Steptoe·ENVIRONMENT / ESG / CLIMATE

Federal Court Upholds Oregon Packaging EPR Law

A federal court rejected a challenge to Oregon's extended producer responsibility law for packaging, signaling that similar state-level product stewardship regulations may withstand legal scrutiny.

A federal court upheld Oregon’s extended producer responsibility (EPR) law for consumer packaging, dismissing the lawsuit in NAW v. Feldon that challenged its validity. This decision marks a significant milestone for US environmental regulation, as Oregon is one of several states that have recently enacted sweeping laws requiring producers of packaged goods to finance and manage the collection and recycling of their materials. Such EPR schemes are designed to shift the financial burden of waste management from municipalities to the private sector and encourage more sustainable packaging design.

For corporate counsel, this ruling strengthens the legal foundation for similar EPR laws in other states, including California, Colorado, and Maine. It suggests that constitutional challenges may face an uphill battle. Companies in the consumer goods, retail, and manufacturing sectors should anticipate an expanding patchwork of state-level EPR obligations, which will necessitate significant changes to supply chain management, product design, and compliance budgets. The key development to watch is whether the plaintiffs appeal the decision.

eprextended-producer-responsibilityoregonenvironmental-regulationproduct-stewardshiprecycling
Read the original firm alert → Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

One email when the daily AmLaw 100 briefing ships. No noise, no pitch decks — just the grade 4–5 signal.