Arthur Souza Rodrigues

DROPLETS

AmLaw 100 Legal Intelligence — Distilled
Saturday, October 24, 202615 featured52 also noted33 firms8 practice areasgrade 3–5
Quick Scan — Why It Matters
Hogan LovellsSanctions / Export Controls+ Expand
China Proposes New Export Controls on AI, Biotech and Solar Technology

MOFCOM and MOST jointly floated an October 16, 2026 expansion of China's export control regime covering AI, life sciences and photovoltaic technologies, with licensing and scope details still unconfirmed.

China's Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Science and Technology jointly issued a proposal on October 16, 2026 to expand the country's technology export control regime to cover AI, life sciences and photovoltaic technologies, according to Hogan Lovells. The measure appears to be a draft open for comment rather than a final rule, and the source excerpt does not specify the controlled items, licensing thresholds, effective date or comment period; those details should be verified against the Chinese-language texts before any advice is given.

The development matters for major-firm clients well beyond China. AI compute and semiconductor supply chains, biologics and laboratory-equipment exporters, and solar manufacturing participants all face the risk of tighter control categories, licensing, end-user and end-use screening for cross-border shipments, technology transfers and licensing arrangements with Chinese entities — and of parallel restrictions elsewhere, including outbound investment and export control responses by the EU, UK and US.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Ropes & GraySanctions / Export Controls+ Expand
China Proposes Export Restrictions on Advanced Biopharmaceutical Technology

China's MOFCOM and MOST issued Announcement No. 48 of 2026 proposing new export controls on advanced biopharmaceutical technology, with immediate registration requirements affecting cross-border life sciences deals.

On October 16, 2026, China's Ministry of Commerce and Ministry of Science and Technology jointly issued Announcement No. 48 of 2026, a proposal adding new export restrictions on certain advanced biopharmaceutical technologies and imposing immediate registration requirements for transfers of the covered technology. The measure is at the proposal stage, and the specific technology catalogue, licensing pathways, and mechanics of the registration regime are not set out in the material reviewed here; counsel should confirm scope against the official text and any comment or implementation timetable before advising clients.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Husch BlackwellWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
DOJ Launches WHIP, Paying Up-Front Awards for Fraud Tips

DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division announced WHIP on October 20, 2026, billed as the first federal whistleblower program paying an up-front award for tips, with award sizes and covered fraud matters still to come.

On October 20, 2026, DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), which DOJ characterizes as the first federal whistleblower program to pay an up-front award for tips rather than only a share of a later prosecution or settlement. The launch introduces a new financial pull for informants in fraud matters, affecting the reporting calculus for employees, counterparties and internal whistleblowers weighing whether to come forward.

The available source describes the program at announcement level only and does not set out which fraud matters qualify, how claims are scored, the size of up-front awards, or how WHIP interacts with existing SEC, CFTC and False Claims Act recovery mechanisms. Program terms, eligibility criteria and implementing guidance are the developments to watch.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoiePrivacy / Data Security+ Expand
Judge largely denies Apple summary judgment in BIPA biometric class action

Chief Judge Rosenstengel's ruling in Doe v. Apple (S.D. Ill.) keeps alive the Illinois BIPA class action over the Photos app's use of facial recognition, with implications for biometric-data litigation generally.

A federal judge in the Southern District of Illinois has largely denied summary judgment to Apple Inc. in Doe v. Apple Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00421-NJR, the long-running putative class action under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act that concerns the company's Photos app and the facial-recognition and related biometric processing it performs on users' images. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel issued the ruling.

The significance for major-firm clients is the continued viability of BIPA class actions targeting the collection, scanning, and retention of facial data embedded in consumer applications, and the court's treatment of what constitutes a biometric identifier and of a user's "control" over it. Counsel representing consumer-technology, social-media, and device clients should expect the decision to be examined in related actions and in class-certification and damages phases of similar suits, and should assess whether consent, retention, and disclosure practices withstand a summary-judgment challenge on comparable facts.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Sheppard MullinFintech / Crypto+ Expand
OCC Finalizes GENIUS Act Rules for Payment Stablecoin Issuers

The OCC issued a final rule on October 21, 2026 implementing the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoin issuers, a development banks and fintechs should weigh before issuance decisions.

On October 21, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a final rule implementing the GENIUS Act as it applies to payment stablecoin issuers, according to a Sheppard Mullin alert published October 23, 2026. The alert reports the rule's issuance and its subject but does not set out the specific provisions, so the practical contours of any reserve, capital, custody, redemption, examination or supervisory requirements should be confirmed against the Federal Register text rather than assumed.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: GENIUS Act implementation is the gating item for any bank, payment institution or fintech weighing a payment stablecoin product, and the OCC's rule is the first agency-level implementation milestone for its supervised cohort. Clients with issuer, sponsor or reserve-provider roles will need to map rule obligations against product design, partner agreements and marketing claims, and will want to assess how OCC expectations interact with the implementing framework being developed by other federal agencies.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightWhite Collar / Investigations+ Expand
DOJ Opens First-Ever Up-Front Whistleblower Rewards for Fraud Tips

DOJ's new Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program pays an up-front award for information leading to criminal fraud charges, adding a payment-at-charge incentive to corporate fraud investigations.

On October 20, 2026, DOJ announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), which the Department describes as the first whistleblower rewards program paying an up-front award for information leading to criminal charges rather than for later conviction or settlement outcomes. Holland & Knight's report does not set out award amounts, eligibility criteria, funding, or how WHIP interacts with DOJ's existing corporate misconduct award program.

The reason sophisticated counsel should care is that a cash reward keyed to the filing of criminal charges changes the informant calculus for corporate fraud targets. Clients with fraud exposure should expect more tip-driven charging decisions and a premium on fast internal investigation and voluntary disclosure; defense teams should consider how award letters, informant identity, and award timing bear on privilege, spoliation, and internal reporting governance.

…

Read the full dispatch →
McGuireWoodsGovernment Contracts / Defense+ Expand
DoW Memo Directs Shift of Contractor Cost Accounting From CAS to GAAP

A September 2026 Department of War memorandum signed by Deputy Secretary Steve Feinberg directs the agency to move away from government-unique Cost Accounting Standards toward GAAP-based contract pricing.

Reported details remain thin: on September 14, 2026, Deputy Secretary of War Steve Feinberg signed a memorandum titled "Fostering One Strong Industrial Base," directing the Department of War (DoW) to shift away from government-unique Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) and toward generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For contractors, that is not a technicality. CAS governs allowability of direct and indirect costs, overhead allocation and the cost basis used to price proposals; GAAP treats many of those judgments differently. A GAAP-based pricing regime could reshape how future bids are built, require reconciliation of accumulated contract-cost data, change negotiated and ceiling price structures, and alter the accounting basis for revenue recognition on long-term work. Sophisticated counsel should review pending solicitations, existing indefinite-delivery vehicles and teaming arrangements for stranded cost-accounting investments, and weigh whether transition clauses, protests or claims strategies are warranted. What to watch: whether the memo is immediately operative or depen

…

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightSanctions / Export Controls+ Expand
Graham Act Codifies Russia Sanctions; Presidential Waiver Defers Most Risk

A new U.S. statute pulls much of the Russia sanctions program out of executive orders and into law, but a presidential waiver defers most of the resulting client exposure.

The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (P.L. 119-111), signed into law on September 18, 2026, seeks to codify the existing executive order-based Russia sanctions program — a structural shift for compliance teams that have long tracked OFAC's evolving directives. Per a Holland & Knight analysis published October 23, 2026, however, a presidential waiver defers most of the practical exposure the statute creates, making near-term risk largely prospective rather than immediate.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Husch BlackwellFintech / Crypto+ Expand
CFTC Interim Final Rule Redefines Swap for Prediction Markets

The CFTC's interim final rule on prediction market swaps is effective while its companion event-contract rule is open for comment, forcing clients to re-test whether their event contracts and binary products now count as regulated swaps.

On September 28, 2026, the CFTC submitted to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs two proposed rules that would further define the term "swap" as part of its treatment of prediction markets. One has advanced to an effective interim final rule; the other remains open for public comment, according to a Husch Blackwell client alert. (The alert text available here is truncated, so the precise operative scope of each rule is not confirmed.)

Sophisticated clients care because "swap" status carries the full weight of CFTC derivatives regulation: designation and registration or listing pathways, reporting and recordkeeping obligations, and the compliance posture of venues and intermediaries. Firms with event contracts, binary or cash-settled outcome products, or offshore-facing offerings must now re-test whether those products fall inside the amended definition, and whether transitional relief or compliance timetables apply to existing positions and contracts already in place.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Cozen O'ConnorGovernment Contracts / Defense+ Expand
Maryland Court Denies Injunction on Federal Contractor DEI Order

A District of Maryland judge on Oct. 14, 2026 declined to enjoin Executive Order 14398, leaving the Administration's March 2026 federal contractor diversity, equity and inclusion order in force.

According to a single published alert from Cozen O'Connor, on October 14, 2026 the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied a preliminary injunction against Executive Order 14398, the Administration's March 2026 order addressing diversity, equity and inclusion among federal contractors. The practical effect of a denied preliminary injunction is that the order remains operative while the underlying challenge proceeds, so contractors subject to the order's requirements continue to face the compliance obligations it imposes, including whatever flow-down and reporting terms attach to federal procurement work.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: the ruling is a jurisdictional and interim procedural development rather than a merits decision, but it affects the operating posture of every contractor and subcontractor that relies on federal work. It also signals the near-term trajectory of a challenge that may produce appellate review of a contested executive-branch procurement directive.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightFintech / Crypto+ Expand
Ohio Regulator Backs Prediction Markets With Cease-and-Desist Letters

The Ohio Casino Control Commission confirmed at its October 21, 2026 meeting that it issued cease-and-desist letters to sports gaming and fantasy gaming licensees over their dealings with prediction markets.

Ohio's Casino Control Commission confirmed at its October 21, 2026 meeting that it has issued cease-and-desist letters to sports gaming and fantasy gaming licensees concerning their dealings with prediction markets, according to Holland & Knight. The available report is truncated and does not identify every recipient or the full scope of the orders, so the precise reach of the action remains uncertain.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: event-contract platforms sit at the intersection of derivatives-style federal oversight and state gaming law, and state regulators continue to push that boundary. An Ohio gaming regulator telling licensed operators to stand down, or to sever commercial ties with prediction-market venues, would directly affect sportsbooks' product strategy, market-access and affiliation agreements, and promotional placements, while adding another compliance front for platforms that assumed they sat outside state gaming regimes.

…

Read the full dispatch →
BakerHostetlerConsumer Protection+ Expand
FTC Sues Passport-Services Defendants Over Alleged Government Impersonation

The FTC alleges $40M+ taken from 300,000+ consumers via government-impersonating search ads, while its open comment period probes tougher platform duties under the impersonation rule.

On Oct. 22 the FTC sued GovAssist, Entry and owner Scott Zuckerman, alleging the passport-services operation collected more than $40 million from over 300,000 consumers. The complaint says sponsored Google results for terms like "passport renewal" led to sites using official-looking imagery, government-adjacent names and agency references to suggest State Department affiliation, and that disclaimers denying affiliation did not cure the overall message. Consumers reportedly received only application paperwork and still owed government fees, while portals told them applications had been submitted. Prices advertised "starting at $89" allegedly began at $119 before shipping, and three-to-four-business-day delivery was promised despite no ability to expedite State Department processing. The FTC also alleges fabricated Trustpilot reviews, though it did not plead the Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials; the claims are Section 5 of the FTC Act, the Impersonation of Government and Businesses Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Separately, the FTC is soliciting comment on wh

…

Read the full dispatch →
Paul HastingsFinancial Regulation+ Expand
OCC Finalizes GENIUS Act Payment Stablecoin Rules Effective January 2027

The OCC's final GENIUS Act rule, with revised stablecoin reporting forms and waiver guidance, takes effect January 18, 2027 for national banks, federal savings associations and foreign issuers.

On October 21, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a final rule implementing the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoin issuance, covering national banks, federal savings associations, federal branches and their subsidiaries, foreign payment stablecoin issuers, and nonbank or state entities pursuing federal qualified payment stablecoin issuer status. The rule takes effect January 18, 2027; Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering and OFAC sanctions rules are reserved for a separate Treasury-coordinated rulemaking. The OCC also finalized revised weekly and quarterly reporting forms for permitted and foreign issuers, open for 30-day comment, and issued a bulletin on waiver and application procedures.

Separately, Treasury proposed regulations under the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act restricting large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes and codifying Executive Order 14376.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Ballard SpahrSanctions / Export Controls+ Expand
OFAC and FinCEN Sanction 'A7 Network' as Global Sanctions-Evasion Infrastructure

Treasury's OFAC and FinCEN took joint action on October 1 against the A7 Network, described as global financial services infrastructure built to evade Iran- and Russia-linked sanctions.

On October 1, the US Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took joint action designating the "A7 Network," which the government describes as a global financial services infrastructure designed to evade sanctions, in connection with Iranian finance and Russia-linked sanctions evasion. The source is a single law-firm alert summarizing the action rather than the underlying Treasury materials, so the specific designated persons, entities, and legal authorities are not detailed here; counsel should read the primary OFAC and FinCEN releases for operative details.

…

Read the full dispatch →
SteptoeRegulatory / Government+ Expand
FCC Clears Further Covered List Conditional Approvals for US Sales

The FCC's latest conditional approvals give previously restricted equipment makers a conditional path back into the US market, raising diligence questions for hardware, telecom and security-sensitive clients.

What happened: the FCC has announced further conditional approvals under its Covered List framework, which Steptoe characterises as providing a path to US market access for affected communications equipment. The Covered List blocks the marketing, sale and import of equipment from named entities, and conditional approvals permit specified equipment to re-enter the US market subject to conditions rather than an outright ban. The available extract is a single firm alert and does not identify which vendors or equipment categories were approved, or the conditions imposed, so scope should be checked against the FCC orders.

Why counsel should care: the change reaches beyond one sector. Supply chains, carriers, federal contractors and security-sensitive buyers all screen hardware against the list, and it is enforced at equipment authorisation and import. A shift in access status can affect supplier qualification, installed base, support obligations and contractual provenance warranties.

…

Read the full dispatch →
DIG DEEPER
MOST CONSEQUENTIALChina Proposes New Export Controls on AI, Biotech and Solar Technology

MOFCOM and MOST jointly floated an October 16, 2026 expansion of China's export control regime covering AI, life sciences and photovoltaic technologies, with licensing and scope details still unconfirmed.

China's Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Science and Technology jointly issued a proposal on October 16, 2026 to expand the country's technology export control regime to cover AI, life sciences and photovoltaic technologies, according to Hogan Lovells. The measure appears to be a draft open for comment rather than a final rule, and the source excerpt does not specify the controlled items, licensing thresholds, effective date or comment period; those details should be verified against the Chinese-language texts before any advice is given.

The development matters for major-firm clients well beyond China. AI compute and semiconductor supply chains, biologics and laboratory-equipment exporters, and solar manufacturing participants all face the risk of tighter control categories, licensing, end-user and end-use screening for cross-border shipments, technology transfers and licensing arrangements with Chinese entities — and of parallel restrictions elsewhere, including outbound investment and export control responses by the EU, UK and US.

…

Hogan LovellsSanctions / Export Controls
export-controlschinaai-computelife-sciencesphotovoltaicmofcomsupply-chain
AR
Today's Curator
Arthur Rodrigues. Corporate Counsel & Corporate Secretary at Teachable, Inc. Founder of Cicero Intelligent Minds. Former BigLaw (O'Melveny, Weil, Hughes Hubbard). JD/LLM Michigan Law. Droplets is a personal project; the views are his own, not Teachable's.
Full Analysis — The Details
01 — CONSUMER PROTECTION1
BakerHostetler+ Expand
FTC Sues Passport-Services Defendants Over Alleged Government Impersonation

The FTC alleges $40M+ taken from 300,000+ consumers via government-impersonating search ads, while its open comment period probes tougher platform duties under the impersonation rule.

On Oct. 22 the FTC sued GovAssist, Entry and owner Scott Zuckerman, alleging the passport-services operation collected more than $40 million from over 300,000 consumers. The complaint says sponsored Google results for terms like "passport renewal" led to sites using official-looking imagery, government-adjacent names and agency references to suggest State Department affiliation, and that disclaimers denying affiliation did not cure the overall message. Consumers reportedly received only application paperwork and still owed government fees, while portals told them applications had been submitted. Prices advertised "starting at $89" allegedly began at $119 before shipping, and three-to-four-business-day delivery was promised despite no ability to expedite State Department processing. The FTC also alleges fabricated Trustpilot reviews, though it did not plead the Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials; the claims are Section 5 of the FTC Act, the Impersonation of Government and Businesses Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Separately, the FTC is soliciting comment on wh

…

ftcgovernment-impersonationdeceptive-advertisingsearch-adsfake-reviewsimpersonation-ruleadvertising-compliance
Read the full dispatch →
02 — FINANCIAL REGULATION1
Paul Hastings+ Expand
OCC Finalizes GENIUS Act Payment Stablecoin Rules Effective January 2027

The OCC's final GENIUS Act rule, with revised stablecoin reporting forms and waiver guidance, takes effect January 18, 2027 for national banks, federal savings associations and foreign issuers.

On October 21, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a final rule implementing the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoin issuance, covering national banks, federal savings associations, federal branches and their subsidiaries, foreign payment stablecoin issuers, and nonbank or state entities pursuing federal qualified payment stablecoin issuer status. The rule takes effect January 18, 2027; Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering and OFAC sanctions rules are reserved for a separate Treasury-coordinated rulemaking. The OCC also finalized revised weekly and quarterly reporting forms for permitted and foreign issuers, open for 30-day comment, and issued a bulletin on waiver and application procedures.

Separately, Treasury proposed regulations under the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act restricting large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes and codifying Executive Order 14376.

…

occ-genius-actpayment-stablecoinsstablecoin-reportingfinra-corporate-financingcryptoasset-perimetertreasury-housing-rule
Read the full dispatch →
03 — FINTECH / CRYPTO3
Sheppard Mullin+ Expand
OCC Finalizes GENIUS Act Rules for Payment Stablecoin Issuers

The OCC issued a final rule on October 21, 2026 implementing the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoin issuers, a development banks and fintechs should weigh before issuance decisions.

On October 21, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a final rule implementing the GENIUS Act as it applies to payment stablecoin issuers, according to a Sheppard Mullin alert published October 23, 2026. The alert reports the rule's issuance and its subject but does not set out the specific provisions, so the practical contours of any reserve, capital, custody, redemption, examination or supervisory requirements should be confirmed against the Federal Register text rather than assumed.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: GENIUS Act implementation is the gating item for any bank, payment institution or fintech weighing a payment stablecoin product, and the OCC's rule is the first agency-level implementation milestone for its supervised cohort. Clients with issuer, sponsor or reserve-provider roles will need to map rule obligations against product design, partner agreements and marketing claims, and will want to assess how OCC expectations interact with the implementing framework being developed by other federal agencies.

…

genius-actocc-final-rulepayment-stablecoinsdigital-assetsbanking-supervision
Read the full dispatch →
Husch Blackwell+ Expand
CFTC Interim Final Rule Redefines Swap for Prediction Markets

The CFTC's interim final rule on prediction market swaps is effective while its companion event-contract rule is open for comment, forcing clients to re-test whether their event contracts and binary products now count as regulated swaps.

On September 28, 2026, the CFTC submitted to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs two proposed rules that would further define the term "swap" as part of its treatment of prediction markets. One has advanced to an effective interim final rule; the other remains open for public comment, according to a Husch Blackwell client alert. (The alert text available here is truncated, so the precise operative scope of each rule is not confirmed.)

Sophisticated clients care because "swap" status carries the full weight of CFTC derivatives regulation: designation and registration or listing pathways, reporting and recordkeeping obligations, and the compliance posture of venues and intermediaries. Firms with event contracts, binary or cash-settled outcome products, or offshore-facing offerings must now re-test whether those products fall inside the amended definition, and whether transitional relief or compliance timetables apply to existing positions and contracts already in place.

…

cfctprediction-marketsevent-contractsswapsderivativesdigital-assetsrulemakingoira
Read the full dispatch →
Holland & Knight+ Expand
Ohio Regulator Backs Prediction Markets With Cease-and-Desist Letters

The Ohio Casino Control Commission confirmed at its October 21, 2026 meeting that it issued cease-and-desist letters to sports gaming and fantasy gaming licensees over their dealings with prediction markets.

Ohio's Casino Control Commission confirmed at its October 21, 2026 meeting that it has issued cease-and-desist letters to sports gaming and fantasy gaming licensees concerning their dealings with prediction markets, according to Holland & Knight. The available report is truncated and does not identify every recipient or the full scope of the orders, so the precise reach of the action remains uncertain.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: event-contract platforms sit at the intersection of derivatives-style federal oversight and state gaming law, and state regulators continue to push that boundary. An Ohio gaming regulator telling licensed operators to stand down, or to sever commercial ties with prediction-market venues, would directly affect sportsbooks' product strategy, market-access and affiliation agreements, and promotional placements, while adding another compliance front for platforms that assumed they sat outside state gaming regimes.

…

prediction-marketsevent-contractsstate-gaming-regulationcease-and-desistohio-casino-control
Read the full dispatch →
04 — GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS / DEFENSE2
McGuireWoods+ Expand
DoW Memo Directs Shift of Contractor Cost Accounting From CAS to GAAP

A September 2026 Department of War memorandum signed by Deputy Secretary Steve Feinberg directs the agency to move away from government-unique Cost Accounting Standards toward GAAP-based contract pricing.

Reported details remain thin: on September 14, 2026, Deputy Secretary of War Steve Feinberg signed a memorandum titled "Fostering One Strong Industrial Base," directing the Department of War (DoW) to shift away from government-unique Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) and toward generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For contractors, that is not a technicality. CAS governs allowability of direct and indirect costs, overhead allocation and the cost basis used to price proposals; GAAP treats many of those judgments differently. A GAAP-based pricing regime could reshape how future bids are built, require reconciliation of accumulated contract-cost data, change negotiated and ceiling price structures, and alter the accounting basis for revenue recognition on long-term work. Sophisticated counsel should review pending solicitations, existing indefinite-delivery vehicles and teaming arrangements for stranded cost-accounting investments, and weigh whether transition clauses, protests or claims strategies are warranted. What to watch: whether the memo is immediately operative or depen

…

government-contractscost-accounting-standardsgaapdefense-contractingcontract-pricingregulatory-memorandum
Read the full dispatch →
Cozen O'Connor+ Expand
Maryland Court Denies Injunction on Federal Contractor DEI Order

A District of Maryland judge on Oct. 14, 2026 declined to enjoin Executive Order 14398, leaving the Administration's March 2026 federal contractor diversity, equity and inclusion order in force.

According to a single published alert from Cozen O'Connor, on October 14, 2026 the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied a preliminary injunction against Executive Order 14398, the Administration's March 2026 order addressing diversity, equity and inclusion among federal contractors. The practical effect of a denied preliminary injunction is that the order remains operative while the underlying challenge proceeds, so contractors subject to the order's requirements continue to face the compliance obligations it imposes, including whatever flow-down and reporting terms attach to federal procurement work.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: the ruling is a jurisdictional and interim procedural development rather than a merits decision, but it affects the operating posture of every contractor and subcontractor that relies on federal work. It also signals the near-term trajectory of a challenge that may produce appellate review of a contested executive-branch procurement directive.

…

executive-order-14398federal-contractor-deipreliminary-injunctiongovernment-contractsdistrict-of-marylanddei-compliance
Read the full dispatch →
05 — PRIVACY / DATA SECURITY1
Perkins Coie+ Expand
Judge largely denies Apple summary judgment in BIPA biometric class action

Chief Judge Rosenstengel's ruling in Doe v. Apple (S.D. Ill.) keeps alive the Illinois BIPA class action over the Photos app's use of facial recognition, with implications for biometric-data litigation generally.

A federal judge in the Southern District of Illinois has largely denied summary judgment to Apple Inc. in Doe v. Apple Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00421-NJR, the long-running putative class action under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act that concerns the company's Photos app and the facial-recognition and related biometric processing it performs on users' images. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel issued the ruling.

The significance for major-firm clients is the continued viability of BIPA class actions targeting the collection, scanning, and retention of facial data embedded in consumer applications, and the court's treatment of what constitutes a biometric identifier and of a user's "control" over it. Counsel representing consumer-technology, social-media, and device clients should expect the decision to be examined in related actions and in class-certification and damages phases of similar suits, and should assess whether consent, retention, and disclosure practices withstand a summary-judgment challenge on comparable facts.

…

applebipabiometricsfacial-recognitionprivacy-class-actionillinoissummary-judgment
Read the full dispatch →
06 — REGULATORY / GOVERNMENT1
Steptoe+ Expand
FCC Clears Further Covered List Conditional Approvals for US Sales

The FCC's latest conditional approvals give previously restricted equipment makers a conditional path back into the US market, raising diligence questions for hardware, telecom and security-sensitive clients.

What happened: the FCC has announced further conditional approvals under its Covered List framework, which Steptoe characterises as providing a path to US market access for affected communications equipment. The Covered List blocks the marketing, sale and import of equipment from named entities, and conditional approvals permit specified equipment to re-enter the US market subject to conditions rather than an outright ban. The available extract is a single firm alert and does not identify which vendors or equipment categories were approved, or the conditions imposed, so scope should be checked against the FCC orders.

Why counsel should care: the change reaches beyond one sector. Supply chains, carriers, federal contractors and security-sensitive buyers all screen hardware against the list, and it is enforced at equipment authorisation and import. A shift in access status can affect supplier qualification, installed base, support obligations and contractual provenance warranties.

…

fcc-covered-listequipment-authorizationsecure-equipment-actus-market-accesstelecom-supply-chainnational-securityconditional-approval
Read the full dispatch →
07 — SANCTIONS / EXPORT CONTROLS4
Hogan Lovells+ Expand
China Proposes New Export Controls on AI, Biotech and Solar Technology

MOFCOM and MOST jointly floated an October 16, 2026 expansion of China's export control regime covering AI, life sciences and photovoltaic technologies, with licensing and scope details still unconfirmed.

China's Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Science and Technology jointly issued a proposal on October 16, 2026 to expand the country's technology export control regime to cover AI, life sciences and photovoltaic technologies, according to Hogan Lovells. The measure appears to be a draft open for comment rather than a final rule, and the source excerpt does not specify the controlled items, licensing thresholds, effective date or comment period; those details should be verified against the Chinese-language texts before any advice is given.

The development matters for major-firm clients well beyond China. AI compute and semiconductor supply chains, biologics and laboratory-equipment exporters, and solar manufacturing participants all face the risk of tighter control categories, licensing, end-user and end-use screening for cross-border shipments, technology transfers and licensing arrangements with Chinese entities — and of parallel restrictions elsewhere, including outbound investment and export control responses by the EU, UK and US.

…

export-controlschinaai-computelife-sciencesphotovoltaicmofcomsupply-chain
Read the full dispatch →
Ropes & Gray+ Expand
China Proposes Export Restrictions on Advanced Biopharmaceutical Technology

China's MOFCOM and MOST issued Announcement No. 48 of 2026 proposing new export controls on advanced biopharmaceutical technology, with immediate registration requirements affecting cross-border life sciences deals.

On October 16, 2026, China's Ministry of Commerce and Ministry of Science and Technology jointly issued Announcement No. 48 of 2026, a proposal adding new export restrictions on certain advanced biopharmaceutical technologies and imposing immediate registration requirements for transfers of the covered technology. The measure is at the proposal stage, and the specific technology catalogue, licensing pathways, and mechanics of the registration regime are not set out in the material reviewed here; counsel should confirm scope against the official text and any comment or implementation timetable before advising clients.

…

china-export-controlsbiopharmaceutical-technologydual-use-technologylife-sciences-licensingcross-border-investmentmofcom
Read the full dispatch →
Holland & Knight+ Expand
Graham Act Codifies Russia Sanctions; Presidential Waiver Defers Most Risk

A new U.S. statute pulls much of the Russia sanctions program out of executive orders and into law, but a presidential waiver defers most of the resulting client exposure.

The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (P.L. 119-111), signed into law on September 18, 2026, seeks to codify the existing executive order-based Russia sanctions program — a structural shift for compliance teams that have long tracked OFAC's evolving directives. Per a Holland & Knight analysis published October 23, 2026, however, a presidential waiver defers most of the practical exposure the statute creates, making near-term risk largely prospective rather than immediate.

…

russia-sanctionsofacsanctions-codificationpresidential-waiverexport-controlscompliance-risk
Read the full dispatch →
Ballard Spahr+ Expand
OFAC and FinCEN Sanction 'A7 Network' as Global Sanctions-Evasion Infrastructure

Treasury's OFAC and FinCEN took joint action on October 1 against the A7 Network, described as global financial services infrastructure built to evade Iran- and Russia-linked sanctions.

On October 1, the US Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took joint action designating the "A7 Network," which the government describes as a global financial services infrastructure designed to evade sanctions, in connection with Iranian finance and Russia-linked sanctions evasion. The source is a single law-firm alert summarizing the action rather than the underlying Treasury materials, so the specific designated persons, entities, and legal authorities are not detailed here; counsel should read the primary OFAC and FinCEN releases for operative details.

…

ofacfincensanctions-evasioniranrussiafinancial-crimesasset-freezes
Read the full dispatch →
08 — WHITE COLLAR / INVESTIGATIONS2
Husch Blackwell+ Expand
DOJ Launches WHIP, Paying Up-Front Awards for Fraud Tips

DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division announced WHIP on October 20, 2026, billed as the first federal whistleblower program paying an up-front award for tips, with award sizes and covered fraud matters still to come.

On October 20, 2026, DOJ and its National Fraud Enforcement Division announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), which DOJ characterizes as the first federal whistleblower program to pay an up-front award for tips rather than only a share of a later prosecution or settlement. The launch introduces a new financial pull for informants in fraud matters, affecting the reporting calculus for employees, counterparties and internal whistleblowers weighing whether to come forward.

The available source describes the program at announcement level only and does not set out which fraud matters qualify, how claims are scored, the size of up-front awards, or how WHIP interacts with existing SEC, CFTC and False Claims Act recovery mechanisms. Program terms, eligibility criteria and implementing guidance are the developments to watch.

…

doj-whistleblower-incentivesfraud-enforcementup-front-awardswhite-collar-investigationsnfedinternal-escalation
Read the full dispatch →
Holland & Knight+ Expand
DOJ Opens First-Ever Up-Front Whistleblower Rewards for Fraud Tips

DOJ's new Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program pays an up-front award for information leading to criminal fraud charges, adding a payment-at-charge incentive to corporate fraud investigations.

On October 20, 2026, DOJ announced the Fraud Whistleblower Incentive Program (WHIP), which the Department describes as the first whistleblower rewards program paying an up-front award for information leading to criminal charges rather than for later conviction or settlement outcomes. Holland & Knight's report does not set out award amounts, eligibility criteria, funding, or how WHIP interacts with DOJ's existing corporate misconduct award program.

The reason sophisticated counsel should care is that a cash reward keyed to the filing of criminal charges changes the informant calculus for corporate fraud targets. Clients with fraud exposure should expect more tip-driven charging decisions and a premium on fast internal investigation and voluntary disclosure; defense teams should consider how award letters, informant identity, and award timing bear on privilege, spoliation, and internal reporting governance.

…

doj-whistleblowerwhistleblower-rewardsfraud-enforcementwhite-collar-investigationsinformant-tipscorporate-compliance
Read the full dispatch →
Also noted

Grade 3 — worth a glance, not the full analysis.

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

Each weekday's issue by email, through Substack. Or follow the RSS feed.