Akin Gump·LITIGATION / APPELLATE

Analysis Outlines Proposed Pathways for ICSID ISDS Appellate Review

In-house counsel for multinational corporations with cross-border investments must monitor this proposed reform, as it could reshape the investor-state dispute resolution framework and alter enforcement risks for overseas investments.

Co-authors of a recent Corporate Disputes article analyze the ICSID Secretariat’s proposed “inter se” modification pathway to introduce appellate review of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) awards, currently prohibited under the ICSID Convention. The piece breaks down the proposed opt-in treaty mechanism, its interaction with existing annulment procedures, and enforcement implications for both participating and non-participating states. Building on the authors’ prior analysis of UNCITRAL Working Group III ISDS reform proposals, the article notes the reform requires careful legal calibration to avoid disrupting the existing integrated treaty system.

international-arbitrationicsid-reformisdsappellate-reviewinvestor-state-disputes
Read the original firm alert →Thursday, July 9, 2026

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

One email when the daily AmLaw 100 briefing ships. No noise, no pitch decks — just the grade 4–5 signal.