/ Search

Search the archive.

Full-text across every dispatch: headlines, hooks, analysis, keywords, firms, and practice areas.

137 results for “tariffs”
Akin GumpGovernment Contracts / Defense2026-10-06
Trump Memorandum Targets Canadian Goods in Federal Civil Procurement

The September 16 memorandum orders OMB, USTR and the FAR Council to remove or restrict Canadian-origin items from federal civilian procurement — a directive not yet implemented and expressly limited in scope.

A presidential memorandum signed September 16, 2026 extends the administration's September 8 direction to strip Canadian-origin goods from the entire federal civil procurement system, instructing OMB, USTR and the FAR Council to take steps "permitted by applicable law" and notify agencies of domestic alternatives. Nothing is excluded yet: Canadian end products remain eligible until implementing action, and the civilian scope excludes Department of War procurements, which sit under a separate reciprocal defense procurement understanding.

The mechanics are unresolved. The most plausible vehicle is USTR delisting Canada as a Trade Agreements Act designated country, which would bar Canadian end products above TAA thresholds rather than merely trigger a Buy American price penalty, and would require modifications to existing contracts. GSA MAS Refresh 33, pushed from September to October, is the near-term indicator of how aggressive the removal will be.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Morgan, Lewis & BockiusSanctions / Export Controls2026-10-02
Graham Sanctions Act Signed: Statutory Russia/Iran Sanctions, Tariffs Up to 500%

Signed September 18, 2026, the Act makes many Russia sanctions mandatory, adds oligarch, shadow-fleet and messaging-facilitator mandates, authorizes tariffs up to 500% on Russian goods, and extends the Iran Sanctions Act.

President Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 on September 18, 2026, moving much of the US Russia sanctions framework from executive order into statute and making many designations mandatory, with an initial presidential review due within 30 days (on or before October 18, 2026). New mandatory measures cover Russian government-owned or affiliated entities, "oligarchs" who have not opposed the war, transferees of their assets, vessel providers, shadow-fleet owners, insurers, servicers and permissive foreign ports, and messaging entities used to circumvent sanctions. The Act also codifies investment, services and sovereign-debt restrictions, directs the SEC to delist Russian government-affiliated issuers, mandates the Russian uranium import ban and Rosatom leadership sanctions, and extends the Iran Sanctions Act five years.

For counsel, note that pre-enactment general licenses survive (§ 114(h)), but reliance must be tested against each designation authority, and the president retains broad § 115 waiver power on national-interest certification.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Husch BlackwellInternational Trade / Tariffs2026-10-02
U.S. AD/CVD petition filed on Chinese amine compounds

Evonik and Huntsman filed a U.S. petition seeking antidumping and countervailing duties on certain amine compounds from China, alleging dumping margins of 261‑476% and subsidies above de minimis, triggering a 2026 ITC and DOC investigation.

Evonik Corporation and Huntsman International LLC have filed a petition with the U.S. Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission seeking antidumping and countervailing duties on specific amine compounds imported from China. The scope includes defined organic amines used as polyurethane catalysts, identified by CAS numbers and HTSUS subheadings. Petitioners allege dumping margins of 261‑476% and claim Chinese subsidies exceed de minimis levels. The investigation schedule calls for DOC initiation on October 19 2026, ITC preliminary questionnaires by October 13, hearings in late October, and preliminary DOC determinations from December 2026 through March 2027, with final decisions expected by mid-2027. For sophisticated counsel and corporate clients in chemicals, manufacturing, and supply-chain management, the case raises material risk exposure, potential duty liabilities, and compliance deadlines that could reshape import costs. Stakeholders should monitor the scope definition, possible duty rates, and opportunities to submit comments or request hearings. The petition u

…

Read the full dispatch →
Foley & LardnerEnergy / Renewables2026-10-02
California Signs Seven Data Center Bills Effective Jan. 1, 2027

Newsom signed seven data center laws on September 21, 2026, imposing new utility tariff, cost-entitlement and disclosure duties on hyperscalers, developers and power producers ahead of a January 1, 2027 effective date.

On September 21, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven data center bills that primarily take effect on January 1, 2027, according to Foley & Lardner. Reported subject matter spans new tariff provisions, entitlement rules and disclosure obligations, with hyperscale cloud operators, data center developers and electric power producers all implicated.

The significance is structural rather than incremental. Data center load growth is forcing the question of who pays for the generation, transmission and distribution capacity it consumes, and a seven-bill package signals a settled legislative position rather than a single isolated mandate. Rate design, cost allocation and disclosure duties touching hyperscalers will ripple through utility commission proceedings, power purchase agreements, site selection and project financing, and the compliance posture of developers whose economics were underwritten under the prior regime.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Morgan, Lewis & BockiusInternational Trade / Tariffs2026-09-23
FCC Expands Covered List, Blocking More Foreign-Made Tech by Category

New FCC restrictions on broad categories of foreign-produced technology, not just named companies, create urgent supply-chain diligence requirements for US importers and manufacturers.

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is expanding its "Covered List," a key national security tool that blocks market access for communications equipment deemed to pose an unacceptable risk. Recent additions have moved beyond targeting specific companies to banning broad categories of technology—including drones, consumer routers, advanced robotics, and power inverters—based on their country of production. This shift means equipment can be blocked from receiving the FCC authorization required for US importation and sale, regardless of the manufacturer's nationality. The restrictions impact any company with global manufacturing, including US-headquartered firms producing abroad. Furthermore, the FCC is now scrutinizing internal components, demanding unprecedented visibility deep into supply chains. While a "conditional approval" process offers a potential exemption, it requires extensive disclosure of corporate structure and manufacturing details. Companies that import, make, or use connected devices must now urgently assess their supply-chain vulnerabilities as the governme

…

Read the full dispatch →
Holland & KnightInternational Trade / Tariffs2026-09-19
CFIUS 2025 Data Shows Lower Clearance for Short-Form Filings

The latest CFIUS annual report reveals that while short-form 'declaration' filings are increasingly popular, their clearance rate fell to an all-time low of 66% in 2025.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has released its annual report for calendar year 2025, revealing critical trends for cross-border transactions. While total filings increased moderately, the data shows a significant strategic shift for dealmakers. Short-form "declarations" grew in popularity, but their clearance rate dropped to an all-time low of 66%, down from 78% the prior year. Consequently, a higher percentage of parties (26%) who filed declarations were later required to submit a more extensive full "notice," lengthening their review timelines. The report also shows a continued, albeit reduced, use of mitigation agreements and sustained scrutiny of non-notified transactions, with CFIUS requesting filings for nine such deals after identifying them. For deal counsel, the declining success rate of declarations complicates filing strategy, requiring a more nuanced risk assessment between the faster, but increasingly uncertain, short-form process and the more laborious full notice. The data suggests that despite stated policy goals of streamlining alli

…

Read the full dispatch →
Perkins CoieInternational Trade / Tariffs2026-09-18
Resource Nationalism in Africa Threatens Foreign Mining Investments

A growing number of African governments are tightening control over strategic mineral resources through new taxes, local ownership rules, and license revocations, creating significant new risks for foreign investors.

Several African nations, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Zambia, and Ghana, are increasingly asserting sovereign control over their natural resources, particularly minerals critical for the global energy transition. This wave of 'resource nationalism' includes measures such as increasing royalty rates and taxes, mandating higher state or local shareholdings in mining projects, banning the export of unprocessed minerals to force domestic refining, and, in some cases, cancelling licenses and nationalizing assets.

…

Read the full dispatch →
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrInternational Trade / Tariffs2026-09-16
ITC Seeks Input on Reviving Dormant Trade Remedy Power

The US International Trade Commission seeks public comment on how it should identify and report on foreign trade practices that discriminate against US commerce under Section 338 of the Tariff Act, a provision recently used against Canada.

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) has opened a public comment period to guide the revival of its reporting duties under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This follows the executive branch's recent and novel use of Section 338 to impose tariffs and import exclusions on Canadian products, alleging discriminatory trade practices against US alcoholic beverages, dairy, and motor vehicles. The statute empowers the president to retaliate against countries that burden US commerce.

…

Read the full dispatch →
← PrevPage 2 of 7Next →

Stay ahead

Join the digest.

Each weekday's issue by email, through Substack. Or follow the RSS feed.