Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom·SECURITIES / CAPITAL MARKETS

SEC 'Hands-Off' Policy Shifts Shareholder Proposal Risks

The SEC staff's decision to no longer review the merits of a company's reasons for excluding shareholder proposals creates a new calculus of litigation and reputational risks for the upcoming proxy season.

The SEC staff has made permanent its "hands-off" policy of no longer reviewing the substantive merits of a public company's decision to exclude a shareholder proposal under Rule 14a-8. This change, implemented for the 2026 proxy season, removes the agency as an informal arbiter, a role that historically lent legitimacy to company exclusions and discouraged litigation. Now, companies face a new landscape where excluding a proposal carries a greater risk of a court challenge. The first proxy season under the new policy saw six lawsuits filed over roughly 170 exclusions. Sophisticated counsel must advise clients to re-evaluate their proxy-season strategy. The decision to exclude now involves a more complex calculus, weighing the heightened risk of litigation, the possibility of proponents using advance notice bylaws to circumvent Rule 14a-8, and potential reputational damage or investor pushback against directors. While direct investor backlash was limited in 2026, providing a clear, well-supported rationale for any exclusion is more critical than ever as companies prepare for the 2027 season.

secshareholder-proposalsrule-14a-8proxy-seasoncorporate-governanceno-action-letterssecurities-regulation
Read the original firm alert → Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

One email when the daily AmLaw 100 briefing ships. No noise, no pitch decks — just the grade 4–5 signal.