Arthur Souza Rodrigues

DROPLETS

AmLaw 100 Legal Intelligence — Distilled
Friday, October 23, 202616 featured36 also noted34 firms10 practice areasgrade 3–5
Quick Scan — Why It Matters
Ballard SpahrWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
DOJ Launches Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Pilot With Pre-Conviction Payouts

DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division have opened a three-year pilot paying $10,000-$30,000 fixed awards for qualifying fraud tips, with the announcement indicating cash can flow before conviction.

The U.S. Department of Justice, together with its National Fraud Enforcement Division, has announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), a three-year pilot under which qualifying tips earn fixed awards of $10,000 to $30,000. The published headline indicates the payments are made before conviction, a point that would materially alter the incentive for insiders to report rather than stay silent. The development matters to major-firm clients with government contracts, healthcare billing operations, or other regulatory exposure because the prospect of a cash reward can raise tip volume against companies and individuals, put pressure on internal reporting channels and privilege positions, and change the economics of internal versus external referrals. Two uncertainties are worth flagging: the available reporting does not set out the program's full eligibility criteria, award tiers, or whether rewards attach to specific offences such as False Claims Act matters, and the pre-conviction characterisation derives from the alert's own headline rather than quoted programme terms. T

…

Read the full dispatch →
K&L GatesSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
SEC Proposes Rule 17a-7 Overhaul Restoring Cross Trading in Fixed Income

SEC's proposed amendments would restore most fixed-income securities to cross-trading eligibility, rewrite pricing rules, add best-interest and CCO reviews, and expand N-PORT reporting, with comments due 14 December 2026.

The SEC has proposed amendments to Rule 17a-7 that would reopen cross trading for registered investment companies, most consequentially by restoring most fixed-income securities that fell out of scope once the Rule 2a-5 valuation standard made "readily available" quotations a Level 1 requirement effective 8 September 2022. The proposal would allow pricing either at the price used in the fund's next NAV calculation (NAV Pricing) or at a price reasonably representing current market value drawn from unaffiliated pricing sources, including pricing vendors, broker-dealer quotes and electronic platforms, subject to periodic reasonableness reviews. It would also permit de minimis payments to unaffiliated parties for clearing, settlement, custody, recording and reporting, and require a pre-trade, best-interest determination by the adviser for each participating fund, separate from price adequacy.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Norton Rose FulbrightHealthcare+ Expand
HRSA Revises 340B Rebate Pilot as Hospitals Sue HHS to Block It

HRSA's reworked 340B Rebate Model Pilot converts three decades of point-of-sale discounts into post-purchase rebates from January 1, 2027, and hospital plaintiffs have already sued HHS and HRSA in Maine to stop it.

HRSA's revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot requires covered entities to buy 21 drugs from 10 manufacturers at WAC at point of sale and then claim manufacturer-administered rebates beginning January 1, 2027, reversing three decades of point-of-sale discounts. On October 9, 2026, the American Hospital Association, Maine Hospital Association and several safety-net hospitals sued HHS and HRSA in the District of Maine, alleging the design is arbitrary and capricious under the APA because the agencies did not weigh administrative costs, cash-flow strain and operational impacts, and seeking emergency injunctive relief.

The landscape shifted on July 21, 2026, when the D.C. Circuit affirmed that 340B permits rebate models and that manufacturers cannot unilaterally implement them; an earlier pilot was preliminarily enjoined in December 2025, and HHS later dismissed its appeal, prompting vacatur of the underlying notices.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Goodwin ProcterWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
DOJ and HHS-OIG Announce Coordinated Policy on Healthcare Fraud Disclosures

DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division and HHS-OIG have aligned their handling of voluntary self-disclosures in healthcare fraud matters, a change defense counsel should weigh before a client reports.

On October 15, 2026, the Department of Justice's National Fraud Enforcement Division and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General announced a coordinated policy on voluntary self-disclosures in healthcare fraud matters, according to Goodwin Procter. The announcement indicates that the two enforcement bodies have moved toward aligned treatment of self-disclosures rather than handling them independently — a recurring source of uncertainty for companies and executives weighing whether to report suspected fraud to one agency, the other, or both.

The significance here is procedural rather than plainly substantive. The available reporting describes the announcement but does not spell out the policy's terms: how the agencies will sequence their reviews, what credit a disclosing entity can expect, or whether a submission to one agency is treated as a disclosure to the other. Until the policy text is published, its practical effect on disclosure strategy should be treated as unconfirmed.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Mayer BrownLitigation / Appellate+ Expand
Eleventh Circuit Ends ERISA Exhaustion Requirement for Fiduciary-Breach Suits

Plan participants and ERISA defendants in the Eleventh Circuit now face a landscape where administrative exhaustion is no longer a precondition to suing over fiduciary breaches over plan investments.

The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has joined other circuits in holding that ERISA fiduciary-breach claims need not be administratively exhausted before being brought in federal court, according to a Mayer Brown alert published 22 October 2026. The material provided does not name the case or docket number, so the panel, disposition, and any limits on the holding should be confirmed against the slip opinion.

Exhaustion has been a standard early-stage defense in ERISA stock-drop and related securities class actions brought on behalf of pension plans whose trustees are accused of breaching fiduciary duties over plan investment decisions. Defendants have routinely moved to dismiss for failure to exhaust plan remedies; removing that requirement in one circuit erases a recurring motion-to-dismiss argument and may redirect filings toward that court.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoieAntitrust / Competition+ Expand
FTC Files Proposed Robinson-Patman Settlement With Southern Glazer's

The Federal Trade Commission filed a proposed settlement resolving its Robinson-Patman Act price-discrimination suit against Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, the largest U.S. wine and spirits distributor.

The Federal Trade Commission filed a proposed settlement on October 2, 2026, resolving its Robinson-Patman Act lawsuit against Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits, LLC, the largest wine and spirits distributor in the United States. The case concerns the price-discrimination statute that sits inside the Clayton Act and is enforced by the agency, not private plaintiffs.

Robinson-Patman enforcement has been infrequent in recent practice, so a settlement involving the country’s biggest beverage distributor is likely to be read closely by antitrust counsel. Sophisticated clients in wholesale distribution, wine and spirits, food, and other consumer-goods sectors will want to understand how the agency frames discriminatory pricing, promotional allowances, and cost-justification defenses in a negotiated resolution with a large, sophisticated respondent. Because the filing is a proposed settlement, the specific injunctive obligations, monitoring provisions, and any monetary or injunctive relief remain subject to change before the matter concludes, and the agency has not published a summary of

…

Read the full dispatch →
Norton Rose FulbrightAntitrust / Competition+ Expand
Court approves state AG settlement ending Paramount-WBD antitrust challenge

A California federal court approved a settlement on Sept. 30 ending 12 states' Clayton Act challenge to Paramount Skydance's $110 billion Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition, which closed Oct. 6.

Norton Rose Fulbright reports that on September 30 the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California approved a settlement between a coalition of 12 states and Paramount Skydance, ending the states' attempt to block Paramount's $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery under Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The states filed State of California v. Paramount Skydance Corp. on July 13, and the merger closed on October 6, so the settlement resolved rather than decided the merits; the source does not describe the settlement's terms, any conditions, or monitoring obligations.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Vinson & ElkinsAntitrust / Competition+ Expand
SDNY Preliminarily Enjoins New York's Algorithmic Rent-Setting Ban

A federal judge enjoined enforcement of New York GBL § 340-b(3) on landlords setting rents from coordinating-software recommendations, but left the Donnelly Act's software-facilitation ban intact.

On September 29, 2026, Judge Valerie Caproni of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York preliminarily enjoined the New York Attorney General from enforcing Section 3 of N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340-b, the Donnelly Act provision enacted in October 2025 that makes it unlawful for residential landlords to set or adjust rents, renewal terms or occupancy levels based on recommendations from software performing a "coordinating function." RealPage's facial First Amendment challenge succeeded: the court treated algorithmic pricing recommendations as commercial speech subject to Central Hudson, accepted the State's interest in preventing algorithmic collusion as substantial, but found the reasonable-fit showing "bare bones" and identified a less restrictive alternative — limiting the ban to software relying on non-public data from horizontal competitors. Section 2, which bars facilitating no-compete agreements among landlords through coordinating software, was not enjoined. The order is not limited to RealPage, but it is preliminary: as of October 20, 2026 the State had not

…

Read the full dispatch →
Akin GumpGovernment Contracts / Defense+ Expand
DPA Section 303 Determination Paves Way for Federal Support of Refining Capacity

A Section 303 Defense Production Act determination deems domestic refining and logistics capacity essential to national defense, waives statutory requirements and authorizes federal purchases and financial support.

Per Akin Gump's Trump executive order tracker, a presidential determination under Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 determines that domestic petroleum production, refining and logistics capacity are essential to national defense, waives statutory requirements under Section 303 to accelerate capacity expansion, and authorizes the Secretary of War (as the tracker describes it) to make purchases, commitments and provide financial support for related projects. The underlying document is posted on govinfo.gov and the White House site.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Faegre DrinkerAntitrust / Competition+ Expand
California's COMPETE Act expands Cartwright Act to single-firm monopolization

California's COMPETE Act bans single-company monopolization, so firms with substantial market power, including in labor markets, can no longer assess loyalty discounts, tying and exclusive dealing under federal antitrust law alone.

California's COMPETE Act amends the Cartwright Act to create state-law prohibitions on single-company monopolization, adding a route to challenge firms with substantial market power beyond what federal antitrust law reaches. Faegre Drinker advises that companies holding significant share in any market — expressly including labor markets — should not rely solely on federal case law when evaluating loyalty discounts, tying, self-preferencing and exclusive dealing arrangements, because California law now supplies its own framework for single-firm conduct.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Morgan, Lewis & BockiusSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
SEC Proposes Overhaul of Custody Rules for Advisers, Funds and BDCs

The SEC's October 2026 proposal would rewrite custody requirements for registered advisers, registered funds and BDCs, and open pathways for crypto assets to be held by advisers and funds.

According to a Morgan Lewis alert, on October 1, 2026 the US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed significant changes to the custody frameworks for registered investment advisers, registered investment companies and business development companies, including new pathways for crypto asset custody. The alert does not set out the operative rule text, the compliance date or the comment deadline, so the precise scope — which custody models would be permitted, what safekeeping standards would apply to digital assets, and how existing third-party custodian arrangements would be treated — remains unverified from this source alone.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightEnvironment / ESG / Climate+ Expand
California's Seven Data Center Laws Meet Bay Area City Responses

A Holland & Knight alert examines how Bay Area cities are responding to seven California data center laws signed September 21, 2026, covering review, power supply and water.

Holland & Knight's October 21 alert builds on its earlier note that California Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven data center laws on September 21, 2026, which will change how new data centers are reviewed, how they are powered and how they are supplied with water. The current alert turns to the municipal layer, framing the question as pause or playbook: whether Bay Area cities freeze new entitlements while the state framework settles, or issue local rules that condition approvals on power, water and environmental review. This alert does not itemize the specific cities or the operative provisions, so those mechanics remain unconfirmed in this source.

Why sophisticated counsel and clients care: for data center developers, real estate investors, utilities and technology tenants, the municipal approval calendar is now a binding constraint on site selection, capital deployment and lease commencement. Power availability, water supply and review timelines convert directly into schedule risk, carrying cost and valuation, and they sit alongside grid, rate and permitting exposure.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Paul HastingsSanctions / Export Controls+ Expand
Treasury Levies First OISP Penalty Over Unreported China AI Investment

Treasury's first-ever Outbound Investment Security Program penalty, announced October 7, 2026, hits Amidi LLC for a missing notification on a $92,478 investment by its Chinese subsidiary in a robotics and AI company.

On October 7, 2026, Treasury announced its first civil penalty under the Outbound Investment Security Program (OISP, 31 C.F.R. Part 850): $200,000 against Amidi LLC, the Plug and Play Tech Center parent, for failing to notify Treasury of a $92,478 April 2025 investment by its Chinese subsidiary in Shanghai Qiongche Intelligent Technology Co., a robotics, AI and embodied-intelligence company. Treasury said it identified the deal through routine compliance and market monitoring and chose a notification failure rather than a prohibited transaction or a large deal.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Sullivan & CromwellFinancial Regulation+ Expand
SEC Proposes Overhauled Custody Rules and Crypto Custody Framework

SEC's October 1, 2026 proposal would build a crypto custody framework, permit limited adviser self-custody, and revise Advisers Act and Investment Company Act custody rules; comments due December 7, 2026.

Per Sullivan & Cromwell's October 22, 2026 memo, the SEC proposed amendments on October 1, 2026 to the Investment Company Act and Investment Advisers Act custody rules, creating an express federal framework for crypto custody. The proposal would permit state trust companies to act as crypto custodians subject to initial and annual diligence, and allow adviser self-custody only where no qualified custodian is available, with private-key controls requiring dual authorization including a management person, independent control reports, and added board oversight for regulated funds. It would also add an exception for advisers with discretionary trading authority, including non-DVP settlement of loans and privately offered securities; ease audit requirements, including dropping PCAOB-registration conditions for accountants and extending fund-of-funds delivery deadlines; and expand broker-dealer custody options for funds while clarifying BDC reliance. The proposal would redesignate Rule 206(4)-2 as Rule 223-1 and, according to the memo, leaves uncertificated-loan relief unaddressed. It foll

…

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightFintech / Crypto+ Expand
Federal court trims state licensing claims, leaves prediction-market tax question open

In Coinbase Financial Markets v. Raoul, a Chicago federal district court appears to have given prediction market operators a win on state licensing while signaling states may still tax event contracts, depending on contract design.

A Chicago federal district court, in Coinbase Financial Markets v. Raoul consolidated with a second federal action (the full caption is not identified in the available reporting), appears to have granted prediction market operators a significant win on state licensing while leaving state taxation largely available. The reported outcome suggests state licensing regimes may not preempt the federal framework governing event contracts, but that whether a given platform's structure is taxable turns on how the contracts are designed and classified. The drafting distinction is the practically important one: taxability, fee flows and platform structure all follow from how a product is built.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Morgan, Lewis & BockiusSecurities / Capital Markets+ Expand
SEC Approval of FINRA Rule 2210 Broadens Projected Performance Use

SEC approval of FINRA Rule 2210 amendments lets broker-dealers use projected performance and targeted returns in communications on securities, portfolios and asset allocations, with reasonable-basis and documentation duties.

Per a Morgan Lewis alert republished on Oct. 22, 2026, the SEC has approved FINRA's amendments to Rule 2210, the rule governing communications by member firms with the public. The amendments would permit broker-dealers to include projected performance and targeted returns in communications concerning securities, securities portfolios, asset allocations and other investments, areas where such figures were previously restricted. Firms relying on the new permission would, per the source, need a reasonable basis for any projection and must document the basis and assumptions used.

…

Read the full dispatch →
DIG DEEPER
MOST CONSEQUENTIALDOJ Launches Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Pilot With Pre-Conviction Payouts

DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division have opened a three-year pilot paying $10,000-$30,000 fixed awards for qualifying fraud tips, with the announcement indicating cash can flow before conviction.

The U.S. Department of Justice, together with its National Fraud Enforcement Division, has announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), a three-year pilot under which qualifying tips earn fixed awards of $10,000 to $30,000. The published headline indicates the payments are made before conviction, a point that would materially alter the incentive for insiders to report rather than stay silent. The development matters to major-firm clients with government contracts, healthcare billing operations, or other regulatory exposure because the prospect of a cash reward can raise tip volume against companies and individuals, put pressure on internal reporting channels and privilege positions, and change the economics of internal versus external referrals. Two uncertainties are worth flagging: the available reporting does not set out the program's full eligibility criteria, award tiers, or whether rewards attach to specific offences such as False Claims Act matters, and the pre-conviction characterisation derives from the alert's own headline rather than quoted programme terms. T

…

Ballard SpahrWhite Collar / Investigations
whistleblower-rewardsfalse-claims-actdoj-enforcementinternal-investigationsqui-tamfraud-enforcement
AR
Today's Curator
Arthur Rodrigues. Corporate Counsel & Corporate Secretary at Teachable, Inc. Founder of Cicero Intelligent Minds. Former BigLaw (O'Melveny, Weil, Hughes Hubbard). JD/LLM Michigan Law. Droplets is a personal project; the views are his own, not Teachable's.
Full Analysis — The Details
01 — ANTITRUST / COMPETITION4
Perkins Coie+ Expand
FTC Files Proposed Robinson-Patman Settlement With Southern Glazer's

The Federal Trade Commission filed a proposed settlement resolving its Robinson-Patman Act price-discrimination suit against Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, the largest U.S. wine and spirits distributor.

The Federal Trade Commission filed a proposed settlement on October 2, 2026, resolving its Robinson-Patman Act lawsuit against Southern Glazer’s Wine and Spirits, LLC, the largest wine and spirits distributor in the United States. The case concerns the price-discrimination statute that sits inside the Clayton Act and is enforced by the agency, not private plaintiffs.

Robinson-Patman enforcement has been infrequent in recent practice, so a settlement involving the country’s biggest beverage distributor is likely to be read closely by antitrust counsel. Sophisticated clients in wholesale distribution, wine and spirits, food, and other consumer-goods sectors will want to understand how the agency frames discriminatory pricing, promotional allowances, and cost-justification defenses in a negotiated resolution with a large, sophisticated respondent. Because the filing is a proposed settlement, the specific injunctive obligations, monitoring provisions, and any monetary or injunctive relief remain subject to change before the matter concludes, and the agency has not published a summary of

…

ftc-enforcementrobinson-patman-actprice-discriminationwholesale-distributionantitrust-settlement
Read the full dispatch →
Norton Rose Fulbright+ Expand
Court approves state AG settlement ending Paramount-WBD antitrust challenge

A California federal court approved a settlement on Sept. 30 ending 12 states' Clayton Act challenge to Paramount Skydance's $110 billion Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition, which closed Oct. 6.

Norton Rose Fulbright reports that on September 30 the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California approved a settlement between a coalition of 12 states and Paramount Skydance, ending the states' attempt to block Paramount's $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery under Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The states filed State of California v. Paramount Skydance Corp. on July 13, and the merger closed on October 6, so the settlement resolved rather than decided the merits; the source does not describe the settlement's terms, any conditions, or monitoring obligations.

…

paramount-skydancewarner-bros-discoverystate-attorneys-generalclayton-actmerger-reviewmedia-antitrustantitrust-settlement
Read the full dispatch →
Vinson & Elkins+ Expand
SDNY Preliminarily Enjoins New York's Algorithmic Rent-Setting Ban

A federal judge enjoined enforcement of New York GBL § 340-b(3) on landlords setting rents from coordinating-software recommendations, but left the Donnelly Act's software-facilitation ban intact.

On September 29, 2026, Judge Valerie Caproni of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York preliminarily enjoined the New York Attorney General from enforcing Section 3 of N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340-b, the Donnelly Act provision enacted in October 2025 that makes it unlawful for residential landlords to set or adjust rents, renewal terms or occupancy levels based on recommendations from software performing a "coordinating function." RealPage's facial First Amendment challenge succeeded: the court treated algorithmic pricing recommendations as commercial speech subject to Central Hudson, accepted the State's interest in preventing algorithmic collusion as substantial, but found the reasonable-fit showing "bare bones" and identified a less restrictive alternative — limiting the ban to software relying on non-public data from horizontal competitors. Section 2, which bars facilitating no-compete agreements among landlords through coordinating software, was not enjoined. The order is not limited to RealPage, but it is preliminary: as of October 20, 2026 the State had not

…

new-york-rent-algorithmalgorithmic-pricingrealpagefirst-amendmentcentral-hudsondonnelly-actpreliminary-injunctionantitrust
Read the full dispatch →
Faegre Drinker+ Expand
California's COMPETE Act expands Cartwright Act to single-firm monopolization

California's COMPETE Act bans single-company monopolization, so firms with substantial market power, including in labor markets, can no longer assess loyalty discounts, tying and exclusive dealing under federal antitrust law alone.

California's COMPETE Act amends the Cartwright Act to create state-law prohibitions on single-company monopolization, adding a route to challenge firms with substantial market power beyond what federal antitrust law reaches. Faegre Drinker advises that companies holding significant share in any market — expressly including labor markets — should not rely solely on federal case law when evaluating loyalty discounts, tying, self-preferencing and exclusive dealing arrangements, because California law now supplies its own framework for single-firm conduct.

…

california-cartwright-actcompete-actsingle-company-monopolizationstate-antitrustmarket-powerlabor-market-monopolizationloyalty-discountsexclusive-dealing
Read the full dispatch →
02 — ENVIRONMENT / ESG / CLIMATE1
Holland & Knight+ Expand
California's Seven Data Center Laws Meet Bay Area City Responses

A Holland & Knight alert examines how Bay Area cities are responding to seven California data center laws signed September 21, 2026, covering review, power supply and water.

Holland & Knight's October 21 alert builds on its earlier note that California Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven data center laws on September 21, 2026, which will change how new data centers are reviewed, how they are powered and how they are supplied with water. The current alert turns to the municipal layer, framing the question as pause or playbook: whether Bay Area cities freeze new entitlements while the state framework settles, or issue local rules that condition approvals on power, water and environmental review. This alert does not itemize the specific cities or the operative provisions, so those mechanics remain unconfirmed in this source.

Why sophisticated counsel and clients care: for data center developers, real estate investors, utilities and technology tenants, the municipal approval calendar is now a binding constraint on site selection, capital deployment and lease commencement. Power availability, water supply and review timelines convert directly into schedule risk, carrying cost and valuation, and they sit alongside grid, rate and permitting exposure.

…

data-centerscalifornialand-use-permittingenvironmental-reviewenergy-watermoratoriabay-area
Read the full dispatch →
03 — FINANCIAL REGULATION1
Sullivan & Cromwell+ Expand
SEC Proposes Overhauled Custody Rules and Crypto Custody Framework

SEC's October 1, 2026 proposal would build a crypto custody framework, permit limited adviser self-custody, and revise Advisers Act and Investment Company Act custody rules; comments due December 7, 2026.

Per Sullivan & Cromwell's October 22, 2026 memo, the SEC proposed amendments on October 1, 2026 to the Investment Company Act and Investment Advisers Act custody rules, creating an express federal framework for crypto custody. The proposal would permit state trust companies to act as crypto custodians subject to initial and annual diligence, and allow adviser self-custody only where no qualified custodian is available, with private-key controls requiring dual authorization including a management person, independent control reports, and added board oversight for regulated funds. It would also add an exception for advisers with discretionary trading authority, including non-DVP settlement of loans and privately offered securities; ease audit requirements, including dropping PCAOB-registration conditions for accountants and extending fund-of-funds delivery deadlines; and expand broker-dealer custody options for funds while clarifying BDC reliance. The proposal would redesignate Rule 206(4)-2 as Rule 223-1 and, according to the memo, leaves uncertificated-loan relief unaddressed. It foll

…

sec-custody-rulecrypto-custodyinvestment-advisers-actinvestment-company-actadviser-self-custodystate-trust-companyrule-17f-1comment-deadline
Read the full dispatch →
04 — FINTECH / CRYPTO1
Holland & Knight+ Expand
Federal court trims state licensing claims, leaves prediction-market tax question open

In Coinbase Financial Markets v. Raoul, a Chicago federal district court appears to have given prediction market operators a win on state licensing while signaling states may still tax event contracts, depending on contract design.

A Chicago federal district court, in Coinbase Financial Markets v. Raoul consolidated with a second federal action (the full caption is not identified in the available reporting), appears to have granted prediction market operators a significant win on state licensing while leaving state taxation largely available. The reported outcome suggests state licensing regimes may not preempt the federal framework governing event contracts, but that whether a given platform's structure is taxable turns on how the contracts are designed and classified. The drafting distinction is the practically important one: taxability, fee flows and platform structure all follow from how a product is built.

…

prediction-marketsfintechstate-taxationcoinbaseillinoisgambling-regulationpreemption
Read the full dispatch →
05 — GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS / DEFENSE1
Akin Gump+ Expand
DPA Section 303 Determination Paves Way for Federal Support of Refining Capacity

A Section 303 Defense Production Act determination deems domestic refining and logistics capacity essential to national defense, waives statutory requirements and authorizes federal purchases and financial support.

Per Akin Gump's Trump executive order tracker, a presidential determination under Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 determines that domestic petroleum production, refining and logistics capacity are essential to national defense, waives statutory requirements under Section 303 to accelerate capacity expansion, and authorizes the Secretary of War (as the tracker describes it) to make purchases, commitments and provide financial support for related projects. The underlying document is posted on govinfo.gov and the White House site.

…

defense-production-actexecutive-orderrefining-capacitypetroleum-supplyfederal-financial-supportpermitting-waiversnational-defense
Read the full dispatch →
06 — HEALTHCARE1
Norton Rose Fulbright+ Expand
HRSA Revises 340B Rebate Pilot as Hospitals Sue HHS to Block It

HRSA's reworked 340B Rebate Model Pilot converts three decades of point-of-sale discounts into post-purchase rebates from January 1, 2027, and hospital plaintiffs have already sued HHS and HRSA in Maine to stop it.

HRSA's revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot requires covered entities to buy 21 drugs from 10 manufacturers at WAC at point of sale and then claim manufacturer-administered rebates beginning January 1, 2027, reversing three decades of point-of-sale discounts. On October 9, 2026, the American Hospital Association, Maine Hospital Association and several safety-net hospitals sued HHS and HRSA in the District of Maine, alleging the design is arbitrary and capricious under the APA because the agencies did not weigh administrative costs, cash-flow strain and operational impacts, and seeking emergency injunctive relief.

The landscape shifted on July 21, 2026, when the D.C. Circuit affirmed that 340B permits rebate models and that manufacturers cannot unilaterally implement them; an earlier pilot was preliminarily enjoined in December 2025, and HHS later dismissed its appeal, prompting vacatur of the underlying notices.

…

340b-programrebate-model-pilothrsahealth-systemsadministrative-procedure-acthospital-cash-flowdrug-manufacturers340b-rebate-claims
Read the full dispatch →
07 — LITIGATION / APPELLATE1
Mayer Brown+ Expand
Eleventh Circuit Ends ERISA Exhaustion Requirement for Fiduciary-Breach Suits

Plan participants and ERISA defendants in the Eleventh Circuit now face a landscape where administrative exhaustion is no longer a precondition to suing over fiduciary breaches over plan investments.

The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has joined other circuits in holding that ERISA fiduciary-breach claims need not be administratively exhausted before being brought in federal court, according to a Mayer Brown alert published 22 October 2026. The material provided does not name the case or docket number, so the panel, disposition, and any limits on the holding should be confirmed against the slip opinion.

Exhaustion has been a standard early-stage defense in ERISA stock-drop and related securities class actions brought on behalf of pension plans whose trustees are accused of breaching fiduciary duties over plan investment decisions. Defendants have routinely moved to dismiss for failure to exhaust plan remedies; removing that requirement in one circuit erases a recurring motion-to-dismiss argument and may redirect filings toward that court.

…

erisaexhaustioneleventh-circuitfiduciary-dutystock-dropsecurities-class-actionemployee-benefits
Read the full dispatch →
08 — SANCTIONS / EXPORT CONTROLS1
Paul Hastings+ Expand
Treasury Levies First OISP Penalty Over Unreported China AI Investment

Treasury's first-ever Outbound Investment Security Program penalty, announced October 7, 2026, hits Amidi LLC for a missing notification on a $92,478 investment by its Chinese subsidiary in a robotics and AI company.

On October 7, 2026, Treasury announced its first civil penalty under the Outbound Investment Security Program (OISP, 31 C.F.R. Part 850): $200,000 against Amidi LLC, the Plug and Play Tech Center parent, for failing to notify Treasury of a $92,478 April 2025 investment by its Chinese subsidiary in Shanghai Qiongche Intelligent Technology Co., a robotics, AI and embodied-intelligence company. Treasury said it identified the deal through routine compliance and market monitoring and chose a notification failure rather than a prohibited transaction or a large deal.

…

outbound-investment-securitytreasury-oispchina-ai-investmentnational-security-investmentcompliance-controlscoins-actexport-controls
Read the full dispatch →
09 — SECURITIES / CAPITAL MARKETS3
K&L Gates+ Expand
SEC Proposes Rule 17a-7 Overhaul Restoring Cross Trading in Fixed Income

SEC's proposed amendments would restore most fixed-income securities to cross-trading eligibility, rewrite pricing rules, add best-interest and CCO reviews, and expand N-PORT reporting, with comments due 14 December 2026.

The SEC has proposed amendments to Rule 17a-7 that would reopen cross trading for registered investment companies, most consequentially by restoring most fixed-income securities that fell out of scope once the Rule 2a-5 valuation standard made "readily available" quotations a Level 1 requirement effective 8 September 2022. The proposal would allow pricing either at the price used in the fund's next NAV calculation (NAV Pricing) or at a price reasonably representing current market value drawn from unaffiliated pricing sources, including pricing vendors, broker-dealer quotes and electronic platforms, subject to periodic reasonableness reviews. It would also permit de minimis payments to unaffiliated parties for clearing, settlement, custody, recording and reporting, and require a pre-trade, best-interest determination by the adviser for each participating fund, separate from price adequacy.

…

rule-17a7-cross-tradingsec-rulemakinginvestment-company-actfund-valuationasset-managementfund-oversight-ccon-port-reporting
Read the full dispatch →
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius+ Expand
SEC Proposes Overhaul of Custody Rules for Advisers, Funds and BDCs

The SEC's October 2026 proposal would rewrite custody requirements for registered advisers, registered funds and BDCs, and open pathways for crypto assets to be held by advisers and funds.

According to a Morgan Lewis alert, on October 1, 2026 the US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed significant changes to the custody frameworks for registered investment advisers, registered investment companies and business development companies, including new pathways for crypto asset custody. The alert does not set out the operative rule text, the compliance date or the comment deadline, so the precise scope — which custody models would be permitted, what safekeeping standards would apply to digital assets, and how existing third-party custodian arrangements would be treated — remains unverified from this source alone.

…

sec-custody-rulesregistered-investment-advisersregistered-fundscrypto-custodybusiness-development-companiessecurities-regulation
Read the full dispatch →
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius+ Expand
SEC Approval of FINRA Rule 2210 Broadens Projected Performance Use

SEC approval of FINRA Rule 2210 amendments lets broker-dealers use projected performance and targeted returns in communications on securities, portfolios and asset allocations, with reasonable-basis and documentation duties.

Per a Morgan Lewis alert republished on Oct. 22, 2026, the SEC has approved FINRA's amendments to Rule 2210, the rule governing communications by member firms with the public. The amendments would permit broker-dealers to include projected performance and targeted returns in communications concerning securities, securities portfolios, asset allocations and other investments, areas where such figures were previously restricted. Firms relying on the new permission would, per the source, need a reasonable basis for any projection and must document the basis and assumptions used.

…

finra-rule-2210projected-performancetargeted-returnsbroker-dealer-communicationssec-approvalmarketing-compliance-review
Read the full dispatch →
10 — WHITE COLLAR / INVESTIGATIONS2
Ballard Spahr+ Expand
DOJ Launches Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Pilot With Pre-Conviction Payouts

DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division have opened a three-year pilot paying $10,000-$30,000 fixed awards for qualifying fraud tips, with the announcement indicating cash can flow before conviction.

The U.S. Department of Justice, together with its National Fraud Enforcement Division, has announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), a three-year pilot under which qualifying tips earn fixed awards of $10,000 to $30,000. The published headline indicates the payments are made before conviction, a point that would materially alter the incentive for insiders to report rather than stay silent. The development matters to major-firm clients with government contracts, healthcare billing operations, or other regulatory exposure because the prospect of a cash reward can raise tip volume against companies and individuals, put pressure on internal reporting channels and privilege positions, and change the economics of internal versus external referrals. Two uncertainties are worth flagging: the available reporting does not set out the program's full eligibility criteria, award tiers, or whether rewards attach to specific offences such as False Claims Act matters, and the pre-conviction characterisation derives from the alert's own headline rather than quoted programme terms. T

…

whistleblower-rewardsfalse-claims-actdoj-enforcementinternal-investigationsqui-tamfraud-enforcement
Read the full dispatch →
Goodwin Procter+ Expand
DOJ and HHS-OIG Announce Coordinated Policy on Healthcare Fraud Disclosures

DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division and HHS-OIG have aligned their handling of voluntary self-disclosures in healthcare fraud matters, a change defense counsel should weigh before a client reports.

On October 15, 2026, the Department of Justice's National Fraud Enforcement Division and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General announced a coordinated policy on voluntary self-disclosures in healthcare fraud matters, according to Goodwin Procter. The announcement indicates that the two enforcement bodies have moved toward aligned treatment of self-disclosures rather than handling them independently — a recurring source of uncertainty for companies and executives weighing whether to report suspected fraud to one agency, the other, or both.

The significance here is procedural rather than plainly substantive. The available reporting describes the announcement but does not spell out the policy's terms: how the agencies will sequence their reviews, what credit a disclosing entity can expect, or whether a submission to one agency is treated as a disclosure to the other. Until the policy text is published, its practical effect on disclosure strategy should be treated as unconfirmed.

…

healthcare-fraudvoluntary-self-disclosuredoj-fraud-divisionhhs-oigwhite-collar-enforcementinternal-investigations
Read the full dispatch →
Also noted

Grade 3 — worth a glance, not the full analysis.

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

Each weekday's issue by email, through Substack. Or follow the RSS feed.