2026 final rule marks a fundamental restructuring of the Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership reporting regime. Domestic entities created under U.S. state or tribal law are permanently removed from the definition of "reporting company," eliminating both initial filing requirements and ongoing update obligations. U.S. persons are similarly exempt from beneficial owner or company applicant status, meaning foreign reporting companies need not collect their personal identifying information. Notably, FinCEN will conduct a targeted purge of previously submitted domestic company and U.S. person data from its Beneficial Ownership IT System.

Read the full dispatch →
PolsinelliEmployment / Labor+ Expand
OFCCP Ends Contractor Disability Self-ID, 7% Goal

A new final rule effective Sept. 21, 2026, removes the long-standing requirement for federal contractors to use Form CC-305 and conduct a 7% utilization analysis, though core nondiscrimination obligations remain.

The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued a final rule that removes long-standing disability affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. Effective September 21, 2026, the rule eliminates the 7% disability utilization goal, the associated annual utilization analysis, and the mandatory use of Form CC-305 for inviting applicants and employees to self-identify as having a disability.

This change overhauls a compliance framework that has been in place for more than a decade, easing certain specific data-collection and analytical burdens. However, the rule does not alter contractors' core nondiscrimination duties under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act. Contractors must still take affirmative action to employ and advance qualified individuals with disabilities and maintain written affirmative action programs where required.

Read the full dispatch →
Akin GumpWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
11th Circ. Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to FCA Qui Tam Actions

The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's finding that the False Claims Act's qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause, but remanded other Article II challenges for further review.

The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's unprecedented 2024 decision that had found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the appellate court held that private relators are not "Officers of the United States" requiring presidential appointment, aligning its view with every other circuit to have considered the question and resolving a threat to the government's primary anti-fraud tool.

Read the full dispatch →
White & CaseInternational Trade / Tariffs+ Expand
Mexico Proposes CFIUS-Style National Security Review for Foreign Investment

A new presidential bill would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing authorization regime for foreign acquisitions of over 49% in designated sensitive sectors.

Mexico's executive branch has introduced a bill to establish a formal national security screening process for foreign direct investment (FDI), modeled on the CFIUS regime in the United States. If enacted, the law would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing filing for foreign acquisitions of more than 49% equity in Mexican companies operating in broadly defined "sensitive sectors" including critical technology, energy, and strategic infrastructure.

Read the full dispatch →
Ropes & GrayWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
11th Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of FCA Qui Tam Provisions

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a landmark district court ruling, holding that False Claims Act whistleblowers are not "officers" under the Appointments Clause and allowing their suits to proceed.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, has reversed a district court decision that struck down the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provisions as unconstitutional. The lower court had reasoned that private relators (whistleblowers) act as "officers of the United States" and therefore must be appointed in accordance with Article II’s Appointments Clause. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed, holding that a relator does not occupy a "continuing position established by law" because their role is temporary, personal to a specific case, and not compensated by a government salary.

Read the full dispatch →
McDermott Will & EmeryEmployment / Labor+ Expand
DOL Proposes E-Delivery Safe Harbor for Health Plans

A proposed notice-and-access framework for ERISA group health plan disclosures would expand electronic delivery options but create a third set of rules alongside those for retirement and other welfare plans.

The US Department of Labor has proposed a new optional safe harbor to allow electronic delivery of ERISA-required group health plan disclosures. The rule, proposed July 23, 2026, would establish a “notice-and-access” framework similar to that available for retirement plans, permitting administrators to post documents online and send a notice of internet availability. This could significantly reduce administrative burdens and costs for employers, especially for reaching employees without regular work-related computer access, retirees, and other beneficiaries who provide an electronic address.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsLitigation / Appellate+ Expand
English Court Clarifies Anti-Suit Injunctions in Sanctions Cases

Two recent Court of Appeal decisions chart the boundaries for granting anti-suit injunctions against foreign proceedings, offering key lessons on drafting and dispute strategy for Russia-related matters.

In two recent decisions, the UK Court of Appeal clarified the dividing line for granting anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) to block Russian legal proceedings arising from sanctions. The court refused an ASI in FH Holding v UniCredit, where a foreclosure action was brought in Moscow under a specific Russian-law mortgage agreement, finding this did not breach a Vienna arbitration clause in a related facility agreement. Conversely, in JP Morgan v VTB, it granted an ASI to stop Russian tort claims, deeming them a vexatious attempt to circumvent London arbitration agreements and UK sanctions using purpose-built Russian laws.

Read the full dispatch →
Proskauer RoseFinancial Regulation+ Expand
9th Cir. Ruling on Sports-Prediction Contracts Creates Circuit Split

The Ninth Circuit held that sports-related event contracts are not federally regulated swaps, clearing the way for state gaming laws and directly conflicting with a recent Third Circuit decision.

The Ninth Circuit ruled in KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad that sports event prediction contracts are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), exposing them to state-level gaming regulation. The decision allows Nevada to apply its gaming laws to operator Kalshi and rejects the argument that the products fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which had supported Kalshi as an amicus.

This ruling matters because it creates a direct conflict with an April 2026 Third Circuit decision that found such contracts were indeed federally regulated swaps preempting state law. The split introduces significant legal uncertainty for the fast-growing prediction-market industry, which now faces a fractured regulatory landscape. For clients in this sector, the key question is whether they will be governed by a single federal regulator or a complex patchwork of state gaming laws.

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoieEnvironment / ESG / Climate+ Expand
Australia Releases Voluntary Climate Transition Plan Guide

The Australian government published voluntary guidance for corporate climate transition planning, establishing a national good-practice standard aligned with international frameworks.

The Australian government has published its anticipated voluntary guidance on climate-related transition planning. Released on August 24, 2026, the framework is designed to help organizations develop strategies for the net-zero transition and adapt to the physical impacts of climate change. The guidance sets out a four-stage planning cycle and a three-tier proportionality framework, allowing companies to tailor their approach based on their climate risk exposure and complexity.

Read the full dispatch →
K&L GatesFinancial Regulation+ Expand
UK Replaces PRIIPs/UCITS Disclosures With New CCI Regime

Effective April 2026, a new UK framework for consumer composite investments requires manufacturers and distributors, including non-UK firms, to replace familiar KIIDs with a new CCI Product Summary by June 2027.

The UK has implemented a significant new disclosure framework for consumer composite investments (CCIs), replacing the familiar PRIIPs and UCITS key information documents (KIDs). Effective April 6, 2026, with a transition period until June 7, 2027, the rules require firms marketing products like funds, structured products, and derivatives to UK retail investors to adopt a new 'CCI Product Summary.' Sophisticated counsel must note the regime's broad extraterritorial reach, which applies to non-UK manufacturers and distributors, bringing many previously unregulated entities under the Financial Conduct Authority's direct supervision for these activities. The new framework also mandates that manufacturers provide machine-readable 'Core Information Disclosure' to distributors. While the format for the new Product Summary is less prescriptive than the old KIDs, it includes specific methodologies for calculating and presenting risk, return, and cost information. Firms must now identify all in-scope products, develop new disclosure templates, and ensure their data processes can meet the upda

Read the full dispatch →
Davis Wright TremaineEnergy / Renewables+ Expand
Washington Launches WETA to Tackle Transmission Bottlenecks

Washington's new Electric Transmission Authority will coordinate siting, financing, and eminent domain for high-priority corridors to move eastern renewables west of the Cascades.

Governor Inslee signed SB 6355 in March, creating the Washington Electric Transmission Authority (WETA), which took effect in June. WETA is an independent body with a 10-member gubernatorial board to be seated by January 1, 2027, and an executive director to be hired by June 30, 2027. Its remit is to coordinate transmission planning across utilities, BPA, tribes, and developers in corridors identified by the Department of Commerce, with powers to support permitting, partner with developers, own facilities on a transitional basis, and—critically—exercise eminent domain under RCW 8.04 to clear right-of-way disputes that have stalled projects. The authority is not a financing entity; it routes capital needs to the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority. Counsel should watch three near-term developments: the December 1, 2026 tribal consultation framework report, the January 2027 legislative session that may address SEPA exclusions for reconductoring and essential public facility designation, and the Department of Commerce's high-priority corridor designation process, all of wh

Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth ShawEmployment / Labor+ Expand
EEOC adopts FY 2026–2030 strategic plan: enforcement tempo, systemic focus

The final plan formalizes a 97% targeted-relief target, 90% litigation-win floor, and resource concentration on ten-plus-employee systemic cases through 2030.

The EEOC has formally adopted its Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2026–2030, the institutional counterpart to its National Enforcement Plan and the metric framework that will govern agency operations for the next five years. Three strategic goals drive the plan: strategic law enforcement, outreach and training, and organizational excellence, supported by seventeen performance measures with hard numerical targets. Key measures employers should track include a 97% rate for non-monetary targeted equitable relief in conciliation and litigation outcomes, a 90% favorable resolution rate in enforcement suits, and a refocused Systemic Program keyed to matters involving ten or more aggrieved individuals, with explicit retention of Commissioner Charges and directed investigations as tools. The plan also commits the agency to enhanced conciliation monitoring, faster intake processing (10% reduction by FY 2030), a 95% staffing target, and quarterly stakeholder satisfaction tracking, signaling a more disciplined and accountable EEOC. Coupled with the approximately 28% rise in annual private-secto

Read the full dispatch →
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrFDA / Life Sciences Regulatory+ Expand
SEC, FDA Ink Deal to Share Non-Public Company Data

A new memorandum of understanding gives the SEC a formal channel to obtain confidential FDA records, increasing scrutiny of public disclosures by life sciences companies.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration have established a formal framework for sharing non-public information. An August 31, 2026, memorandum of understanding (MOU) gives the SEC’s divisions of Enforcement and Corporation Finance a direct channel to request and receive confidential records from the FDA concerning regulated public companies. For life sciences and other FDA-regulated issuers, this significantly raises the stakes for public communications. The SEC can now more easily cross-reference a company's investor-facing statements—regarding clinical trial results, product approval timelines, or the substance of agency meetings—against the FDA's own internal records. The MOU is part of a broader FDA transparency initiative, which includes the recent practice of publishing Complete Response Letters. The agreement heightens the risk of SEC scrutiny and potential enforcement action for disclosures that are perceived as incomplete, inconsistent, or more favorable than the underlying regulatory communications warrant. Companies must ensure all

Read the full dispatch →
McDermott Will & EmeryIP / Patent+ Expand
CAFC Rejects Advocacy Group Standing in Patent Language Suit

The Federal Circuit held that inventor-advocacy groups lack Article III standing to sue the USPTO over allegedly misleading patent-grant language, finding that diverting resources to educate members is not a legally cognizable injury.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a suit by inventor advocacy groups challenging the "right to exclude" language on US patent grants. In US Inventor, Inc. v. Squires, the plaintiffs argued this language became misleading after the Supreme Court's eBay v. MercExchange decision made injunctive relief for infringement discretionary. The court found the groups lacked both organizational and associational standing.

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightTax+ Expand
Treasury Expands Safe Harbor for 45Q Carbon-Capture Credit

New interim guidance extends the safe harbor for claiming carbon-capture tax credits, expands it to enhanced oil and gas recovery projects, and clarifies its use for recapture calculations.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2026-50, significantly expanding and extending an interim safe harbor for taxpayers claiming the Section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture and sequestration. The guidance responds to continued uncertainty caused by the EPA's proposal to remove certain reporting obligations (under Subpart RR) and its failure to launch its electronic reporting tool for the 2025 reporting year.

Sophisticated counsel should note three key changes. The relief is now extended to carbon oxide used as a tertiary injectant in qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery projects. The notice also confirms that taxpayers can rely on the safe harbor to determine amounts subject to recapture. Finally, the safe harbor's availability is extended beyond calendar year 2025, now applying to any year the EPA's reporting tool is not launched by March 31 of the following year, until further guidance is issued. This provides crucial planning certainty for clients developing and financing long-term carbon-capture projects.

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightInternational Trade / Tariffs+ Expand
FMC Eyes IMO Net-Zero Framework as Possible Shipping-Act Investigation Target

FMC Chair DiBella signaled the Commission could use its Section 19 authority to probe the IMO's proposed maritime GHG levy, opening a new trade-policy front.

The IMO's proposed Net-Zero Framework would set mandatory GHG limits and emissions pricing across international shipping, with Tier 1 penalties of $100 and Tier 2 penalties of $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent for non-compliant fleets. FMC Chairman DiBella has publicly questioned whether the resulting costs on U.S. cargo would be inflationary and whether the regime would displace existing systems like the EU ETS. She has gone further, suggesting the framework could itself become the subject of an FMC investigation. Under 46 U.S.C. §§ 42101-42109 and 46 C.F.R. Part 550, the FMC can probe foreign laws, regulations, or carrier practices that create conditions unfavorable to U.S. foreign commerce, with remedies ranging from fee equalization and sailing limits to per-voyage penalties up to $1 million and, in extreme cases, requests to deny port entry. Sophisticated shippers, carriers, and counsel should reassess tariff surcharges, service-contract allocation clauses, and exposure to retaliation against flag states, while tracking the IMO's London session, the November intersessional, and t

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
UK Proposal Targets Platforms for User-Committed Fraud

A new report proposes extending corporate criminal liability to online platforms that fail to prevent fraud committed by their users, a significant expansion of the 'failure to prevent' model.

A report by Jonathan Fisher KC, 'Fraud in the Digital Age,' proposes creating a new corporate criminal offense in the UK for providers of regulated user-to-user services who fail to prevent fraud committed by users on their platforms. The proposal aims to close a perceived gap in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), whose 'failure to prevent fraud' offense applies only to fraud by a company's associates, not by independent third-party users.

If adopted, this would represent a material expansion of corporate criminal liability, making businesses responsible for offenses by people over whom they have no conventional control. The proposal would sit alongside the UK's new Online Safety Act 2023, which already imposes extensive regulatory duties on platforms to address illegal content, including fraud, backed by fines of up to 10% of global revenue. The government has not yet endorsed the proposal but is considering it.

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightCorporate / M&A+ Expand
Delaware Court Finds Acquiror Fraud in $120M Earnout Dispute

A recent Court of Chancery decision applying the Fortis precedent shows the high cost of extracontractual misrepresentations by a buyer during M&A negotiations, absent a bilateral anti-reliance clause.

The Delaware Court of Chancery awarded a $120 million post-trial verdict against a private equity acquiror for fraud in an earnout dispute, finding the buyer knowingly misrepresented the existing payment volume on its platform—a key metric for the seller's earnout potential. The court found dispositive evidence in the acquiror's own internal emails, where the deal team acknowledged the figures shared with the seller were a "red herring."

Read the full dispatch →
Haynes and BooneTechnology / AI+ Expand
Fifth Circuit Rejects Server Test for Embedded Content

In a case of first impression, the court adopted a new "transmit requirement" for direct copyright infringement claims, deepening a circuit split over the legality of embedding online content.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected the Ninth Circuit's long-standing "server test" for determining direct copyright infringement from embedded online content. In Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., the court established a new "transmit requirement," which asks which party's server transmitted the content to the end user and whether that transmission was authorized. This holding deepens a circuit split on a critical issue for any company operating a website that displays third-party material, from news aggregators to social media platforms. While the Fifth Circuit suggested its test may often produce similar results to the server test, the different legal reasoning creates significant uncertainty and risk for platforms operating nationwide. The court also found that URLs can, in some cases, qualify as "copyright management information" under the DMCA, creating another potential cause of action. The growing disagreement among federal circuits makes it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately intervene to establish a national stand

Read the full dispatch →
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrPrivacy / Data Security+ Expand
Washington AG Report Flags Enforcement Risk, Pushes for New Law

The state's first-ever Data Privacy Report calls for a comprehensive new statute and signals that the attorney general's office may use existing tools to pursue privacy-related harms.

Washington's Attorney General has released the state's first-ever Data Privacy Report, renewing the push for comprehensive privacy legislation after several years of stalled efforts. Although Washington has yet to pass a broad privacy law like those in California or Virginia, its previous proposals have served as influential blueprints for other states, making this development nationally significant. The report identifies four key concerns: overcollection and secondary use of data, weak consent mechanisms and deceptive design, the sale of sensitive data like biometrics and geolocation, and a lack of transparency in the data-broker industry. For businesses, the report signals that the AG’s office is actively monitoring for privacy-related harms and may use existing tools for enforcement, citing FTC actions against data brokers as examples. Counsel should monitor for new legislative proposals and anticipate increased enforcement scrutiny, particularly regarding the handling of sensitive consumer data and the operations of data brokers.

Read the full dispatch →
PolsinelliIP / Patent+ Expand
Fed. Cir. Curbs NPE Pre-Suit Damages in Marking Case

A Federal Circuit decision holds that non-practicing entities must make reasonable efforts to ensure their licensees comply with patent marking rules or risk forfeiting pre-suit damages in future enforcement actions.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of infringement claims in 'VDPP, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.,' ruling that the non-practicing entity (NPE) plaintiff could not claim pre-suit damages because it failed to police its licensees' compliance with patent marking statutes.

This decision is important because it extends the marking obligations under 35 U.S.C. § 287 to an NPE’s licensees, limiting the traditional view that NPEs without products are exempt from marking rules. The court found that VDPP's prior settlement agreements, which licensed the patent to other companies, created a duty for VDPP to make reasonable efforts to ensure those licensees marked their products. The failure to do so—and in one case, expressly waiving the marking requirement—was fatal to its claim for damages preceding actual notice of infringement.

Read the full dispatch →
VenableTechnology / AI+ Expand
AI and Music Industry Pivot from Litigation to Licensing Deals

The legal and commercial strategy for AI in the music industry is shifting from infringement lawsuits to the development of complex licensing frameworks that govern model training and output.

The music industry's approach to artificial intelligence is evolving from litigation over unauthorized data scraping and deepfakes toward building a market for licensed uses. This shift reflects a maturing ecosystem where stakeholders are exploring workable deal structures rather than relying solely on legal challenges. Sophisticated counsel for both AI developers and rights holders must now navigate emerging multi-layered permission frameworks. These frameworks distinguish between rights for training AI models on existing catalogs and rights governing the output, such as fan remixes, professional productions, or sound-alikes prompted by users.

Read the full dispatch →
CooleyInternational Trade / Tariffs+ Expand
White House launches AI-driven crackdown on trade fraud transshipment

DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division names global trade and customs evasion a top priority alongside an AI-enabled CBP enforcement platform targeting China-linked transshipment.

On August 13, 2026, the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released 'The Great Transshipment Scam,' estimating $10 billion to $100+ billion in annual tariff revenue losses from goods routed through Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Mexico, and Cambodia to evade Section 301 tariffs. The same day, DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a memorandum identifying global trade and commerce as a primary enforcement focus, covering illicit transshipment, country-of-origin fraud, undervaluation, sanctions evasion, and foreign forced labor schemes. CBP is building an AI 'detective border' that fuses anomaly detection, link analysis, capacity validation, and physical-to-digital verification to flag suspicious routing, bills of lading, origin claims, and container imaging. NFED plans to reach roughly 500 attorneys and staff by late August and continue expanding for two years, deploying sophisticated data analytics. The memo signals that civil customs exposure can escalate to criminal prosecution, with potential coordination across CBP, DOJ, and Commerce. Sophisticated coun

Read the full dispatch →
Paul HastingsFinancial Regulation+ Expand
Five US Regulators Clarify SAR Customer Communication Rules

Five key U.S. financial regulators have issued a joint statement clarifying the rules on suspicious activity report confidentiality, addressing how institutions may communicate with customers who may be the subject of a SAR.

Five major U.S. financial regulators—the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, OCC, and FinCEN—have issued a joint statement to clarify how financial institutions can communicate with customers regarding suspicious activity without violating the strict confidentiality requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. Federal law prohibits disclosing to any person involved in a transaction that a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) has been filed, a practice known as “tipping off.” This prohibition creates practical challenges for institutions when they need to terminate customer relationships or obtain information related to potentially illicit activity.

Read the full dispatch →
Bryan Cave Leighton PaisnerFinancial Regulation+ Expand
FCA Proposes Tying Financial Penalties to Net Worth

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority has proposed amending its penalty framework to explicitly consider an individual's total income or net assets to ensure credible deterrence.

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a consultation paper, CP26/19, proposing a significant change to how it calculates financial penalties for individuals in non-market abuse cases. The proposal would amend the regulator's policy to explicitly allow for penalty uplifts based on the size of an individual’s income or net assets, aiming to ensure "credible deterrence," particularly for wealthier individuals.

This shift could substantially increase financial exposure for senior managers and other high-net-worth individuals within regulated firms. Critics, such as law firm BCLP in its public response, argue the change could untether penalties from the specific nature and severity of the misconduct. This might lead to arbitrary and inconsistent outcomes, where fines are determined by an individual's overall wealth, including assets like inheritance that are unrelated to their regulated activities. Such an approach, critics contend, risks being perceived as more punitive than deterrent, especially when applied to negligence cases rather than deliberate misconduct. Counsel

Read the full dispatch →
Bryan Cave Leighton PaisnerSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
FCA Scraps Key IPO Rules to Bolster UK Capital Markets

The Financial Conduct Authority has eliminated the mandatory seven-day waiting period between prospectus and research publication and dropped equal information sharing rules for unconnected analysts to reduce costs and execution risk.

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has implemented significant deregulatory changes to the equity IPO process, effective August 5, 2026, via its Policy Statement PS26/16. The reforms remove two key requirements introduced in 2018: the mandatory seven-day gap between the publication of a prospectus and connected research, and the obligation to share the same information with unconnected analysts. The FCA concluded the prior regime failed to achieve its goals, as few unconnected analyst reports were published, while the rules added market risk and compliance costs, placing UK listings at a competitive disadvantage. The changes are expected to shorten the IPO timeline, reduce execution risk, and lower costs for issuers. Issuers and their advisers should immediately update internal IPO process documentation and precedent timetables. The FCA will consider further reforms, including a potential relaxation of guidance on pre-mandate issuer/analyst interactions.

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoieFinancial Regulation+ Expand
APRA, ASIC Urge Financial Firms to Act on Frontier AI Risks

Australia's top financial regulators have jointly warned the industry to move beyond awareness to implement and test practical, measurable resilience measures against emerging threats from frontier AI.

Following a series of nine industry roundtables, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly put the financial sector on notice regarding risks from frontier artificial intelligence. The regulators stated that industry awareness must now translate into practical action, testing, and measurable resilience outcomes. They expect regulated entities to demonstrate that their governance processes, key decision-making arrangements, and communication strategies are robust enough to operate at the speed required by emerging AI-driven threats.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsCorporate / M&A+ Expand
Delaware Court Allows 'Catch and Kill' Suit Against Strategic Investor

A recent Chancery Court decision warns that contractual veto rights do not shield a strategic investor or its board designee from liability for allegedly using those rights to destroy a company for competitive advantage.

In a recent opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery allowed a startup's lawsuit to proceed against a strategic investor and its board designee for an alleged “catch and kill” scheme. The startup, Zync Inc., claimed the investor used its contractually-granted board seat and veto rights to block essential financing and a $50 million acquisition, ultimately forcing Zync to shut down. The court denied the investor's motion to dismiss claims of fiduciary breach, aiding and abetting, and tortious interference.

Read the full dispatch →
DLA PiperFinancial Regulation+ Expand
Circuit Split Sets Up Showdown on Prediction Market Regulation

The Ninth Circuit has ruled that federal commodity law does not preempt state gaming regulations for sports-related prediction markets, creating a direct conflict with the Third Circuit.

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on August 28, 2026, that sports-event contracts on prediction markets are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), holding that federal law does not preempt state gambling regulations. The decision creates a direct circuit split with the Third Circuit, which had previously ruled in favor of federal preemption. The conflict injects significant legal and regulatory uncertainty into the rapidly growing prediction market industry, which saw trading volumes of $51 billion in 2025.

Sophisticated counsel and clients in the finance and gaming sectors care because operators like Kalshi and Polymarket now face a fractured regulatory landscape, potentially needing to comply with disparate state gaming laws in the Ninth Circuit while operating under a different, federally regulated regime elsewhere. This complicates business operations and increases compliance costs. The confirmed split makes the issue a strong candidate for Supreme Court review.

Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth ShawEmployment / Labor+ Expand
IRS Issues Proposed Rules for Employer 'Trump Account' Contributions

New IRS proposed regulations detail the requirements for employers to establish tax-advantaged contribution programs for 'Trump Accounts,' including plan documents, contribution limits, and nondiscrimination rules.

The U.S. Treasury and IRS have released proposed regulations clarifying how employers can contribute to new 'Trump Accounts,' a tax-advantaged savings vehicle for employees' dependents under Internal Revenue Code Section 128. The guidance provides the first concrete framework for employers considering offering this new benefit, addressing key operational questions such as the requirement for a formal written plan, a $2,500 annual per-employee contribution limit (indexed for inflation), and specific nondiscrimination tests modeled on those for dependent care flexible spending accounts. Notably, the rules clarify that employers cannot restrict contributions to a particular trustee and explicitly prohibit investing account funds in ESG-themed index funds. While the proposal answers many threshold questions, it leaves several administrative challenges unresolved, including procedures for contribution corrections and satisfying annual reporting obligations. Employers and their benefits counsel can now begin to evaluate the feasibility of such programs but will need to monitor for final re

Read the full dispatch →
Orrick, Herrington & SutcliffeEnergy / Renewables+ Expand
Trump EO Restricts Bulk-Power Equipment Imports, Targets China

President Trump signed EO 14421 directing the Secretary of Energy to ban imports of foreign-produced bulk-power equipment from China and other arms-embargoed countries, with implementing rules due by December 24, 2026.

President Trump issued Executive Order 14421 on August 26, 2026, invoking national security authority to restrict U.S. imports of bulk-power system electrical equipment from Covered Foreign Entities—countries subject to U.S. arms embargoes or sanctions under ITAR, currently including China and Russia. The order broadly covers equipment used in substations, control rooms, power generating systems, and associated software and firmware with remote-access capabilities, including transformers, inverters, battery energy storage systems, and industrial control systems.

No immediate private-party obligations arise; the Secretary of Energy must issue implementing regulations by December 24, 2026. Those regulations may prohibit acquisition, importation, transfer, or installation of covered equipment posing undue risk of sabotage, supply disruption, or catastrophic effects on critical infrastructure. Crucially, the Secretary may also impose conditions on already-installed equipment—requiring identification, isolation, monitoring, disconnection, replacement, or removal.

Read the full dispatch →
King & SpaldingSanctions / Export Controls+ Expand
US Expands Iran Sanctions to Target Third-Country Enablers

The Treasury and State Departments announced a significant escalation of the Iran sanctions program, targeting new economic sectors and threatening secondary sanctions against non-U.S. companies that facilitate Iranian trade.

On August 24, 2026, the U.S. government initiated "Operation Economic Outcast," a major escalation of its Iran sanctions program aimed at third-country enablers. The initiative imposes new sectoral sanctions on Iran's digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping industries. Concurrently, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) suspended five general licenses that had previously authorized certain educational, remittance, and cultural exchange activities. The action also includes nearly 90 new designations of entities, individuals, and vessels across several countries. For sophisticated counsel, this signals a "zero-leakage" enforcement posture with heightened secondary sanctions risk for non-U.S. companies, which are now on notice to sever ties with Iran. The accompanying FinCEN Section 311 action against a UAE bank demonstrates a broader use of regulatory tools to isolate Iran from the global financial system. Companies with any direct or indirect exposure to Iran should immediately review and update their compliance programs and screening protocols, as U.

Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth ShawPrivacy / Data Security+ Expand
CA Bill to Curb Website Tracking Suits Awaits Governor's Signature

Businesses facing a wave of class actions under the California Invasion of Privacy Act may soon see relief, as a new bill targeting website "pen register" claims has been sent to the governor.

California's legislature has passed SB 690, a bill that would curb a recent surge of litigation targeting common website tracking technologies. The bill, now awaiting the governor's signature, specifically eliminates the private right of action for claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act’s (CIPA) “pen register” and “trap and trace” provisions.

This is a critical development for businesses, as plaintiffs have been leveraging these wiretapping-era statutes to bring class actions over the use of routine tools like analytics pixels and cookies, seeking statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation without proving actual harm. If signed, the law would apply retroactively to many pending cases, offering immediate relief to defendants.

Read the full dispatch →
Proskauer RoseFinancial Regulation+ Expand
SEC Proposes Rescinding Pay-to-Play Rule for Advisers

The SEC has proposed to eliminate Rule 206(4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act, but counsel should note that other federal, state, and contractual restrictions on political contributions would remain in place.

The SEC has proposed the full rescission of Rule 206(4)-5 of the Investment Advisers Act, its "pay-to-play" rule. Adopted in 2010, the rule prohibits an investment adviser from receiving compensation for services to a government-entity client for two years if the adviser or its associates make a political contribution to an official in a position to influence the award of advisory business. The proposal acknowledges industry criticism that the rule's rigid, strict-liability framework has led to severe consequences for minor violations.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsEnvironment / ESG / Climate+ Expand
California Details First SB 253 Climate Reporting Rules

The California Air Resources Board has released new guidance and a voluntary reporting platform for inaugural greenhouse gas emissions reports due this fall under the state's landmark corporate climate disclosure law.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new guidance and launched a voluntary online platform for companies preparing their first greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reports under the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253). Although the final implementing regulation awaits approval, CARB is proceeding as if the inaugural reports for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are due November 10, 2026. Sophisticated counsel should note the significant enforcement discretion outlined in the guidance for this first reporting cycle. Companies that were not already collecting GHG data as of December 5, 2024, are not required to generate new data for this deadline; instead, they may submit a “statement of non-reporting.” The guidance also clarifies that third-party assurance, while ultimately required by the statute, will not be a prerequisite for accepted submissions in 2026. Covered entities should immediately evaluate the guidance to determine their specific obligations and prepare for the upcoming filing.

Read the full dispatch →
King & SpaldingWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
New DOJ Fraud Division Memo Signals Healthcare Enforcement Push

The Department of Justice’s new National Fraud Enforcement Division will prioritize data-driven prosecutions targeting telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, and other healthcare schemes.

The Department of Justice’s recently formed National Fraud Enforcement Division has identified healthcare fraud as a primary enforcement priority. According to a memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald, the division will deploy advanced data analytics to proactively detect and prosecute fraudulent schemes in high-risk areas. These include telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, controlled substance diversion, and deceptive marketing of healthcare services.

Read the full dispatch →
Akin GumpEnvironment / ESG / Climate+ Expand
California Releases Platform for 2026 Emissions Reporting

The California Air Resources Board has released a new voluntary reporting platform, guidance document, and video tutorial to assist companies with their initial Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions disclosures due November 10, 2026, under SB 253.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new resources to help companies prepare for the first emissions reporting deadline under the state's climate disclosure law, SB 253. With inaugural reports on 2026 Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due by November 10, 2026, CARB has launched a voluntary online reporting platform, a formal guidance document, and a video tutorial explaining the submission process. While use of the platform is optional—companies may also submit reports via a dedicated email address—these tools provide needed clarity on the mechanics of compliance. The release demonstrates CARB's intent to adhere to the current timeline, even as the underlying regulations await final approval from the state's Office of Administrative Law. Covered entities should now be finalizing their GHG inventories and confirming internal processes for the November submission. The new guidance provides a clear pathway for the inaugural filing, representing a key milestone in the implementation of California's ambitious corporate climate transparency regime.

Read the full dispatch →
VenableRegulatory / Government+ Expand
Michigan Ballot Measure Proposes Sweeping Pay-to-Play Rules

A Michigan ballot initiative expected in November would impose broad new political contribution restrictions on utilities, government contractors, and their many affiliates.

A Michigan ballot measure slated for the November election proposes one of the nation's most extensive "pay-to-play" laws, creating significant compliance risks for companies doing business in the state. The proposed law would bar political contributions from regulated electric and gas utilities as well as companies holding or seeking state or local government contracts over $250,000. Crucially, the restrictions extend far beyond the corporate entities themselves to cover their "principals"—a broadly defined group including directors, senior officers, 5% owners, lobbyists, and certain immediate family members. The rules would also apply to "affiliated entities," which could implicate corporate PACs and trade associations. The expansive scope means national corporations with Michigan operations will need to re-evaluate their political giving compliance programs and carefully track the personal contributions of a wide range of individuals. If passed, most provisions would take effect 10 days after the election is certified, requiring swift preparation.

Read the full dispatch →
BakerHostetlerWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
11th Cir. Upholds FCA Qui Tam Provision, Reversing District Court

Reversing a novel district court ruling, the panel held that private relators are not 'Officers of the United States' and their lawsuits do not violate the Appointments Clause.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed a district court decision that found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the panel held that private relators who sue on behalf of the government are not 'Officers of the United States' under Article II's Appointments Clause. The decision overturns a first-of-its-kind ruling from the Middle District of Florida and aligns the Eleventh Circuit with every other appellate court to have considered the issue. The ruling restores the status quo for FCA defendants and eliminates, for now, a potent defense in the Eleventh Circuit, a major venue for these cases. However, the constitutional fight is not over. The panel remanded the case for the district court to consider the defendant's other constitutional challenges based on the Take Care and Vesting Clauses. Counsel should also monitor a similar pending case in the Third Circuit. Despite the current unanimity among the circuits, recent comments from several Supreme Court justices sugg

Read the full dispatch →
Goodwin ProcterWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
DOJ Issues First Healthcare Declination Under New Corporate Enforcement Policy

The Department of Justice declined to prosecute a healthcare management company that self-disclosed fraud, while simultaneously indicting its former CEO for the scheme.

The Department of Justice has declined to prosecute Campus Eye Management Holdings under its new Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP), marking the first such declination for a healthcare company. The declination was granted after the company voluntarily disclosed misconduct, fully cooperated with investigators, and took remedial action, including agreeing to pay $1 million to affected patients. This resolution is a critical data point for corporate counsel and investors, as it demonstrates the tangible benefits of self-reporting under the new policy. However, it also powerfully illustrates the DOJ's focus on individual accountability. Concurrent with the corporate declination, the department unsealed a seven-count indictment against Campus Eye's founder and former CEO for allegedly orchestrating the $3.4 million Medicare billing fraud and kickback scheme. The case serves as a clear warning and a roadmap, signaling that while a company can earn leniency through cooperation, individuals responsible for the misconduct will be aggressively pursued. It highligh

Read the full dispatch →
Orrick, Herrington & SutcliffeEmployment / Labor+ Expand
UK Supreme Court Widens Part-Time Worker Discrimination Test

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that part-time workers only need to show their status was an 'effective cause' of less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason', significantly lowering the bar for discrimination claims.

The UK Supreme Court has allowed an appeal in Augustine v Data Cars Ltd, significantly altering the causation test for discrimination under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. Overturning a prior Court of Appeal decision, the court held that a claimant need only demonstrate that their part-time status was an 'effective cause' of the less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason.' The justices reasoned that the UK's implementing regulations deliberately used the phrase 'on the ground that,' which aligns with established domestic discrimination law, rather than adopting the narrower 'solely' language from the corresponding EU Framework Agreement.

This decision materially lowers the bar for part-time workers bringing discrimination claims and increases litigation risk for employers. Company policies, such as flat-rate fees for benefits or access to systems, that were previously defensible may now be vulnerable if they disproportionately disadvantage part-time employees. Any UK employer with a part-time workforce is affected.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsAntitrust / Competition+ Expand
FTC Deadlocks on IonQ/SkyWater Vertical Merger Remedy

A 1-1 split among FTC commissioners on whether to impose a behavioral remedy in IonQ's acquisition of SkyWater allowed the deal to close, providing a detailed roadmap of their divergent analytical approaches to vertical transactions.

The Federal Trade Commission closed its investigation into quantum-computer developer IonQ's acquisition of semiconductor foundry SkyWater after its two sitting commissioners deadlocked on a remedy. The split allowed the transaction to close without conditions.

Chairman Andrew Ferguson concluded that the deal's vertical-integration risks—primarily that IonQ could foreclose rivals' access to SkyWater's foundry or gain access to their sensitive data—warranted a behavioral consent order. In contrast, Commissioner Mark Meador found insufficient evidence that the deal might substantially lessen competition, citing low foreclosure shares and the presence of alternative suppliers.

Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth ShawImmigration+ Expand
DHS Proposes Eliminating 60-Day Grace Period for Nonimmigrant Workers

A proposed rule would remove a critical safe harbor for sponsored workers in E, H-1B, L-1, O-1, and TN status, potentially requiring them to leave the US immediately after a layoff.

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has advanced a proposal to eliminate the 60-day grace period for certain nonimmigrant workers following the end of their employment. The rule, which has cleared review by the Office of Management and Budget, would affect individuals in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN status.

Since 2017, this discretionary grace period has provided a critical buffer for sponsored employees to seek new employment, change their immigration status, or arrange for departure without immediately falling out of status. Its removal would mark a return to the pre-2017 framework, where job loss could result in the immediate loss of one's legal basis to remain in the country. The change would create significant challenges for employers managing reductions in force and add pressure to accelerate hiring and sponsorship for skilled workers seeking new roles.

Read the full dispatch →
SteptoeInternational Trade / Tariffs+ Expand
Forced Labor Bans Are New Anti-Corruption Frontier

Companies are increasingly required to apply anti-corruption compliance principles to supply-chain diligence to avoid costly import bans targeting forced labor.

Corporate compliance programs are now being urged to treat forced-labor prevention with the same rigor as anti-corruption efforts. This shift is driven by aggressive enforcement of laws like the US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which establishes a rebuttable presumption that goods from certain regions are made with forced labor and are therefore banned from importation. The guide explains that this reverses the burden of proof, requiring importers to affirmatively demonstrate that their supply chains are clean through extensive due diligence and traceability measures. For sophisticated counsel and clients, this transforms supply-chain ethics from a reputational concern into a critical legal and business continuity risk. Failure to adapt can lead to shipment seizures, significant financial loss, and severe brand damage. Companies should now be integrating forced-labor risk assessments directly into their existing compliance frameworks and mapping supply chains beyond direct suppliers to prepare for potential enforcement actions.

Read the full dispatch →
Hogan LovellsCorporate / M&A+ Expand
Mexico Proposes National Security Screening for Foreign Takeovers

A new bill would require government approval for foreign acquisitions over 49% in critical sectors, creating a CFIUS-like review process with significant potential for deal delays.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has submitted a bill to the Senate to establish a mandatory national security review for foreign acquisitions, similar to the CFIUS process in the United States. The proposed law would empower Mexico's National Foreign Investment Commission (CNIE) to screen deals where a foreign investor seeks to acquire more than 49% of a Mexican company that operates in a wide range of designated critical sectors and exceeds a yet-to-be-determined asset threshold.

This new regime could introduce significant uncertainty and delays into M&A transactions in Mexico. The list of covered industries is extensive, including energy, transportation, healthcare, and technology sectors like AI and semiconductors. A key point of concern is the review timeline: CNIE has 60 business days, extendable by 30, to issue a resolution. If no decision is issued within that period, the transaction is automatically deemed denied, heightening deal risk.

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoieSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
SEC, FDA Formalize Cooperation on Public Company Disclosures

The two agencies have established a new framework for sharing non-public information, signaling a potential uptick in SEC enforcement actions concerning clinical trial data, product approvals, and safety matters.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on August 31, 2026, to formalize and enhance cooperation and information sharing. The agreement establishes a direct channel for the agencies to exchange non-public information, increasing the likelihood that the SEC will scrutinize company disclosures against data submitted to the FDA.

For sophisticated counsel and their clients in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and medical device sectors, this signals a heightened risk of enforcement actions. Discrepancies between statements to investors and filings with the FDA regarding clinical trials, regulatory approval status, or product safety could become a primary source for SEC investigations. The agencies have created dedicated points of contact to streamline the process. FDA-regulated public companies should immediately review their disclosure controls and procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy across all regulatory and financial reporting. Counsel should monitor for an expected increase in SEC filing r

Read the full dispatch →
Haynes and BooneFinancial Regulation+ Expand
CFTC Proposes Rule to Codify CPO Registration Exemption

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed a rule to make a temporary registration exemption for certain fund managers permanent, but with key changes to investor eligibility and redemption requirements.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed a rule to codify existing no-action relief and reinstate a pre-2012 registration exemption for certain commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs). This move would convert a temporary, staff-level accommodation into a durable, rule-based compliance pathway for managers of private funds offered to qualified eligible persons (QEPs).

Sophisticated counsel should note that the proposal differs materially from the current no-action relief. Most notably, the proposed rule would require a CPO to offer all participants a right of redemption before it could deregister, a requirement absent from the current relief. The proposal also modifies investor eligibility, narrowing the definition for individual investors while broadening it for institutional investors to include certain categories of accredited investors. This creates a strategic dilemma for fund managers, who must weigh the certainty of a final rule against the more straightforward deregistration process available now.

Read the full dispatch →
DLA PiperFDA / Life Sciences Regulatory+ Expand
Report Details Misleading Ads for Unapproved Online Drugs

A new analysis finds online vendors often use misleading claims and omit key safety data when advertising non-FDA-approved compounded drugs, drawing increased FDA enforcement.

A study by DLA Piper highlights widespread misleading advertising and safety omissions by online pharmacies and telehealth platforms promoting non-FDA-approved compounded drugs. The analysis of 23 vendors found that 52% made unsupported efficacy claims and 43% had incomplete or misleading safety warnings, particularly for popular treatments in weight loss, erectile dysfunction, and hair loss.

This trend poses a significant risk for the pharmaceutical and telehealth industries, as consumers are often unable to distinguish between FDA-approved medicines and unvetted compounded formulations. The report notes that consumer trust is misplaced, with many believing online sellers are already approved by regulators. In response, the FDA has sharply increased enforcement, issuing over 100 warning letters since September 2025, primarily targeting providers of compounded GLP-1 drugs.

Read the full dispatch →
Ropes & GrayCybersecurity+ Expand
Asset Managers Face AI-Powered Phishing and Voice-Clone Attacks

Sophisticated attacks use generative AI to clone executive voices and bypass multi-factor authentication, raising regulatory scrutiny in the UK and EU.

Attackers are deploying increasingly sophisticated social engineering campaigns against hedge funds and other asset managers, leveraging generative AI to create convincing synthetic voice and video replicas of senior executives. The new wave of "vishing" (voice phishing) and spearphishing attacks uses meticulously researched pretexts from public investor communications and can bypass common multi-factor authentication (MFA) through methods like adversary-in-the-middle proxies.

Read the full dispatch →
DIG DEEPER
MOST CONSEQUENTIALSEC Proposes New Exemptions and Safe Harbor for Crypto Offerings

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed 'Regulation Crypto Assets,' a new framework creating tailored offering exemptions and a safe harbor for digital asset investment contracts.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a new framework intended to create a viable compliance path for cryptoasset offerings. The proposal, enjoying unified support from the commissioners, marks a significant shift from the prior administration's enforcement-led approach. It introduces two tailored offering exemptions: a "Startup Exemption" for raises up to $5 million and a tiered "Fundraising Exemption," modeled on Regulation A, for raises up to $75 million annually. It also establishes a safe harbor allowing an issuer to certify when its token is no longer part of an investment contract, addressing a core uncertainty under the Howey test.

Latham & WatkinsSecurities / Capital Markets
seccryptoregulation-crypto-assetssecuritiescapital-formationsafe-harboroffering-exemptions
AR
Today's Curator
Arthur Rodrigues. Corporate Counsel & Corporate Secretary at Teachable, Inc. Founder of Cicero Intelligent Minds. Former BigLaw (O'Melveny, Weil, Hughes Hubbard). JD/LLM Michigan Law.
Full Analysis — The Details
01 — ANTITRUST / COMPETITION1
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
FTC Deadlocks on IonQ/SkyWater Vertical Merger Remedy

A 1-1 split among FTC commissioners on whether to impose a behavioral remedy in IonQ's acquisition of SkyWater allowed the deal to close, providing a detailed roadmap of their divergent analytical approaches to vertical transactions.

The Federal Trade Commission closed its investigation into quantum-computer developer IonQ's acquisition of semiconductor foundry SkyWater after its two sitting commissioners deadlocked on a remedy. The split allowed the transaction to close without conditions.

Chairman Andrew Ferguson concluded that the deal's vertical-integration risks—primarily that IonQ could foreclose rivals' access to SkyWater's foundry or gain access to their sensitive data—warranted a behavioral consent order. In contrast, Commissioner Mark Meador found insufficient evidence that the deal might substantially lessen competition, citing low foreclosure shares and the presence of alternative suppliers.

ftcvertical-mergersmerger-reviewantitrustconsent-decreesemiconductorsnational-security
Read the full dispatch →
02 — CORPORATE / M&A4
Goodwin Procter+ Expand
Delaware Court Denies Safe Harbor in First Test of New DGCL 144

The Court of Chancery held for the first time that a board's "grossly negligent" process in managing a conflicted director can defeat the DGCL Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor, even with a disinterested majority vote.

In its first interpretation of amended Delaware General Corporation Law Section 144, the Court of Chancery in 'Dodiya v. Franklin' denied a motion to dismiss, holding that safe-harbor protection for a conflicted transaction was unavailable at the pleading stage. The court found it "reasonably conceivable" that the target's board acted with gross negligence by restoring a conflicted director's access to confidential sale-process information, despite knowing he had previously leaked material nonpublic data to his father, the ultimate acquirer. This decision establishes that the Section 144(a)(1) safe harbor requires not just a disinterested majority vote, but a process conducted "in good faith and without gross negligence." For corporate counsel and dealmakers, this ruling underscores that process controls are critical; merely walling off a conflicted director on paper is insufficient if not enforced. The court also found the stockholder-vote safe harbor under Section 144(a)(2) was unavailable because the proxy statement allegedly misrepresented the conflicted director's exclusion from

delaware-chancerycorporate-governancemergers-acquisitionsfiduciary-dutydgcl-section-144conflicts-of-interestsafe-harbor
Read the full dispatch →
Holland & Knight+ Expand
Delaware Court Finds Acquiror Fraud in $120M Earnout Dispute

A recent Court of Chancery decision applying the Fortis precedent shows the high cost of extracontractual misrepresentations by a buyer during M&A negotiations, absent a bilateral anti-reliance clause.

The Delaware Court of Chancery awarded a $120 million post-trial verdict against a private equity acquiror for fraud in an earnout dispute, finding the buyer knowingly misrepresented the existing payment volume on its platform—a key metric for the seller's earnout potential. The court found dispositive evidence in the acquiror's own internal emails, where the deal team acknowledged the figures shared with the seller were a "red herring."

mergers-acquisitionsdelaware-chanceryearnoutfraudanti-reliance-clauseprivate-equity
Read the full dispatch →
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
Delaware Court Allows 'Catch and Kill' Suit Against Strategic Investor

A recent Chancery Court decision warns that contractual veto rights do not shield a strategic investor or its board designee from liability for allegedly using those rights to destroy a company for competitive advantage.

In a recent opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery allowed a startup's lawsuit to proceed against a strategic investor and its board designee for an alleged “catch and kill” scheme. The startup, Zync Inc., claimed the investor used its contractually-granted board seat and veto rights to block essential financing and a $50 million acquisition, ultimately forcing Zync to shut down. The court denied the investor's motion to dismiss claims of fiduciary breach, aiding and abetting, and tortious interference.

delaware-chancerycorporate-governancefiduciary-dutyventure-capitalinvestor-rightscatch-and-killzync-v-porsche
Read the full dispatch →
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
Mexico Proposes National Security Screening for Foreign Takeovers

A new bill would require government approval for foreign acquisitions over 49% in critical sectors, creating a CFIUS-like review process with significant potential for deal delays.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has submitted a bill to the Senate to establish a mandatory national security review for foreign acquisitions, similar to the CFIUS process in the United States. The proposed law would empower Mexico's National Foreign Investment Commission (CNIE) to screen deals where a foreign investor seeks to acquire more than 49% of a Mexican company that operates in a wide range of designated critical sectors and exceeds a yet-to-be-determined asset threshold.

This new regime could introduce significant uncertainty and delays into M&A transactions in Mexico. The list of covered industries is extensive, including energy, transportation, healthcare, and technology sectors like AI and semiconductors. A key point of concern is the review timeline: CNIE has 60 business days, extendable by 30, to issue a resolution. If no decision is issued within that period, the transaction is automatically deemed denied, heightening deal risk.

mexicoforeign-investmentnational-securitymacniecross-border-transactions
Read the full dispatch →
03 — CYBERSECURITY1
Ropes & Gray+ Expand
Asset Managers Face AI-Powered Phishing and Voice-Clone Attacks

Sophisticated attacks use generative AI to clone executive voices and bypass multi-factor authentication, raising regulatory scrutiny in the UK and EU.

Attackers are deploying increasingly sophisticated social engineering campaigns against hedge funds and other asset managers, leveraging generative AI to create convincing synthetic voice and video replicas of senior executives. The new wave of "vishing" (voice phishing) and spearphishing attacks uses meticulously researched pretexts from public investor communications and can bypass common multi-factor authentication (MFA) through methods like adversary-in-the-middle proxies.

cybersecurityasset-managementphishingaifinancial-regulationfcadoravishing
Read the full dispatch →
04 — EMPLOYMENT / LABOR5
Polsinelli+ Expand
OFCCP Ends Contractor Disability Self-ID, 7% Goal

A new final rule effective Sept. 21, 2026, removes the long-standing requirement for federal contractors to use Form CC-305 and conduct a 7% utilization analysis, though core nondiscrimination obligations remain.

The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued a final rule that removes long-standing disability affirmative action requirements for federal contractors. Effective September 21, 2026, the rule eliminates the 7% disability utilization goal, the associated annual utilization analysis, and the mandatory use of Form CC-305 for inviting applicants and employees to self-identify as having a disability.

This change overhauls a compliance framework that has been in place for more than a decade, easing certain specific data-collection and analytical burdens. However, the rule does not alter contractors' core nondiscrimination duties under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act. Contractors must still take affirmative action to employ and advance qualified individuals with disabilities and maintain written affirmative action programs where required.

ofccpfederal-contractorsaffirmative-actiondisability-discriminationemployment-lawsection-503
Read the full dispatch →
McDermott Will & Emery+ Expand
DOL Proposes E-Delivery Safe Harbor for Health Plans

A proposed notice-and-access framework for ERISA group health plan disclosures would expand electronic delivery options but create a third set of rules alongside those for retirement and other welfare plans.

The US Department of Labor has proposed a new optional safe harbor to allow electronic delivery of ERISA-required group health plan disclosures. The rule, proposed July 23, 2026, would establish a “notice-and-access” framework similar to that available for retirement plans, permitting administrators to post documents online and send a notice of internet availability. This could significantly reduce administrative burdens and costs for employers, especially for reaching employees without regular work-related computer access, retirees, and other beneficiaries who provide an electronic address.

erisadolemployee-benefitsgroup-health-planselectronic-disclosuresafe-harbor
Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth Shaw+ Expand
EEOC adopts FY 2026–2030 strategic plan: enforcement tempo, systemic focus

The final plan formalizes a 97% targeted-relief target, 90% litigation-win floor, and resource concentration on ten-plus-employee systemic cases through 2030.

The EEOC has formally adopted its Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2026–2030, the institutional counterpart to its National Enforcement Plan and the metric framework that will govern agency operations for the next five years. Three strategic goals drive the plan: strategic law enforcement, outreach and training, and organizational excellence, supported by seventeen performance measures with hard numerical targets. Key measures employers should track include a 97% rate for non-monetary targeted equitable relief in conciliation and litigation outcomes, a 90% favorable resolution rate in enforcement suits, and a refocused Systemic Program keyed to matters involving ten or more aggrieved individuals, with explicit retention of Commissioner Charges and directed investigations as tools. The plan also commits the agency to enhanced conciliation monitoring, faster intake processing (10% reduction by FY 2030), a 95% staffing target, and quarterly stakeholder satisfaction tracking, signaling a more disciplined and accountable EEOC. Coupled with the approximately 28% rise in annual private-secto

eeocstrategic-planfy-2026-2030systemic-investigationsconciliationnational-enforcement-planai-hiringworkplace-compliance
Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth Shaw+ Expand
IRS Issues Proposed Rules for Employer 'Trump Account' Contributions

New IRS proposed regulations detail the requirements for employers to establish tax-advantaged contribution programs for 'Trump Accounts,' including plan documents, contribution limits, and nondiscrimination rules.

The U.S. Treasury and IRS have released proposed regulations clarifying how employers can contribute to new 'Trump Accounts,' a tax-advantaged savings vehicle for employees' dependents under Internal Revenue Code Section 128. The guidance provides the first concrete framework for employers considering offering this new benefit, addressing key operational questions such as the requirement for a formal written plan, a $2,500 annual per-employee contribution limit (indexed for inflation), and specific nondiscrimination tests modeled on those for dependent care flexible spending accounts. Notably, the rules clarify that employers cannot restrict contributions to a particular trustee and explicitly prohibit investing account funds in ESG-themed index funds. While the proposal answers many threshold questions, it leaves several administrative challenges unresolved, including procedures for contribution corrections and satisfying annual reporting obligations. Employers and their benefits counsel can now begin to evaluate the feasibility of such programs but will need to monitor for final re

employee-benefitsirstaxerisaproposed-ruletreasury-department
Read the full dispatch →
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe+ Expand
UK Supreme Court Widens Part-Time Worker Discrimination Test

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that part-time workers only need to show their status was an 'effective cause' of less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason', significantly lowering the bar for discrimination claims.

The UK Supreme Court has allowed an appeal in Augustine v Data Cars Ltd, significantly altering the causation test for discrimination under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. Overturning a prior Court of Appeal decision, the court held that a claimant need only demonstrate that their part-time status was an 'effective cause' of the less favourable treatment, not the 'sole reason.' The justices reasoned that the UK's implementing regulations deliberately used the phrase 'on the ground that,' which aligns with established domestic discrimination law, rather than adopting the narrower 'solely' language from the corresponding EU Framework Agreement.

This decision materially lowers the bar for part-time workers bringing discrimination claims and increases litigation risk for employers. Company policies, such as flat-rate fees for benefits or access to systems, that were previously defensible may now be vulnerable if they disproportionately disadvantage part-time employees. Any UK employer with a part-time workforce is affected.

uk-employment-lawpart-time-workersdiscriminationsupreme-courtcausationaugustine-v-data-cars
Read the full dispatch →
05 — ENERGY / RENEWABLES2
Davis Wright Tremaine+ Expand
Washington Launches WETA to Tackle Transmission Bottlenecks

Washington's new Electric Transmission Authority will coordinate siting, financing, and eminent domain for high-priority corridors to move eastern renewables west of the Cascades.

Governor Inslee signed SB 6355 in March, creating the Washington Electric Transmission Authority (WETA), which took effect in June. WETA is an independent body with a 10-member gubernatorial board to be seated by January 1, 2027, and an executive director to be hired by June 30, 2027. Its remit is to coordinate transmission planning across utilities, BPA, tribes, and developers in corridors identified by the Department of Commerce, with powers to support permitting, partner with developers, own facilities on a transitional basis, and—critically—exercise eminent domain under RCW 8.04 to clear right-of-way disputes that have stalled projects. The authority is not a financing entity; it routes capital needs to the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority. Counsel should watch three near-term developments: the December 1, 2026 tribal consultation framework report, the January 2027 legislative session that may address SEPA exclusions for reconductoring and essential public facility designation, and the Department of Commerce's high-priority corridor designation process, all of wh

washington-transmissionwetasb-6355eminent-domaininterconnectionrenewablesbpaclean-energy-grid
Read the full dispatch →
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe+ Expand
Trump EO Restricts Bulk-Power Equipment Imports, Targets China

President Trump signed EO 14421 directing the Secretary of Energy to ban imports of foreign-produced bulk-power equipment from China and other arms-embargoed countries, with implementing rules due by December 24, 2026.

President Trump issued Executive Order 14421 on August 26, 2026, invoking national security authority to restrict U.S. imports of bulk-power system electrical equipment from Covered Foreign Entities—countries subject to U.S. arms embargoes or sanctions under ITAR, currently including China and Russia. The order broadly covers equipment used in substations, control rooms, power generating systems, and associated software and firmware with remote-access capabilities, including transformers, inverters, battery energy storage systems, and industrial control systems.

No immediate private-party obligations arise; the Secretary of Energy must issue implementing regulations by December 24, 2026. Those regulations may prohibit acquisition, importation, transfer, or installation of covered equipment posing undue risk of sabotage, supply disruption, or catastrophic effects on critical infrastructure. Crucially, the Secretary may also impose conditions on already-installed equipment—requiring identification, isolation, monitoring, disconnection, replacement, or removal.

executive-order-14421bulk-power-systemenergy-equipment-import-banchina-supply-chaindoe-regulationspower-grid-security
Read the full dispatch →
06 — ENVIRONMENT / ESG / CLIMATE4
DLA Piper+ Expand
US Challenges EU's ESG Rules, Citing Burdens on Commerce

In a formal letter to the EU, the US government warned it will take "any actions necessary" to shield US businesses from the extraterritorial impact and reporting burdens of the CSDDD and CSRD.

The US government has formally challenged the European Union's ambitious sustainability regulations, arguing they create unreasonable burdens for American commerce. In a letter to the EU, the US Mission stated that the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) have an adverse extraterritorial impact on US businesses. The US objects to the directives' "double materiality" standard and extensive supply-chain diligence obligations, which it claims will harm the competitiveness of US firms, even those with minimal EU market links. The letter warns that the US will take "any actions necessary" to address these concerns. This executive branch action is mirrored by a legislative proposal, the Stop EU Overreach Act, which would require the US Trade Representative to investigate the EU rules as a potentially unfair trade practice. Counsel for multinational clients should monitor the EU's response and the potential for an escalating trade dispute while continuing to prepare for the directives' complex compliance regimes.

csdddcsrdesgsustainability-reportinginternational-tradesupply-chainus-eu
Read the full dispatch →
Perkins Coie+ Expand
Australia Releases Voluntary Climate Transition Plan Guide

The Australian government published voluntary guidance for corporate climate transition planning, establishing a national good-practice standard aligned with international frameworks.

The Australian government has published its anticipated voluntary guidance on climate-related transition planning. Released on August 24, 2026, the framework is designed to help organizations develop strategies for the net-zero transition and adapt to the physical impacts of climate change. The guidance sets out a four-stage planning cycle and a three-tier proportionality framework, allowing companies to tailor their approach based on their climate risk exposure and complexity.

australiaclimate-changecorporate-governanceesgregulatory-guidancesustainabilitysustainable-financetransition-planning
Read the full dispatch →
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
California Details First SB 253 Climate Reporting Rules

The California Air Resources Board has released new guidance and a voluntary reporting platform for inaugural greenhouse gas emissions reports due this fall under the state's landmark corporate climate disclosure law.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new guidance and launched a voluntary online platform for companies preparing their first greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reports under the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253). Although the final implementing regulation awaits approval, CARB is proceeding as if the inaugural reports for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are due November 10, 2026. Sophisticated counsel should note the significant enforcement discretion outlined in the guidance for this first reporting cycle. Companies that were not already collecting GHG data as of December 5, 2024, are not required to generate new data for this deadline; instead, they may submit a “statement of non-reporting.” The guidance also clarifies that third-party assurance, while ultimately required by the statute, will not be a prerequisite for accepted submissions in 2026. Covered entities should immediately evaluate the guidance to determine their specific obligations and prepare for the upcoming filing.

sb-253carbclimate-disclosureesggreenhouse-gascalifornia
Read the full dispatch →
Akin Gump+ Expand
California Releases Platform for 2026 Emissions Reporting

The California Air Resources Board has released a new voluntary reporting platform, guidance document, and video tutorial to assist companies with their initial Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions disclosures due November 10, 2026, under SB 253.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued new resources to help companies prepare for the first emissions reporting deadline under the state's climate disclosure law, SB 253. With inaugural reports on 2026 Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due by November 10, 2026, CARB has launched a voluntary online reporting platform, a formal guidance document, and a video tutorial explaining the submission process. While use of the platform is optional—companies may also submit reports via a dedicated email address—these tools provide needed clarity on the mechanics of compliance. The release demonstrates CARB's intent to adhere to the current timeline, even as the underlying regulations await final approval from the state's Office of Administrative Law. Covered entities should now be finalizing their GHG inventories and confirming internal processes for the November submission. The new guidance provides a clear pathway for the inaugural filing, representing a key milestone in the implementation of California's ambitious corporate climate transparency regime.

carbsb-253climate-disclosureghg-emissionsesg-reportingcalifornia
Read the full dispatch →
07 — FDA / LIFE SCIENCES REGULATORY2
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr+ Expand
SEC, FDA Ink Deal to Share Non-Public Company Data

A new memorandum of understanding gives the SEC a formal channel to obtain confidential FDA records, increasing scrutiny of public disclosures by life sciences companies.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration have established a formal framework for sharing non-public information. An August 31, 2026, memorandum of understanding (MOU) gives the SEC’s divisions of Enforcement and Corporation Finance a direct channel to request and receive confidential records from the FDA concerning regulated public companies. For life sciences and other FDA-regulated issuers, this significantly raises the stakes for public communications. The SEC can now more easily cross-reference a company's investor-facing statements—regarding clinical trial results, product approval timelines, or the substance of agency meetings—against the FDA's own internal records. The MOU is part of a broader FDA transparency initiative, which includes the recent practice of publishing Complete Response Letters. The agreement heightens the risk of SEC scrutiny and potential enforcement action for disclosures that are perceived as incomplete, inconsistent, or more favorable than the underlying regulatory communications warrant. Companies must ensure all

secfdamouinformation-sharinglife-sciencesdisclosure-obligationsenforcement-risk
Read the full dispatch →
DLA Piper+ Expand
Report Details Misleading Ads for Unapproved Online Drugs

A new analysis finds online vendors often use misleading claims and omit key safety data when advertising non-FDA-approved compounded drugs, drawing increased FDA enforcement.

A study by DLA Piper highlights widespread misleading advertising and safety omissions by online pharmacies and telehealth platforms promoting non-FDA-approved compounded drugs. The analysis of 23 vendors found that 52% made unsupported efficacy claims and 43% had incomplete or misleading safety warnings, particularly for popular treatments in weight loss, erectile dysfunction, and hair loss.

This trend poses a significant risk for the pharmaceutical and telehealth industries, as consumers are often unable to distinguish between FDA-approved medicines and unvetted compounded formulations. The report notes that consumer trust is misplaced, with many believing online sellers are already approved by regulators. In response, the FDA has sharply increased enforcement, issuing over 100 warning letters since September 2025, primarily targeting providers of compounded GLP-1 drugs.

fdacompounded-drugsadvertisingtelehealthpharmaceuticalsenforcementglp-1
Read the full dispatch →
08 — FINANCIAL REGULATION11
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe+ Expand
FinCEN Ends Beneficial Ownership Reporting for US Companies

The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has issued a final rule permanently ending Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership reporting obligations for all U.S. companies and persons.

The U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a final rule that permanently exempts all U.S. companies and persons from the beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The rule, effective August 14, 2026, makes permanent the exemptions introduced in a March 2025 interim rule. This action represents a monumental reversal of a major compliance regime that was expected to affect over 32 million U.S. entities. Following a series of constitutional challenges and injunctions against the CTA, FinCEN has now narrowed the reporting obligation to only foreign companies registered to do business in the United States. The agency estimates only 28,000 entities will now be required to report. Furthermore, FinCEN announced it will delete all BOI previously reported by U.S. persons from its database. While this relieves domestic companies of a significant burden, foreign entities operating in the U.S. must still evaluate their reporting obligations for non-U.S. beneficial owners.

corporate-transparency-actfincenbeneficial-ownershipboi-reportingaml-cftregulatory-reform
Read the full dispatch →
Husch Blackwell+ Expand
CFTC to Act on Crypto Regulation if Congress Stalls

CFTC Chairman Michael Selig directed staff to develop a crypto-asset market structure under existing authority, creating a parallel regulatory track should the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act fail to pass the Senate.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael Selig has formally directed agency staff to begin drafting rules for a crypto-asset market structure under the CFTC’s existing statutory authority. The announcement, made during an Innovation Advisory Committee meeting, signals a significant strategic shift, establishing an administrative path for regulation that can proceed independently if the proposed Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act does not pass in the Senate.

cftccryptocurrencydigital-assetsfinancial-regulationrulemakingclarity-act
Read the full dispatch →
Perkins Coie+ Expand
FinCEN Final Rule Permanently Exempts Domestic Entities from CTA

FinCEN's August 2026 final rule permanently removes domestic entities and U.S. persons from CTA reporting while significantly narrowing foreign company obligations.

FinCEN's August 14, 2026 final rule marks a fundamental restructuring of the Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership reporting regime. Domestic entities created under U.S. state or tribal law are permanently removed from the definition of "reporting company," eliminating both initial filing requirements and ongoing update obligations. U.S. persons are similarly exempt from beneficial owner or company applicant status, meaning foreign reporting companies need not collect their personal identifying information. Notably, FinCEN will conduct a targeted purge of previously submitted domestic company and U.S. person data from its Beneficial Ownership IT System.

corporate-transparency-actboi-reportingfincen-final-ruledomestic-entity-exemptionforeign-reporting-companiesbeneficial-ownershipcdd-obligations
Read the full dispatch →
Proskauer Rose+ Expand
9th Cir. Ruling on Sports-Prediction Contracts Creates Circuit Split

The Ninth Circuit held that sports-related event contracts are not federally regulated swaps, clearing the way for state gaming laws and directly conflicting with a recent Third Circuit decision.

The Ninth Circuit ruled in KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad that sports event prediction contracts are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), exposing them to state-level gaming regulation. The decision allows Nevada to apply its gaming laws to operator Kalshi and rejects the argument that the products fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which had supported Kalshi as an amicus.

This ruling matters because it creates a direct conflict with an April 2026 Third Circuit decision that found such contracts were indeed federally regulated swaps preempting state law. The split introduces significant legal uncertainty for the fast-growing prediction-market industry, which now faces a fractured regulatory landscape. For clients in this sector, the key question is whether they will be governed by a single federal regulator or a complex patchwork of state gaming laws.

circuit-splitninth-circuitsports-bettingprediction-marketscftcfinancial-regulationpreemptionswaps
Read the full dispatch →
K&L Gates+ Expand
UK Replaces PRIIPs/UCITS Disclosures With New CCI Regime

Effective April 2026, a new UK framework for consumer composite investments requires manufacturers and distributors, including non-UK firms, to replace familiar KIIDs with a new CCI Product Summary by June 2027.

The UK has implemented a significant new disclosure framework for consumer composite investments (CCIs), replacing the familiar PRIIPs and UCITS key information documents (KIDs). Effective April 6, 2026, with a transition period until June 7, 2027, the rules require firms marketing products like funds, structured products, and derivatives to UK retail investors to adopt a new 'CCI Product Summary.' Sophisticated counsel must note the regime's broad extraterritorial reach, which applies to non-UK manufacturers and distributors, bringing many previously unregulated entities under the Financial Conduct Authority's direct supervision for these activities. The new framework also mandates that manufacturers provide machine-readable 'Core Information Disclosure' to distributors. While the format for the new Product Summary is less prescriptive than the old KIDs, it includes specific methodologies for calculating and presenting risk, return, and cost information. Firms must now identify all in-scope products, develop new disclosure templates, and ensure their data processes can meet the upda

financial-regulationuk-fcaasset-managementinvestment-fundspriipsucitsdisclosure
Read the full dispatch →
Paul Hastings+ Expand
Five US Regulators Clarify SAR Customer Communication Rules

Five key U.S. financial regulators have issued a joint statement clarifying the rules on suspicious activity report confidentiality, addressing how institutions may communicate with customers who may be the subject of a SAR.

Five major U.S. financial regulators—the Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, OCC, and FinCEN—have issued a joint statement to clarify how financial institutions can communicate with customers regarding suspicious activity without violating the strict confidentiality requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. Federal law prohibits disclosing to any person involved in a transaction that a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) has been filed, a practice known as “tipping off.” This prohibition creates practical challenges for institutions when they need to terminate customer relationships or obtain information related to potentially illicit activity.

financial-regulationsuspicious-activity-reportsaraml-compliancefincenbank-secrecy-act
Read the full dispatch →
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner+ Expand
FCA Proposes Tying Financial Penalties to Net Worth

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority has proposed amending its penalty framework to explicitly consider an individual's total income or net assets to ensure credible deterrence.

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a consultation paper, CP26/19, proposing a significant change to how it calculates financial penalties for individuals in non-market abuse cases. The proposal would amend the regulator's policy to explicitly allow for penalty uplifts based on the size of an individual’s income or net assets, aiming to ensure "credible deterrence," particularly for wealthier individuals.

This shift could substantially increase financial exposure for senior managers and other high-net-worth individuals within regulated firms. Critics, such as law firm BCLP in its public response, argue the change could untether penalties from the specific nature and severity of the misconduct. This might lead to arbitrary and inconsistent outcomes, where fines are determined by an individual's overall wealth, including assets like inheritance that are unrelated to their regulated activities. Such an approach, critics contend, risks being perceived as more punitive than deterrent, especially when applied to negligence cases rather than deliberate misconduct. Counsel

fcafinancial-conduct-authoritypenaltiesenforcementfinancial-regulationukindividual-liability
Read the full dispatch →
Perkins Coie+ Expand
APRA, ASIC Urge Financial Firms to Act on Frontier AI Risks

Australia's top financial regulators have jointly warned the industry to move beyond awareness to implement and test practical, measurable resilience measures against emerging threats from frontier AI.

Following a series of nine industry roundtables, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly put the financial sector on notice regarding risks from frontier artificial intelligence. The regulators stated that industry awareness must now translate into practical action, testing, and measurable resilience outcomes. They expect regulated entities to demonstrate that their governance processes, key decision-making arrangements, and communication strategies are robust enough to operate at the speed required by emerging AI-driven threats.

financial-regulationaustraliaartificial-intelligenceapraasiccybersecurityrisk-managementoperational-resilience
Read the full dispatch →
DLA Piper+ Expand
Circuit Split Sets Up Showdown on Prediction Market Regulation

The Ninth Circuit has ruled that federal commodity law does not preempt state gaming regulations for sports-related prediction markets, creating a direct conflict with the Third Circuit.

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on August 28, 2026, that sports-event contracts on prediction markets are not "swaps" under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), holding that federal law does not preempt state gambling regulations. The decision creates a direct circuit split with the Third Circuit, which had previously ruled in favor of federal preemption. The conflict injects significant legal and regulatory uncertainty into the rapidly growing prediction market industry, which saw trading volumes of $51 billion in 2025.

Sophisticated counsel and clients in the finance and gaming sectors care because operators like Kalshi and Polymarket now face a fractured regulatory landscape, potentially needing to comply with disparate state gaming laws in the Ninth Circuit while operating under a different, federally regulated regime elsewhere. This complicates business operations and increases compliance costs. The confirmed split makes the issue a strong candidate for Supreme Court review.

prediction-marketssports-bettingcftcpreemptioncircuit-splitfinancial-regulationgaming
Read the full dispatch →
Proskauer Rose+ Expand
SEC Proposes Rescinding Pay-to-Play Rule for Advisers

The SEC has proposed to eliminate Rule 206(4)-5 under the Investment Advisers Act, but counsel should note that other federal, state, and contractual restrictions on political contributions would remain in place.

The SEC has proposed the full rescission of Rule 206(4)-5 of the Investment Advisers Act, its "pay-to-play" rule. Adopted in 2010, the rule prohibits an investment adviser from receiving compensation for services to a government-entity client for two years if the adviser or its associates make a political contribution to an official in a position to influence the award of advisory business. The proposal acknowledges industry criticism that the rule's rigid, strict-liability framework has led to severe consequences for minor violations.

secinvestment-advisers-actpay-to-playfinancial-regulationrulemakingpolitical-contributionspublic-pension-funds
Read the full dispatch →
Haynes and Boone+ Expand
CFTC Proposes Rule to Codify CPO Registration Exemption

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed a rule to make a temporary registration exemption for certain fund managers permanent, but with key changes to investor eligibility and redemption requirements.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed a rule to codify existing no-action relief and reinstate a pre-2012 registration exemption for certain commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs). This move would convert a temporary, staff-level accommodation into a durable, rule-based compliance pathway for managers of private funds offered to qualified eligible persons (QEPs).

Sophisticated counsel should note that the proposal differs materially from the current no-action relief. Most notably, the proposed rule would require a CPO to offer all participants a right of redemption before it could deregister, a requirement absent from the current relief. The proposal also modifies investor eligibility, narrowing the definition for individual investors while broadening it for institutional investors to include certain categories of accredited investors. This creates a strategic dilemma for fund managers, who must weigh the certainty of a final rule against the more straightforward deregistration process available now.

cftcprivate-fundscommodity-pool-operatorqepno-action-letterfinancial-regulation
Read the full dispatch →
09 — FINTECH / CRYPTO1
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
US Treasury Proposes Rules for Stablecoin Issuance Under GENIUS Act

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking offers the first detailed look at how regulators will define who must obtain a federal license to issue or sell payment stablecoins in the United States.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued a long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. Enacted in July 2025, the Act creates a comprehensive federal licensing and supervisory framework for payment stablecoins. This NPRM proposes definitions for crucial jurisdictional terms, including what it means to “issue a payment stablecoin in the United States” and to “offer or sell” one to a person in the U.S. These definitions are fundamental for the digital asset industry, as they will determine which issuers must obtain a federal license starting in January 2027 and which stablecoins digital asset service providers can lawfully offer to U.S. customers. The rules will significantly impact both domestic and foreign-based issuers and exchanges seeking access to the American market. The Treasury has opened a 60-day public comment period, and market participants are expected to weigh in heavily on the proposal, which will shape the future of the U.S. stablecoin landscape.

stablecoinsgenius-actdigital-assetsus-treasuryrulemakingfinancial-regulationcrypto
Read the full dispatch →
10 — IMMIGRATION1
Seyfarth Shaw+ Expand
DHS Proposes Eliminating 60-Day Grace Period for Nonimmigrant Workers

A proposed rule would remove a critical safe harbor for sponsored workers in E, H-1B, L-1, O-1, and TN status, potentially requiring them to leave the US immediately after a layoff.

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has advanced a proposal to eliminate the 60-day grace period for certain nonimmigrant workers following the end of their employment. The rule, which has cleared review by the Office of Management and Budget, would affect individuals in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1, and TN status.

Since 2017, this discretionary grace period has provided a critical buffer for sponsored employees to seek new employment, change their immigration status, or arrange for departure without immediately falling out of status. Its removal would mark a return to the pre-2017 framework, where job loss could result in the immediate loss of one's legal basis to remain in the country. The change would create significant challenges for employers managing reductions in force and add pressure to accelerate hiring and sponsorship for skilled workers seeking new roles.

immigrationdhsuscish-1bl-1nonimmigrant-visasgrace-periodproposed-rule
Read the full dispatch →
11 — INTERNATIONAL TRADE / TARIFFS5
Morrison & Foerster+ Expand
FCC Adds Foreign-Made Advanced Robotics to 'Covered List'

The Federal Communications Commission has effectively barred new models of foreign-produced advanced robotic devices from the U.S. market, citing national security risks.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on July 28, 2026, added foreign-produced "advanced robotic devices" to its Covered List, a roster of equipment deemed to pose an unacceptable national security risk. Under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, listed equipment cannot receive FCC authorization, effectively barring new or modified models from being imported or sold in the U.S. The action, widely seen as targeting Chinese technology, follows similar prohibitions on drones, routers, and power inverters.

fcccovered-listinternational-traderoboticsnational-securitysupply-chainimport-restrictions
Read the full dispatch →
White & Case+ Expand
Mexico Proposes CFIUS-Style National Security Review for Foreign Investment

A new presidential bill would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing authorization regime for foreign acquisitions of over 49% in designated sensitive sectors.

Mexico's executive branch has introduced a bill to establish a formal national security screening process for foreign direct investment (FDI), modeled on the CFIUS regime in the United States. If enacted, the law would create a mandatory, suspensory pre-closing filing for foreign acquisitions of more than 49% equity in Mexican companies operating in broadly defined "sensitive sectors" including critical technology, energy, and strategic infrastructure.

mexicofdicfiusnational-securitycross-border-maforeign-investment
Read the full dispatch →
Holland & Knight+ Expand
FMC Eyes IMO Net-Zero Framework as Possible Shipping-Act Investigation Target

FMC Chair DiBella signaled the Commission could use its Section 19 authority to probe the IMO's proposed maritime GHG levy, opening a new trade-policy front.

The IMO's proposed Net-Zero Framework would set mandatory GHG limits and emissions pricing across international shipping, with Tier 1 penalties of $100 and Tier 2 penalties of $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent for non-compliant fleets. FMC Chairman DiBella has publicly questioned whether the resulting costs on U.S. cargo would be inflationary and whether the regime would displace existing systems like the EU ETS. She has gone further, suggesting the framework could itself become the subject of an FMC investigation. Under 46 U.S.C. §§ 42101-42109 and 46 C.F.R. Part 550, the FMC can probe foreign laws, regulations, or carrier practices that create conditions unfavorable to U.S. foreign commerce, with remedies ranging from fee equalization and sailing limits to per-voyage penalties up to $1 million and, in extreme cases, requests to deny port entry. Sophisticated shippers, carriers, and counsel should reassess tariff surcharges, service-contract allocation clauses, and exposure to retaliation against flag states, while tracking the IMO's London session, the November intersessional, and t

imo-net-zerofmc-section-19shipping-actosra-2022maritime-carbon-levyfmc-investigationeu-etsdibella
Read the full dispatch →
Cooley+ Expand
White House launches AI-driven crackdown on trade fraud transshipment

DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division names global trade and customs evasion a top priority alongside an AI-enabled CBP enforcement platform targeting China-linked transshipment.

On August 13, 2026, the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released 'The Great Transshipment Scam,' estimating $10 billion to $100+ billion in annual tariff revenue losses from goods routed through Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Mexico, and Cambodia to evade Section 301 tariffs. The same day, DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a memorandum identifying global trade and commerce as a primary enforcement focus, covering illicit transshipment, country-of-origin fraud, undervaluation, sanctions evasion, and foreign forced labor schemes. CBP is building an AI 'detective border' that fuses anomaly detection, link analysis, capacity validation, and physical-to-digital verification to flag suspicious routing, bills of lading, origin claims, and container imaging. NFED plans to reach roughly 500 attorneys and staff by late August and continue expanding for two years, deploying sophisticated data analytics. The memo signals that civil customs exposure can escalate to criminal prosecution, with potential coordination across CBP, DOJ, and Commerce. Sophisticated coun

transshipmentsection-301cbpdojnfedai-enforcementtariff-evasionchina-supply-chain
Read the full dispatch →
Steptoe+ Expand
Forced Labor Bans Are New Anti-Corruption Frontier

Companies are increasingly required to apply anti-corruption compliance principles to supply-chain diligence to avoid costly import bans targeting forced labor.

Corporate compliance programs are now being urged to treat forced-labor prevention with the same rigor as anti-corruption efforts. This shift is driven by aggressive enforcement of laws like the US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which establishes a rebuttable presumption that goods from certain regions are made with forced labor and are therefore banned from importation. The guide explains that this reverses the burden of proof, requiring importers to affirmatively demonstrate that their supply chains are clean through extensive due diligence and traceability measures. For sophisticated counsel and clients, this transforms supply-chain ethics from a reputational concern into a critical legal and business continuity risk. Failure to adapt can lead to shipment seizures, significant financial loss, and severe brand damage. Companies should now be integrating forced-labor risk assessments directly into their existing compliance frameworks and mapping supply chains beyond direct suppliers to prepare for potential enforcement actions.

forced-laborsupply-chaincomplianceinternational-tradeuflpaanti-corruption
Read the full dispatch →
12 — IP / PATENT2
McDermott Will & Emery+ Expand
CAFC Rejects Advocacy Group Standing in Patent Language Suit

The Federal Circuit held that inventor-advocacy groups lack Article III standing to sue the USPTO over allegedly misleading patent-grant language, finding that diverting resources to educate members is not a legally cognizable injury.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a suit by inventor advocacy groups challenging the "right to exclude" language on US patent grants. In US Inventor, Inc. v. Squires, the plaintiffs argued this language became misleading after the Supreme Court's eBay v. MercExchange decision made injunctive relief for infringement discretionary. The court found the groups lacked both organizational and associational standing.

standingfederal-circuitusptopatent-litigationarticle-iiiadministrative-law
Read the full dispatch →
Polsinelli+ Expand
Fed. Cir. Curbs NPE Pre-Suit Damages in Marking Case

A Federal Circuit decision holds that non-practicing entities must make reasonable efforts to ensure their licensees comply with patent marking rules or risk forfeiting pre-suit damages in future enforcement actions.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of infringement claims in 'VDPP, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.,' ruling that the non-practicing entity (NPE) plaintiff could not claim pre-suit damages because it failed to police its licensees' compliance with patent marking statutes.

This decision is important because it extends the marking obligations under 35 U.S.C. § 287 to an NPE’s licensees, limiting the traditional view that NPEs without products are exempt from marking rules. The court found that VDPP's prior settlement agreements, which licensed the patent to other companies, created a duty for VDPP to make reasonable efforts to ensure those licensees marked their products. The failure to do so—and in one case, expressly waiving the marking requirement—was fatal to its claim for damages preceding actual notice of infringement.

patent-markingnpefederal-circuitpatent-litigationpatent-damageslicensingsettlement
Read the full dispatch →
13 — LITIGATION / APPELLATE1
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
English Court Clarifies Anti-Suit Injunctions in Sanctions Cases

Two recent Court of Appeal decisions chart the boundaries for granting anti-suit injunctions against foreign proceedings, offering key lessons on drafting and dispute strategy for Russia-related matters.

In two recent decisions, the UK Court of Appeal clarified the dividing line for granting anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) to block Russian legal proceedings arising from sanctions. The court refused an ASI in FH Holding v UniCredit, where a foreclosure action was brought in Moscow under a specific Russian-law mortgage agreement, finding this did not breach a Vienna arbitration clause in a related facility agreement. Conversely, in JP Morgan v VTB, it granted an ASI to stop Russian tort claims, deeming them a vexatious attempt to circumvent London arbitration agreements and UK sanctions using purpose-built Russian laws.

anti-suit-injunctionsanctionsrussiaarbitrationjurisdiction-clauselitigationcourt-of-appealchoice-of-law
Read the full dispatch →
14 — PRIVACY / DATA SECURITY2
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr+ Expand
Washington AG Report Flags Enforcement Risk, Pushes for New Law

The state's first-ever Data Privacy Report calls for a comprehensive new statute and signals that the attorney general's office may use existing tools to pursue privacy-related harms.

Washington's Attorney General has released the state's first-ever Data Privacy Report, renewing the push for comprehensive privacy legislation after several years of stalled efforts. Although Washington has yet to pass a broad privacy law like those in California or Virginia, its previous proposals have served as influential blueprints for other states, making this development nationally significant. The report identifies four key concerns: overcollection and secondary use of data, weak consent mechanisms and deceptive design, the sale of sensitive data like biometrics and geolocation, and a lack of transparency in the data-broker industry. For businesses, the report signals that the AG’s office is actively monitoring for privacy-related harms and may use existing tools for enforcement, citing FTC actions against data brokers as examples. Counsel should monitor for new legislative proposals and anticipate increased enforcement scrutiny, particularly regarding the handling of sensitive consumer data and the operations of data brokers.

washingtondata-privacystate-privacy-lawattorney-generalenforcementdata-brokersconsumer-data
Read the full dispatch →
Seyfarth Shaw+ Expand
CA Bill to Curb Website Tracking Suits Awaits Governor's Signature

Businesses facing a wave of class actions under the California Invasion of Privacy Act may soon see relief, as a new bill targeting website "pen register" claims has been sent to the governor.

California's legislature has passed SB 690, a bill that would curb a recent surge of litigation targeting common website tracking technologies. The bill, now awaiting the governor's signature, specifically eliminates the private right of action for claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act’s (CIPA) “pen register” and “trap and trace” provisions.

This is a critical development for businesses, as plaintiffs have been leveraging these wiretapping-era statutes to bring class actions over the use of routine tools like analytics pixels and cookies, seeking statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation without proving actual harm. If signed, the law would apply retroactively to many pending cases, offering immediate relief to defendants.

cipasb-690privacy-litigationwebsite-trackingclass-actionpen-registercalifornia
Read the full dispatch →
15 — REGULATORY / GOVERNMENT1
Venable+ Expand
Michigan Ballot Measure Proposes Sweeping Pay-to-Play Rules

A Michigan ballot initiative expected in November would impose broad new political contribution restrictions on utilities, government contractors, and their many affiliates.

A Michigan ballot measure slated for the November election proposes one of the nation's most extensive "pay-to-play" laws, creating significant compliance risks for companies doing business in the state. The proposed law would bar political contributions from regulated electric and gas utilities as well as companies holding or seeking state or local government contracts over $250,000. Crucially, the restrictions extend far beyond the corporate entities themselves to cover their "principals"—a broadly defined group including directors, senior officers, 5% owners, lobbyists, and certain immediate family members. The rules would also apply to "affiliated entities," which could implicate corporate PACs and trade associations. The expansive scope means national corporations with Michigan operations will need to re-evaluate their political giving compliance programs and carefully track the personal contributions of a wide range of individuals. If passed, most provisions would take effect 10 days after the election is certified, requiring swift preparation.

pay-to-playmichigangovernment-contractsutilitiespolitical-contributionslobbyingelection-law
Read the full dispatch →
16 — SANCTIONS / EXPORT CONTROLS1
King & Spalding+ Expand
US Expands Iran Sanctions to Target Third-Country Enablers

The Treasury and State Departments announced a significant escalation of the Iran sanctions program, targeting new economic sectors and threatening secondary sanctions against non-U.S. companies that facilitate Iranian trade.

On August 24, 2026, the U.S. government initiated "Operation Economic Outcast," a major escalation of its Iran sanctions program aimed at third-country enablers. The initiative imposes new sectoral sanctions on Iran's digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping industries. Concurrently, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) suspended five general licenses that had previously authorized certain educational, remittance, and cultural exchange activities. The action also includes nearly 90 new designations of entities, individuals, and vessels across several countries. For sophisticated counsel, this signals a "zero-leakage" enforcement posture with heightened secondary sanctions risk for non-U.S. companies, which are now on notice to sever ties with Iran. The accompanying FinCEN Section 311 action against a UAE bank demonstrates a broader use of regulatory tools to isolate Iran from the global financial system. Companies with any direct or indirect exposure to Iran should immediately review and update their compliance programs and screening protocols, as U.

iran-sanctionsofacsecondary-sanctionsfincenthird-country-risksectoral-sanctions
Read the full dispatch →
17 — SECURITIES / CAPITAL MARKETS4
Latham & Watkins+ Expand
SEC Proposes New Exemptions and Safe Harbor for Crypto Offerings

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed 'Regulation Crypto Assets,' a new framework creating tailored offering exemptions and a safe harbor for digital asset investment contracts.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a new framework intended to create a viable compliance path for cryptoasset offerings. The proposal, enjoying unified support from the commissioners, marks a significant shift from the prior administration's enforcement-led approach. It introduces two tailored offering exemptions: a "Startup Exemption" for raises up to $5 million and a tiered "Fundraising Exemption," modeled on Regulation A, for raises up to $75 million annually. It also establishes a safe harbor allowing an issuer to certify when its token is no longer part of an investment contract, addressing a core uncertainty under the Howey test.

seccryptoregulation-crypto-assetssecuritiescapital-formationsafe-harboroffering-exemptions
Read the full dispatch →
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
SCOTUS: SEC Disgorgement Does Not Require Investor Loss

A unanimous Supreme Court held the SEC may recover a defendant's wrongful gains regardless of investor financial loss, but a concurrence questions whether disgorgement now triggers a right to a jury trial.

In Sripetch v. SEC, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the Securities and Exchange Commission may obtain disgorgement of a defendant's ill-gotten gains without proving that investors suffered a corresponding financial loss. Writing for the Court, Justice Gorsuch grounded the decision in traditional equitable principles, explaining that disgorgement is measured by the wrongdoer's gain, not the victim's loss. The ruling resolves a circuit split in the SEC's favor, preserving a powerful enforcement tool used to recover billions annually and foreclosing a key defense in cases like market manipulation or pump-and-dump schemes where proving investor harm is difficult.

disgorgementsec-enforcementsupreme-courtsecurities-litigationsripetch-v-secseventh-amendmentequitable-remedies
Read the full dispatch →
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner+ Expand
FCA Scraps Key IPO Rules to Bolster UK Capital Markets

The Financial Conduct Authority has eliminated the mandatory seven-day waiting period between prospectus and research publication and dropped equal information sharing rules for unconnected analysts to reduce costs and execution risk.

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has implemented significant deregulatory changes to the equity IPO process, effective August 5, 2026, via its Policy Statement PS26/16. The reforms remove two key requirements introduced in 2018: the mandatory seven-day gap between the publication of a prospectus and connected research, and the obligation to share the same information with unconnected analysts. The FCA concluded the prior regime failed to achieve its goals, as few unconnected analyst reports were published, while the rules added market risk and compliance costs, placing UK listings at a competitive disadvantage. The changes are expected to shorten the IPO timeline, reduce execution risk, and lower costs for issuers. Issuers and their advisers should immediately update internal IPO process documentation and precedent timetables. The FCA will consider further reforms, including a potential relaxation of guidance on pre-mandate issuer/analyst interactions.

ipofcauk-capital-marketssecurities-regulationprospectuslisting-rules
Read the full dispatch →
Perkins Coie+ Expand
SEC, FDA Formalize Cooperation on Public Company Disclosures

The two agencies have established a new framework for sharing non-public information, signaling a potential uptick in SEC enforcement actions concerning clinical trial data, product approvals, and safety matters.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Food and Drug Administration entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on August 31, 2026, to formalize and enhance cooperation and information sharing. The agreement establishes a direct channel for the agencies to exchange non-public information, increasing the likelihood that the SEC will scrutinize company disclosures against data submitted to the FDA.

For sophisticated counsel and their clients in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and medical device sectors, this signals a heightened risk of enforcement actions. Discrepancies between statements to investors and filings with the FDA regarding clinical trials, regulatory approval status, or product safety could become a primary source for SEC investigations. The agencies have created dedicated points of contact to streamline the process. FDA-regulated public companies should immediately review their disclosure controls and procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy across all regulatory and financial reporting. Counsel should monitor for an expected increase in SEC filing r

secfdamemorandum-of-understandingenforcementdisclosurelife-sciencespharma-biotech
Read the full dispatch →
18 — TAX1
Holland & Knight+ Expand
Treasury Expands Safe Harbor for 45Q Carbon-Capture Credit

New interim guidance extends the safe harbor for claiming carbon-capture tax credits, expands it to enhanced oil and gas recovery projects, and clarifies its use for recapture calculations.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2026-50, significantly expanding and extending an interim safe harbor for taxpayers claiming the Section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture and sequestration. The guidance responds to continued uncertainty caused by the EPA's proposal to remove certain reporting obligations (under Subpart RR) and its failure to launch its electronic reporting tool for the 2025 reporting year.

Sophisticated counsel should note three key changes. The relief is now extended to carbon oxide used as a tertiary injectant in qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery projects. The notice also confirms that taxpayers can rely on the safe harbor to determine amounts subject to recapture. Finally, the safe harbor's availability is extended beyond calendar year 2025, now applying to any year the EPA's reporting tool is not launched by March 31 of the following year, until further guidance is issued. This provides crucial planning certainty for clients developing and financing long-term carbon-capture projects.

section-45qcarbon-capturetax-creditsirstreasury-departmentsafe-harborenhanced-oil-recoveryepa
Read the full dispatch →
19 — TECHNOLOGY / AI2
Haynes and Boone+ Expand
Fifth Circuit Rejects Server Test for Embedded Content

In a case of first impression, the court adopted a new "transmit requirement" for direct copyright infringement claims, deepening a circuit split over the legality of embedding online content.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected the Ninth Circuit's long-standing "server test" for determining direct copyright infringement from embedded online content. In Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., the court established a new "transmit requirement," which asks which party's server transmitted the content to the end user and whether that transmission was authorized. This holding deepens a circuit split on a critical issue for any company operating a website that displays third-party material, from news aggregators to social media platforms. While the Fifth Circuit suggested its test may often produce similar results to the server test, the different legal reasoning creates significant uncertainty and risk for platforms operating nationwide. The court also found that URLs can, in some cases, qualify as "copyright management information" under the DMCA, creating another potential cause of action. The growing disagreement among federal circuits makes it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately intervene to establish a national stand

copyright-infringementembeddingcircuit-splitfifth-circuitserver-testdmca
Read the full dispatch →
Venable+ Expand
AI and Music Industry Pivot from Litigation to Licensing Deals

The legal and commercial strategy for AI in the music industry is shifting from infringement lawsuits to the development of complex licensing frameworks that govern model training and output.

The music industry's approach to artificial intelligence is evolving from litigation over unauthorized data scraping and deepfakes toward building a market for licensed uses. This shift reflects a maturing ecosystem where stakeholders are exploring workable deal structures rather than relying solely on legal challenges. Sophisticated counsel for both AI developers and rights holders must now navigate emerging multi-layered permission frameworks. These frameworks distinguish between rights for training AI models on existing catalogs and rights governing the output, such as fan remixes, professional productions, or sound-alikes prompted by users.

generative-aimusic-industrycopyrightlicensingright-of-publicityintellectual-property
Read the full dispatch →
20 — WHITE COLLAR / INVESTIGATIONS6
Akin Gump+ Expand
11th Circ. Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to FCA Qui Tam Actions

The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's finding that the False Claims Act's qui tam provisions violate the Appointments Clause, but remanded other Article II challenges for further review.

The Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court's unprecedented 2024 decision that had found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the appellate court held that private relators are not "Officers of the United States" requiring presidential appointment, aligning its view with every other circuit to have considered the question and resolving a threat to the government's primary anti-fraud tool.

false-claims-actqui-tameleventh-circuitappointments-clausearticle-iizafirov
Read the full dispatch →
Ropes & Gray+ Expand
11th Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of FCA Qui Tam Provisions

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed a landmark district court ruling, holding that False Claims Act whistleblowers are not "officers" under the Appointments Clause and allowing their suits to proceed.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, has reversed a district court decision that struck down the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provisions as unconstitutional. The lower court had reasoned that private relators (whistleblowers) act as "officers of the United States" and therefore must be appointed in accordance with Article II’s Appointments Clause. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed, holding that a relator does not occupy a "continuing position established by law" because their role is temporary, personal to a specific case, and not compensated by a government salary.

false-claims-actqui-tamwhistleblowereleventh-circuitappointments-clauseconstitutional-lawwhite-collar
Read the full dispatch →
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
UK Proposal Targets Platforms for User-Committed Fraud

A new report proposes extending corporate criminal liability to online platforms that fail to prevent fraud committed by their users, a significant expansion of the 'failure to prevent' model.

A report by Jonathan Fisher KC, 'Fraud in the Digital Age,' proposes creating a new corporate criminal offense in the UK for providers of regulated user-to-user services who fail to prevent fraud committed by users on their platforms. The proposal aims to close a perceived gap in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), whose 'failure to prevent fraud' offense applies only to fraud by a company's associates, not by independent third-party users.

If adopted, this would represent a material expansion of corporate criminal liability, making businesses responsible for offenses by people over whom they have no conventional control. The proposal would sit alongside the UK's new Online Safety Act 2023, which already imposes extensive regulatory duties on platforms to address illegal content, including fraud, backed by fines of up to 10% of global revenue. The government has not yet endorsed the proposal but is considering it.

failure-to-preventcorporate-crimeonline-safety-actfraudukonline-platformswhite-collar
Read the full dispatch →
King & Spalding+ Expand
New DOJ Fraud Division Memo Signals Healthcare Enforcement Push

The Department of Justice’s new National Fraud Enforcement Division will prioritize data-driven prosecutions targeting telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, and other healthcare schemes.

The Department of Justice’s recently formed National Fraud Enforcement Division has identified healthcare fraud as a primary enforcement priority. According to a memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald, the division will deploy advanced data analytics to proactively detect and prosecute fraudulent schemes in high-risk areas. These include telemedicine, Medicare and Medicaid billing, controlled substance diversion, and deceptive marketing of healthcare services.

dojhealthcare-fraudenforcement-prioritieswhite-collardata-analyticsinvestigations
Read the full dispatch →
BakerHostetler+ Expand
11th Cir. Upholds FCA Qui Tam Provision, Reversing District Court

Reversing a novel district court ruling, the panel held that private relators are not 'Officers of the United States' and their lawsuits do not violate the Appointments Clause.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed a district court decision that found the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions unconstitutional. In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the panel held that private relators who sue on behalf of the government are not 'Officers of the United States' under Article II's Appointments Clause. The decision overturns a first-of-its-kind ruling from the Middle District of Florida and aligns the Eleventh Circuit with every other appellate court to have considered the issue. The ruling restores the status quo for FCA defendants and eliminates, for now, a potent defense in the Eleventh Circuit, a major venue for these cases. However, the constitutional fight is not over. The panel remanded the case for the district court to consider the defendant's other constitutional challenges based on the Take Care and Vesting Clauses. Counsel should also monitor a similar pending case in the Third Circuit. Despite the current unanimity among the circuits, recent comments from several Supreme Court justices sugg

false-claims-actqui-tam11th-circuitappointments-clauseconstitutional-lawwhite-collarzafirov
Read the full dispatch →
Goodwin Procter+ Expand
DOJ Issues First Healthcare Declination Under New Corporate Enforcement Policy

The Department of Justice declined to prosecute a healthcare management company that self-disclosed fraud, while simultaneously indicting its former CEO for the scheme.

The Department of Justice has declined to prosecute Campus Eye Management Holdings under its new Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP), marking the first such declination for a healthcare company. The declination was granted after the company voluntarily disclosed misconduct, fully cooperated with investigators, and took remedial action, including agreeing to pay $1 million to affected patients. This resolution is a critical data point for corporate counsel and investors, as it demonstrates the tangible benefits of self-reporting under the new policy. However, it also powerfully illustrates the DOJ's focus on individual accountability. Concurrent with the corporate declination, the department unsealed a seven-count indictment against Campus Eye's founder and former CEO for allegedly orchestrating the $3.4 million Medicare billing fraud and kickback scheme. The case serves as a clear warning and a roadmap, signaling that while a company can earn leniency through cooperation, individuals responsible for the misconduct will be aggressively pursued. It highligh

dojcorporate-enforcement-policyhealthcare-fraudwhite-collarself-disclosuredeclinationindividual-accountability
Read the full dispatch →
Also noted

Grade 3 — worth a glance, not the full analysis.

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

One email when the daily AmLaw 100 briefing ships. No noise, no pitch decks — just the grade 4–5 signal.