Faegre DrinkerยทCONSUMER PROTECTION

EU Product Liability Directive recasts recoverable damages for manufacturers

Faegre Drinker's dissection of the new EU Product Liability Directive explains how member-state transposition will codify novel heads of recoverable damages and reshape defect presumptions and disclosure duties.

Faegre Drinker's analysis dissects the EU's new Product Liability Directive (PLD), which updates the Union's 1985 product liability framework and requires each member state to transpose it into national legislation. Because PLD-style regimes operate on strict-liability principles, the practical consequence is that the substance of claims, the allocation of proof and the value of damages all change, not merely the labels used.

The alert's centre of gravity is the PLD's codification of novel categories of recoverable damages. The source's own framing is that the directive adds novel heads of loss; the specific reported categories include medical costs, loss of enjoyment, and losses tied to destroyed or corrupted data. That expansion is directly relevant to clients selling software, connected devices and AI-enabled products, where the boundary of "product" and the traditional repair-or-replacement measure of loss have long been contested. The PLD also introduces disclosure duties and rebuttable presumptions of defect and causation, which typically shift timing and cost earlier in disputes and raise sensitivity to document preservation.

Action for counsel: confirm, market by market, the status of implementing statutes and transitional provisions, and build a damages matrix covering the newly codified heads of loss before claims are filed. The source does not supply individual member-state deadlines or holdings, so transposition dates should be verified per jurisdiction.

eu-product-liability-directiveproduct-liabilityrecoverable-damagestranspositionsoftware-liabilitypresumption-of-defect

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

Each weekday's issue by email, through Substack. Or follow the RSS feed.