DROPLETS
California's new COMPETE Act (AB 1776), signed September 30, 2026, significantly expands the state's Cartwright Act, raising antitrust exposure for companies doing business in the country's largest state economy.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776, the COMPETE Act, significantly expanding the Cartwright Act. California now operates one of the broadest antitrust statutes in the country, and the change reaches far beyond in-state counsel: it affects the conduct, litigation posture, and settlement calculus of any company with sales, employees, or operations in California.
Why counsel should care now: expanded state liability interacts with the federal antitrust framework and overlapping private-enforcement regimes, and a stricter state standard can change how defense costs, injunctions, and class exposure are priced in disputes touching the state. For major-firm clients, the question is whether existing pricing, contracting, or distribution practices now carry added state-law risk, and whether pending matters should be reassessed.
…
Two executive orders signed on 29 September 2026 mandate federal use of "Super Intelligence"/"SI" over "AI" and create the SI-enabled America.gov services portal, with a statutory SI definition proposed within 60 days.
On 29 September 2026 the Trump Administration issued two executive orders. The first directs executive departments and agencies, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to substitute "Super Intelligence" (SI) for "artificial intelligence" (AI) in official correspondence, websites, reports and policy documents, reasoning that frontier systems have outrun the original terminology. Existing regulations, contracts and grants need not be revised, and "SI" currently covers the same technologies as the statutory AI definition at 15 U.S.C. § 9401(3) — but the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology must propose legislative language on an SI definition within 60 days, including whether it modifies or supersedes that definition.
The second order establishes America.gov, a conversational federal services portal administered by GSA with OMB and the National Design Studio, integrating Login.gov and covering public-facing services with more than 100,000 annual users. OMB may add or remove covered services by memorandum, and an implementation memorandum is due within 90 days.
…
The Third Circuit affirmed the fair use ruling against Ross Intelligence but applied a "strict necessity" standard, diverging from Judge Alsup's "reasonably necessary" reasoning in Bartz v. Anthropic and setting up a possible circuit split.
The Third Circuit has affirmed the February 2025 summary judgment opinion in Thomson Reuters v. Ross, adopting parts of Judge Bibas's analysis while rejecting others. Because ROSS's tool was a legal search engine returning judicial opinion passages rather than a generative model, the panel expressly distinguished LLM training and dismissed the DOJ's competition concerns raised in the OpenAI copyright litigation. That narrow framing, however, masks reasoning that travels: the court treated competitive overlap with the copyrighted work as evidence of minimal transformation, and it converted the factual backdrop of intermediate-copying cases into a rule that copying must be necessary rather than merely easy, holding that ROSS could not claim headnotes to reach unprotected information because vendor drafting was the simpler path.
…
The SEC's Chief Accountant and Investment Management staff issued a joint statement on fair value measurement and disclosure for private credit, a signal that scrutiny of illiquid asset valuations is intensifying.
Two SEC staff offices — the Office of the Chief Accountant and the Division of Investment Management — have jointly issued a statement on fair value measurement and disclosure considerations for private credit. The message to sponsors, advisers, valuation agents, auditors and fund boards is that a rapid build-out of privately placed loans, direct lending and related exposure has outpaced the consistency of pricing and disclosure practices supporting reported net asset value.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: private credit is now a core allocation for insurance, pension, sovereign wealth and hedge fund clients, and much of that paper sits on registered fund balance sheets. Risk is migrating from portfolio holdings to the valuation and disclosure apparatus around them. A staff statement changes no legal obligation, but it signals where examiners and enforcement attention is heading, and is a natural reference point in diligence on valuation policy, pricing sources, Level 3 governance, and board oversight.
…
The General Counsel's brief in Atlassian Corp. seeks to replace the 2023 Stericycle presumption of unlawful work rules with a contextual two-step balancing test, days after the Board vacated Lion Elastomers II and restored Wright Line.
Two developments point in the same direction for employer-side labor counsel. First, the General Counsel's September 11, 2026 brief in Atlassian Corp. (16-CA-324971) asks the Board to abandon the 2023 Stericycle presumption — that a rule with a reasonable tendency to chill Section 7 activity is presumptively unlawful unless the employer proves a legitimate interest and no narrower alternative — and to substitute a two-step test: whether an "objectively reasonable employee," reading the rule in context, would see possible interference, followed by genuine balancing of the employer's legitimate business justifications against the degree of interference. Applied to the four rules litigated in Atlassian, the GC would uphold civility, anti-insult, and stakeholder-communication rules, and invalidate only the confidentiality rule to the extent it captured nonpublic compensation information.
…
Bipartisan Senate committee leaders released text of a 2026 affordability and jobs bill pairing NEPA and Clean Water Act permitting reforms, signaling cross-client consequences for energy, infrastructure and industrial permitting.
Senate committee leaders from both parties introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 on 30 September 2026, releasing legislative text that combines reforms to the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act alongside other permitting provisions. The early, jointly-sponsored introduction matters because permitting timelines and environmental review are recurring gating items for data centers, transmission and generation buildout, water infrastructure, and industrial and manufacturing siting.
For major-firm clients, the key question is not the bill number but which review pathways, page limits, categorical exclusions, jurisdictional triggers, and judicial-review provisions survive negotiation. Drafts of this kind typically change several times before any floor vote, and House counterparts may substitute or dilute the Senate text. Counsel should therefore treat the release as a starting marker for scenario planning rather than settled law, and should stress-test project schedules against alternative review regimes that could still apply.
…
California's new law removes the private right of action under CIPA's pen register and trap-and-trace provision, reshaping wiretap-based class action exposure for California-facing clients.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 690, the culmination of a multi-year effort to curb abusive CIPA litigation. The measure ends the private right of action under the California Invasion of Privacy Act's pen register and trap-and-trace provision — the statute California plaintiffs' bars have used to build wiretap-based class actions, often with per-transmission statutory damages and discovery-expanding allegations.
The reported significance is a narrowing of one of the highest-volume state privacy claim categories for consumer-facing businesses, including platforms, app operators, retailers and financial institutions with California users. Defense-side counsel should expect dismissals and class action challenges citing the new law, while plaintiffs' firms will test its retroactivity and its treatment of conduct predating September 30, 2026. Corporate counsel should reassess exposure reserves for pending and threatened CIPA wiretap matters and calibrate future monitoring and consent practices.
…
Newsom signed AB 1776 on September 30, 2026, giving California authority over unilateral conduct, breaking with the federal monopoly-maintenance standard. Dominant firms now face a state-only exposure track.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 1776, the Competition and Opportunity in Markets for a Prosperous, Equitable and Transparent Economy Act, the latest amendment to the state's antitrust statute. According to Wilson Sonsini's summary, the law extends California's competition law to reach single-firm conduct — categories historically governed almost exclusively by federal antitrust law under the monopoly-maintenance framework, which requires proving that market power was acquired or maintained through exclusionary conduct.
…
The SEC voted at a September 30, 2026 open meeting to advance three proposed rulemakings under Chairman Atkins' "responsible retailization" agenda aimed at expanding retail investor access to private markets.
At its September 30, 2026 open meeting, the SEC voted to advance three proposed rulemakings under Chairman Atkins' "responsible retailization" initiative, framed as broadening individual investor access to private markets. Only one source is in this cluster, and the available text does not identify the specific proposals, their proposed eligibility standards, or any comment deadlines, so the substance of the package is not verifiable from the excerpt. Read the adopted releases and proposing releases for the full text of each item.
…
After Trump v. Slaughter, a 1-1 Ferguson-Meador split left the FTC unable to block or condition IonQ's SkyWater deal, and the commissioners' September 2026 remarks signal divergent enforcement paths.
The Supreme Court's June 2026 decision in Trump v. Slaughter upheld the removal of two Democratic commissioners, confirming presidential power to remove FTC leadership at will. A third Republican commissioner resigned in November 2025, and nominee David MacNeil remained unconfirmed as of September 2026, leaving Chair Andrew Ferguson and Commissioner Mark Meador as the agency's only sitting members.
In July 2026 they split 1-1 on IonQ's acquisition of quantum chip fabricator SkyWater. Ferguson backed a staff-negotiated consent order with behavioral remedies citing US leadership in fault-tolerant quantum computing; Meador called the risk too "narrow, too short-lived, and too speculative" and pointed to 2023 Merger Guidelines market shares. With a tie and no appetite to sue, the deal closed unconditionally — a template for future tied votes.
…
The SEC's proposal would let registered retail funds charge performance fees and give interval funds more operational latitude, reshaping private-market access, adviser economics and product structuring.
What happened: the SEC has proposed amendments designed to expand retail investor access to private-market strategies through registered funds. The proposal addresses two levers: permitting performance fees for funds organized under the Investment Company Act rather than limiting them to incentive-based fee structures, and easing operational constraints that currently govern interval funds, which invest a stated share of assets in illiquid holdings. The single source in the cluster is a law-firm client alert analyzing the proposal; the comment record and any final rule text are not reflected in the available material.
…
Perkins Coie reports the SEC announced on September 17, 2026 a five-year 'Innovation Exemption' to facilitate trading of tokenized versions of stocks listed on major U.S. exchanges; the operative terms are not set out in the source.
On September 17, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a five-year "Innovation Exemption" intended to facilitate trading of tokenized versions of stocks listed on major U.S. stock exchanges and markets, according to a Perkins Coie client alert. The excerpt available here does not set out the exemption's operative terms — eligible token structures, permitted intermediaries, custody and settlement arrangements, or disclosure and listing conditions — so its actual scope should be read from the SEC's own materials before being relied on.
…
Governor Newsom signed AB 1776 (COMPETE Act) on September 30, 2026, broadening California's Cartwright Act monopoly enforcement framework ahead of a January 1, 2027 effective date.
Per a single Latham & Watkins alert (JD Supra, October 1, 2026; the excerpt is truncated, so provision-level detail is unverified), California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776 — the COMPETE Act — on September 30, 2026. The statute reportedly materially expands the state's principal antitrust statute, the Cartwright Act, and its monopoly-enforcement reach, with an effective date of January 1, 2027.
For major-firm clients, the significance is that a state already central to nationwide merger review now appears to have a broader in-state toolkit for challenging single-firm conduct, potentially raising parallel exposure alongside federal antitrust claims and letting plaintiffs reframe monopolization theories around California market structure. Practical attention should shift to California-facing distribution, platform, and network-effect businesses, and to counsel weighing how state theories interact with Hart-Scott-Rodino timing and the federal monopoly elements.
…
A September 29 meeting between the President and leading AI developers produced a non-binding "White House Accord on Super Intelligence" on independent model audits, putting audit-ready governance on the near-term agenda.
On September 29, 2026, the President met at the White House with executives from several leading AI developers, and the parties announced a voluntary framework — the "White House Accord on Super Intelligence" — centered on commitments regarding independent AI audits.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: a voluntary federal instrument aimed at frontier-model developers is a signal, not a rule, but commitments of this kind can migrate into hard requirements. Audit language of this sort tends to resurface in procurement clauses, in state AI statutes and their implementation paths, and in enterprise customer diligence, where a counterparty's willingness to submit to third-party model evaluation becomes a contract term. For major-firm clients on both sides of the transaction — labs raising capital, deployers, and vendors — the operative questions are who signed, what "independent audit" is defined to mean (evaluation methodology, access to weights and training data, disclosure of findings), whether findings are public, and what consequences attach to a missed commitment. None of that d
…
The Justice Department's September 18, 2026 revisions to two Justice Manual sections on sub-regulatory guidance and qui tam dismissals signal a changed posture for False Claims Act enforcement and defense.
On September 18, 2026, the Department of Justice announced two revisions to the Justice Manual that, per a law-firm alert, materially affect False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement and defense strategy: one addressing sub-regulatory guidance and the other addressing qui tam dismissals. The excerpt available here does not reproduce the text of the revisions, so the specific new standards, thresholds or procedural rules they impose cannot be characterized from this source alone.
Why it matters: the FCA remains one of the most consequential federal exposure channels for healthcare providers, pharma and device manufacturers, government contractors, and financial-services firms handling federal funds. Changes to how DOJ treats agency sub-regulatory materials, and to the department's handling of relator dismissal requests, bear directly on the strength and litigation posture of FCA claims — and on the settlement leverage of both claimants and respondents. Reported by a single firm alert so far, which suggests early-stage diffusion.
…
SB 1000 significantly reshapes California's framework for labeling and verifying AI-generated content weeks after the California AI Transparency Act took effect, forcing platforms and advertisers to re-map compliance.
California has enacted SB 1000, which according to the reported summary substantially rewrites the state's recently operative AI transparency regime for identifying and verifying AI-generated content. The change lands only weeks after the California AI Transparency Act (CATA), enacted in 2024 via SB 942, took effect — a compressed sequence in which the state's disclosure, provenance and labeling obligations have been adjusted before regulators and industry have settled.
…
A bipartisan Senate bill introduced September 30, 2026 would add NEPA decision deadlines, FERC project exclusions, 150-day suit limits and new remedies against agencies that revoke or delay permits.
According to Vinson & Elkins, the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026, introduced September 30, 2026 by a bipartisan group of senators, is a sweeping federal permit reform package. It would add hard agency deadlines (seven days after an environmental assessment, 45 days after a final EIS, and 90- or 120-day clocks for participating and non-participating agencies), exempt many in-right-of-way interstate gas pipeline and electric transmission activities from NEPA and NHPA review, and narrow Clean Water Act Section 401 certification to direct discharges, with nine-month state deadlines for FERC pipelines and certain lines. It also sets a 150-day statute of limitations for environmental suits, funnels most NEPA, ESA and NHPA claims to the courts of appeals, and makes remand without vacatur the default remedy. Notably for developers, the bill would bar adverse post-permit actions against fully permitted non-federal projects and create government-paid remedies, including 25-50 percent of project costs to date, if the government loses such a suit. Energy clients should ca
…
The SEC's September 30 package of two rule proposals and five notices would add new ways to qualify as an accredited investor and loosen access to private funds, reshaping distribution channels for asset managers.
On September 30, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued two rule proposals and five notices framed as "responsible retailization" — a set of measures intended to widen individual investors' access to private markets. The package would, among other things, create additional routes to accredited investor status, and pair those eligibility changes with potential reforms to how registered funds may offer exposure to private assets.
…
A split Washington Supreme Court ruling on September 17, 2026 voided 2024's Initiative 2066, the voter measure meant to preserve natural gas use, sharpening questions on state limits on local climate and electrification policy.
On September 17, 2026, the Washington Supreme Court issued a split decision in Climate Solutions v. State of Washington striking down Initiative 2066, a 2024 voter-approved measure designed to preserve the use of natural gas in Washington. The available reporting does not set out the full reasoning, the precise statutory basis, or the scope of any remedy, so the holding's contours should be confirmed against the slip opinion before it is relied on.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: an initiative enacted by direct popular vote — a mechanism Washington uses unusually often — has now been invalidated by the state's highest court. Whatever the doctrinal route, the decision will be read widely by utilities, municipal governments and clean-energy developers as a data point on how far Washington will allow statewide limits to constrain or displace local climate, building-electrification and gas-consumption policy. It also lands in a period of active state-level preemption litigation, where comparable initiatives are being contested elsewhere.
…
Governor Newsom has signed SB 947, barring employers from relying solely on automated decision systems in discipline and termination decisions and imposing notice, human-corroboration and data-disclosure duties from July 1, 2027.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed SB 947, reported as the "No Robo Bosses Act," amending the Labor Code to regulate employer use of automated decision systems (ADS): computational processes drawn from machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics or AI that output scores, classifications or recommendations affecting individuals. Spam filters, firewalls, antivirus tools, calculators and databases are excluded, but vendor screening and analytics tools feeding performance management or exit decisions are likely in scope.
…
WilmerHale reports that on September 1, 2026 the SEC proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the rules governing registered transfer agents, a rulemaking that touches securities infrastructure and, on the firm's reading, onchain recordkeeping.
On September 1, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the regulatory framework for registered transfer agents, according to a Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr client alert published on JD Supra. The single source in this cluster describes the proposal and flags implications for onchain recordkeeping; the release as reported does not set out the rule text, the comment deadline, or which specific registration, books-and-records, or settlement provisions would change, so those details should be confirmed against the Federal Register notice and the SEC's own releases before any client reliance.
…
A New York Supreme Court judge cancelled all of the city's roughly 17,000 mailed pied-à-terre tax notices, but the underlying statutory tax and its September 30 effective date were not addressed.
On September 29, 2026, a New York Supreme Court judge issued an order cancelling all of New York City’s approximately 17,000 previously mailed notices concerning the pied-à-terre tax, which had informed property owners of their subjection to the levy. The decision addresses the procedural posture of the mailing campaign, not the underlying statute, and the city's implementation steps remain uncertain.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: the tax falls on residential units in multifamily buildings whose primary residence is an apartment of less than 1,000 square feet. Unit owners, including institutional landlords, sponsors, cooperatives and condominium boards, have been modelling pass-through costs, capital expenditure decisions and rent structures against the levy. Tens of thousands of affected units make this a cross-client issue for real estate and tax practices, and an unclear outcome invites contested assessments, refund claims and potentially significant litigation.
…
A California federal court barred USCIS, CBP and State from implementing the proclamation-based $100,000 H-1B payment pending APA rulemaking compliance — a second injunction, after a Massachusetts ruling now on appeal.
On September 30, 2026, a federal district court in California enjoined USCIS, Customs and Border Protection and the State Department from enforcing or implementing any policy tied to the $100,000 H-1B payment created by Presidential Proclamation 10973 and extended through September 2027 by Proclamation 11069, until the agencies satisfy Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking obligations. The order issued in Global Nurse Force v. Trump, a coalition challenge brought by employers, unions, schools, healthcare providers and religious organizations.
The ruling is the second district-court setback for the fee: a separate Massachusetts decision already enjoined it and is under appeal in the First Circuit. For employers, the practical effect is that no $100,000 payment is presently required for H-1B petitions, including cases needing consular processing or port-of-entry admission. The source notes USCIS has signalled it intends to collect the payment if the injunction is later lifted, so budget and fee-reimbursement modelling may need revisiting.
…
Notice 2026-62 and Rev. Rul. 2026-20, issued September 28, 2026, target fast-growing fund structures, and the revenue ruling applies at once, so fund counsel and LP clients should check existing positions now.
On September 28, 2026, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2026-62 and Rev. Rul. 2026-20, focusing on a set of investment fund tax strategies that have grown quickly in recent years. According to the Venable summary, the revenue ruling reaches transactions immediately rather than applying only prospectively, a point that matters for clients already holding positions entered into under the older treatment.
Why sophisticated counsel cares: a revenue rule that lands with immediate effect can narrow or eliminate a position that funds, family offices, and institutional LPs treated as settled, and it may cut across structures rather than address a single transaction type. Advisers should expect questions about effective-date mechanics, grandfathering, and any administrative or legislative relief, none of which is confirmed in the available reporting.
…
California's new COMPETE Act extends the Cartwright Act to unilateral conduct, giving the state attorney general and private plaintiffs a new theory of liability in a state seen as a national antitrust testing ground.
On September 30, 2026, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776, the COMPETE Act, which California practitioners describe as extending the Cartwright Act to reach single-firm conduct. The significance is not cosmetic. California is the most active state venue for antitrust enforcement and private suits, and the attorney general has repeatedly used it to press theories federal law — notably Sherman Act Section 2 — has not embraced or has narrowed. A statutory route to liability for unilateral conduct would let plaintiffs and the AG proceed without proving a relevant market, monopoly power, or exclusionary agreements, lowering the burden in a state where such suits are already frequent.
Exposure is direct and derivative. Companies already defending California claims face an additional or alternative cause of action, and out-of-state companies face new venue risk in a plaintiff-friendly forum. Conduct lawful federally can still draw scrutiny under a broader state standard, complicating national and global settlement strategy.
…
Codoni v. Port of Seattle (No. 25-2830) resolves the scope of Clean Air Act Section 233 preemption for large airports, sharpening the boundary between state and local air-quality authority and federal air transport regulation.
On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Codoni v. Port of Seattle, No. 25-2830, and Alaska Airlines prevailed on federal preemption. The case addresses how far Section 233 of the Clean Air Act — the federal regime governing emissions from aircraft and airport ground operations at "major" airports — displaces state and local regulation. The available source does not set out the panel's reasoning or precise disposition, so the boundaries of the holding should be confirmed against the opinion.
…
Governor Newsom has signed SB 690, stripping California Penal Code Section 638.51 of its private right of action and materially reducing class-action exposure for telecom, technology and platform clients.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed Senate Bill 690, eliminating the private right of action for claims arising under California Penal Code Section 638.51, the state wiretap provision barring installation and use of "pen registers" and "trap and trace" devices without prior judicial approval. The change converts what had been a private-enforcement hook, and a recurring source of putative class actions, into a matter left to government enforcement, according to the reporting.
…
On October 1, 2026, DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a new directive on corporate enforcement in fraud cases, signaling how the division intends to prioritize and structure corporate fraud prosecutions and resolutions.
On October 1, 2026, Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald issued Directive 26-12, titled "Corporate Enforcement in the Fight Against Fraud," for the Department of Justice's National Fraud Enforcement Division. Reporting comes from a single law-firm alert, and the specific provisions of the memorandum — its charging, declination, cooperation, or resolution criteria — are not set out in the available material; the directive text should be read in full before any conclusions are drawn about its content or practical effect.
Even with details unconfirmed, a division-wide enforcement directive from the National Fraud Enforcement Division touches the calculus for every major-firm corporate client: how internal investigations are scoped, what preservation and cooperation posture is expected, and when resolution is realistically available. A stated corporate-enforcement framework also typically signals a shift in the division's internal triage and charging decisions, which can matter for parallel regulatory and private exposure.
…
Effective January 1, 2027, and with a two-year look-back to suits already filed, SB 690 leaves only the California Attorney General able to sue over alleged CIPA pen-register or trap-and-trace violations arising on websites and apps.
California has enacted SB 690, amending the California Invasion of Privacy Act (Cal. Penal Code § 638.51) to remove the private right of action for the law's "pen register" and "trap and trace device" provisions where the alleged violation arises from conduct on an internet website, online application, or mobile application; only the California Attorney General may bring civil-remedy actions in that category. The statute takes effect January 1, 2027 and, per the source, applies to claims in actions commenced during the two years before that operative date.
Why it matters: CIPA's $5,000-per-violation or triple-actual-damages remedy has driven a volume of class-action and prelitigation demands against companies deploying cookies, pixels, session-replay tools, and analytics tags — technology the statute's 1967-era language never contemplated. Sophisticated counsel should read SB 690 as a targeted channel provision, not a safe harbour.
…
California's new COMPETE Act (AB 1776), signed September 30, 2026, significantly expands the state's Cartwright Act, raising antitrust exposure for companies doing business in the country's largest state economy.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776, the COMPETE Act, significantly expanding the Cartwright Act. California now operates one of the broadest antitrust statutes in the country, and the change reaches far beyond in-state counsel: it affects the conduct, litigation posture, and settlement calculus of any company with sales, employees, or operations in California.
Why counsel should care now: expanded state liability interacts with the federal antitrust framework and overlapping private-enforcement regimes, and a stricter state standard can change how defense costs, injunctions, and class exposure are priced in disputes touching the state. For major-firm clients, the question is whether existing pricing, contracting, or distribution practices now carry added state-law risk, and whether pending matters should be reassessed.
…
California's new COMPETE Act (AB 1776), signed September 30, 2026, significantly expands the state's Cartwright Act, raising antitrust exposure for companies doing business in the country's largest state economy.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776, the COMPETE Act, significantly expanding the Cartwright Act. California now operates one of the broadest antitrust statutes in the country, and the change reaches far beyond in-state counsel: it affects the conduct, litigation posture, and settlement calculus of any company with sales, employees, or operations in California.
Why counsel should care now: expanded state liability interacts with the federal antitrust framework and overlapping private-enforcement regimes, and a stricter state standard can change how defense costs, injunctions, and class exposure are priced in disputes touching the state. For major-firm clients, the question is whether existing pricing, contracting, or distribution practices now carry added state-law risk, and whether pending matters should be reassessed.
…
Newsom signed AB 1776 on September 30, 2026, giving California authority over unilateral conduct, breaking with the federal monopoly-maintenance standard. Dominant firms now face a state-only exposure track.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 1776, the Competition and Opportunity in Markets for a Prosperous, Equitable and Transparent Economy Act, the latest amendment to the state's antitrust statute. According to Wilson Sonsini's summary, the law extends California's competition law to reach single-firm conduct — categories historically governed almost exclusively by federal antitrust law under the monopoly-maintenance framework, which requires proving that market power was acquired or maintained through exclusionary conduct.
…
After Trump v. Slaughter, a 1-1 Ferguson-Meador split left the FTC unable to block or condition IonQ's SkyWater deal, and the commissioners' September 2026 remarks signal divergent enforcement paths.
The Supreme Court's June 2026 decision in Trump v. Slaughter upheld the removal of two Democratic commissioners, confirming presidential power to remove FTC leadership at will. A third Republican commissioner resigned in November 2025, and nominee David MacNeil remained unconfirmed as of September 2026, leaving Chair Andrew Ferguson and Commissioner Mark Meador as the agency's only sitting members.
In July 2026 they split 1-1 on IonQ's acquisition of quantum chip fabricator SkyWater. Ferguson backed a staff-negotiated consent order with behavioral remedies citing US leadership in fault-tolerant quantum computing; Meador called the risk too "narrow, too short-lived, and too speculative" and pointed to 2023 Merger Guidelines market shares. With a tie and no appetite to sue, the deal closed unconditionally — a template for future tied votes.
…
Governor Newsom signed AB 1776 (COMPETE Act) on September 30, 2026, broadening California's Cartwright Act monopoly enforcement framework ahead of a January 1, 2027 effective date.
Per a single Latham & Watkins alert (JD Supra, October 1, 2026; the excerpt is truncated, so provision-level detail is unverified), California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776 — the COMPETE Act — on September 30, 2026. The statute reportedly materially expands the state's principal antitrust statute, the Cartwright Act, and its monopoly-enforcement reach, with an effective date of January 1, 2027.
For major-firm clients, the significance is that a state already central to nationwide merger review now appears to have a broader in-state toolkit for challenging single-firm conduct, potentially raising parallel exposure alongside federal antitrust claims and letting plaintiffs reframe monopolization theories around California market structure. Practical attention should shift to California-facing distribution, platform, and network-effect businesses, and to counsel weighing how state theories interact with Hart-Scott-Rodino timing and the federal monopoly elements.
…
California's new COMPETE Act extends the Cartwright Act to unilateral conduct, giving the state attorney general and private plaintiffs a new theory of liability in a state seen as a national antitrust testing ground.
On September 30, 2026, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1776, the COMPETE Act, which California practitioners describe as extending the Cartwright Act to reach single-firm conduct. The significance is not cosmetic. California is the most active state venue for antitrust enforcement and private suits, and the attorney general has repeatedly used it to press theories federal law — notably Sherman Act Section 2 — has not embraced or has narrowed. A statutory route to liability for unilateral conduct would let plaintiffs and the AG proceed without proving a relevant market, monopoly power, or exclusionary agreements, lowering the burden in a state where such suits are already frequent.
Exposure is direct and derivative. Companies already defending California claims face an additional or alternative cause of action, and out-of-state companies face new venue risk in a plaintiff-friendly forum. Conduct lawful federally can still draw scrutiny under a broader state standard, complicating national and global settlement strategy.
…
The General Counsel's brief in Atlassian Corp. seeks to replace the 2023 Stericycle presumption of unlawful work rules with a contextual two-step balancing test, days after the Board vacated Lion Elastomers II and restored Wright Line.
Two developments point in the same direction for employer-side labor counsel. First, the General Counsel's September 11, 2026 brief in Atlassian Corp. (16-CA-324971) asks the Board to abandon the 2023 Stericycle presumption — that a rule with a reasonable tendency to chill Section 7 activity is presumptively unlawful unless the employer proves a legitimate interest and no narrower alternative — and to substitute a two-step test: whether an "objectively reasonable employee," reading the rule in context, would see possible interference, followed by genuine balancing of the employer's legitimate business justifications against the degree of interference. Applied to the four rules litigated in Atlassian, the GC would uphold civility, anti-insult, and stakeholder-communication rules, and invalidate only the confidentiality rule to the extent it captured nonpublic compensation information.
…
Governor Newsom has signed SB 947, barring employers from relying solely on automated decision systems in discipline and termination decisions and imposing notice, human-corroboration and data-disclosure duties from July 1, 2027.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed SB 947, reported as the "No Robo Bosses Act," amending the Labor Code to regulate employer use of automated decision systems (ADS): computational processes drawn from machine learning, statistical modeling, data analytics or AI that output scores, classifications or recommendations affecting individuals. Spam filters, firewalls, antivirus tools, calculators and databases are excluded, but vendor screening and analytics tools feeding performance management or exit decisions are likely in scope.
…
A bipartisan Senate bill introduced September 30, 2026 would add NEPA decision deadlines, FERC project exclusions, 150-day suit limits and new remedies against agencies that revoke or delay permits.
According to Vinson & Elkins, the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026, introduced September 30, 2026 by a bipartisan group of senators, is a sweeping federal permit reform package. It would add hard agency deadlines (seven days after an environmental assessment, 45 days after a final EIS, and 90- or 120-day clocks for participating and non-participating agencies), exempt many in-right-of-way interstate gas pipeline and electric transmission activities from NEPA and NHPA review, and narrow Clean Water Act Section 401 certification to direct discharges, with nine-month state deadlines for FERC pipelines and certain lines. It also sets a 150-day statute of limitations for environmental suits, funnels most NEPA, ESA and NHPA claims to the courts of appeals, and makes remand without vacatur the default remedy. Notably for developers, the bill would bar adverse post-permit actions against fully permitted non-federal projects and create government-paid remedies, including 25-50 percent of project costs to date, if the government loses such a suit. Energy clients should ca
…
Bipartisan Senate committee leaders released text of a 2026 affordability and jobs bill pairing NEPA and Clean Water Act permitting reforms, signaling cross-client consequences for energy, infrastructure and industrial permitting.
Senate committee leaders from both parties introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 on 30 September 2026, releasing legislative text that combines reforms to the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act alongside other permitting provisions. The early, jointly-sponsored introduction matters because permitting timelines and environmental review are recurring gating items for data centers, transmission and generation buildout, water infrastructure, and industrial and manufacturing siting.
For major-firm clients, the key question is not the bill number but which review pathways, page limits, categorical exclusions, jurisdictional triggers, and judicial-review provisions survive negotiation. Drafts of this kind typically change several times before any floor vote, and House counterparts may substitute or dilute the Senate text. Counsel should therefore treat the release as a starting marker for scenario planning rather than settled law, and should stress-test project schedules against alternative review regimes that could still apply.
…
A split Washington Supreme Court ruling on September 17, 2026 voided 2024's Initiative 2066, the voter measure meant to preserve natural gas use, sharpening questions on state limits on local climate and electrification policy.
On September 17, 2026, the Washington Supreme Court issued a split decision in Climate Solutions v. State of Washington striking down Initiative 2066, a 2024 voter-approved measure designed to preserve the use of natural gas in Washington. The available reporting does not set out the full reasoning, the precise statutory basis, or the scope of any remedy, so the holding's contours should be confirmed against the slip opinion before it is relied on.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: an initiative enacted by direct popular vote — a mechanism Washington uses unusually often — has now been invalidated by the state's highest court. Whatever the doctrinal route, the decision will be read widely by utilities, municipal governments and clean-energy developers as a data point on how far Washington will allow statewide limits to constrain or displace local climate, building-electrification and gas-consumption policy. It also lands in a period of active state-level preemption litigation, where comparable initiatives are being contested elsewhere.
…
Codoni v. Port of Seattle (No. 25-2830) resolves the scope of Clean Air Act Section 233 preemption for large airports, sharpening the boundary between state and local air-quality authority and federal air transport regulation.
On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Codoni v. Port of Seattle, No. 25-2830, and Alaska Airlines prevailed on federal preemption. The case addresses how far Section 233 of the Clean Air Act — the federal regime governing emissions from aircraft and airport ground operations at "major" airports — displaces state and local regulation. The available source does not set out the panel's reasoning or precise disposition, so the boundaries of the holding should be confirmed against the opinion.
…
The SEC's Chief Accountant and Investment Management staff issued a joint statement on fair value measurement and disclosure for private credit, a signal that scrutiny of illiquid asset valuations is intensifying.
Two SEC staff offices — the Office of the Chief Accountant and the Division of Investment Management — have jointly issued a statement on fair value measurement and disclosure considerations for private credit. The message to sponsors, advisers, valuation agents, auditors and fund boards is that a rapid build-out of privately placed loans, direct lending and related exposure has outpaced the consistency of pricing and disclosure practices supporting reported net asset value.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: private credit is now a core allocation for insurance, pension, sovereign wealth and hedge fund clients, and much of that paper sits on registered fund balance sheets. Risk is migrating from portfolio holdings to the valuation and disclosure apparatus around them. A staff statement changes no legal obligation, but it signals where examiners and enforcement attention is heading, and is a natural reference point in diligence on valuation policy, pricing sources, Level 3 governance, and board oversight.
…
The SEC voted at a September 30, 2026 open meeting to advance three proposed rulemakings under Chairman Atkins' "responsible retailization" agenda aimed at expanding retail investor access to private markets.
At its September 30, 2026 open meeting, the SEC voted to advance three proposed rulemakings under Chairman Atkins' "responsible retailization" initiative, framed as broadening individual investor access to private markets. Only one source is in this cluster, and the available text does not identify the specific proposals, their proposed eligibility standards, or any comment deadlines, so the substance of the package is not verifiable from the excerpt. Read the adopted releases and proposing releases for the full text of each item.
…
A California federal court barred USCIS, CBP and State from implementing the proclamation-based $100,000 H-1B payment pending APA rulemaking compliance — a second injunction, after a Massachusetts ruling now on appeal.
On September 30, 2026, a federal district court in California enjoined USCIS, Customs and Border Protection and the State Department from enforcing or implementing any policy tied to the $100,000 H-1B payment created by Presidential Proclamation 10973 and extended through September 2027 by Proclamation 11069, until the agencies satisfy Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking obligations. The order issued in Global Nurse Force v. Trump, a coalition challenge brought by employers, unions, schools, healthcare providers and religious organizations.
The ruling is the second district-court setback for the fee: a separate Massachusetts decision already enjoined it and is under appeal in the First Circuit. For employers, the practical effect is that no $100,000 payment is presently required for H-1B petitions, including cases needing consular processing or port-of-entry admission. The source notes USCIS has signalled it intends to collect the payment if the injunction is later lifted, so budget and fee-reimbursement modelling may need revisiting.
…
The Third Circuit affirmed the fair use ruling against Ross Intelligence but applied a "strict necessity" standard, diverging from Judge Alsup's "reasonably necessary" reasoning in Bartz v. Anthropic and setting up a possible circuit split.
The Third Circuit has affirmed the February 2025 summary judgment opinion in Thomson Reuters v. Ross, adopting parts of Judge Bibas's analysis while rejecting others. Because ROSS's tool was a legal search engine returning judicial opinion passages rather than a generative model, the panel expressly distinguished LLM training and dismissed the DOJ's competition concerns raised in the OpenAI copyright litigation. That narrow framing, however, masks reasoning that travels: the court treated competitive overlap with the copyrighted work as evidence of minimal transformation, and it converted the factual backdrop of intermediate-copying cases into a rule that copying must be necessary rather than merely easy, holding that ROSS could not claim headnotes to reach unprotected information because vendor drafting was the simpler path.
…
California's new law removes the private right of action under CIPA's pen register and trap-and-trace provision, reshaping wiretap-based class action exposure for California-facing clients.
On September 30, 2026, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 690, the culmination of a multi-year effort to curb abusive CIPA litigation. The measure ends the private right of action under the California Invasion of Privacy Act's pen register and trap-and-trace provision — the statute California plaintiffs' bars have used to build wiretap-based class actions, often with per-transmission statutory damages and discovery-expanding allegations.
The reported significance is a narrowing of one of the highest-volume state privacy claim categories for consumer-facing businesses, including platforms, app operators, retailers and financial institutions with California users. Defense-side counsel should expect dismissals and class action challenges citing the new law, while plaintiffs' firms will test its retroactivity and its treatment of conduct predating September 30, 2026. Corporate counsel should reassess exposure reserves for pending and threatened CIPA wiretap matters and calibrate future monitoring and consent practices.
…
Governor Newsom has signed SB 690, stripping California Penal Code Section 638.51 of its private right of action and materially reducing class-action exposure for telecom, technology and platform clients.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed Senate Bill 690, eliminating the private right of action for claims arising under California Penal Code Section 638.51, the state wiretap provision barring installation and use of "pen registers" and "trap and trace" devices without prior judicial approval. The change converts what had been a private-enforcement hook, and a recurring source of putative class actions, into a matter left to government enforcement, according to the reporting.
…
Effective January 1, 2027, and with a two-year look-back to suits already filed, SB 690 leaves only the California Attorney General able to sue over alleged CIPA pen-register or trap-and-trace violations arising on websites and apps.
California has enacted SB 690, amending the California Invasion of Privacy Act (Cal. Penal Code § 638.51) to remove the private right of action for the law's "pen register" and "trap and trace device" provisions where the alleged violation arises from conduct on an internet website, online application, or mobile application; only the California Attorney General may bring civil-remedy actions in that category. The statute takes effect January 1, 2027 and, per the source, applies to claims in actions commenced during the two years before that operative date.
Why it matters: CIPA's $5,000-per-violation or triple-actual-damages remedy has driven a volume of class-action and prelitigation demands against companies deploying cookies, pixels, session-replay tools, and analytics tags — technology the statute's 1967-era language never contemplated. Sophisticated counsel should read SB 690 as a targeted channel provision, not a safe harbour.
…
A New York Supreme Court judge cancelled all of the city's roughly 17,000 mailed pied-à-terre tax notices, but the underlying statutory tax and its September 30 effective date were not addressed.
On September 29, 2026, a New York Supreme Court judge issued an order cancelling all of New York City’s approximately 17,000 previously mailed notices concerning the pied-à-terre tax, which had informed property owners of their subjection to the levy. The decision addresses the procedural posture of the mailing campaign, not the underlying statute, and the city's implementation steps remain uncertain.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: the tax falls on residential units in multifamily buildings whose primary residence is an apartment of less than 1,000 square feet. Unit owners, including institutional landlords, sponsors, cooperatives and condominium boards, have been modelling pass-through costs, capital expenditure decisions and rent structures against the levy. Tens of thousands of affected units make this a cross-client issue for real estate and tax practices, and an unclear outcome invites contested assessments, refund claims and potentially significant litigation.
…
The SEC's proposal would let registered retail funds charge performance fees and give interval funds more operational latitude, reshaping private-market access, adviser economics and product structuring.
What happened: the SEC has proposed amendments designed to expand retail investor access to private-market strategies through registered funds. The proposal addresses two levers: permitting performance fees for funds organized under the Investment Company Act rather than limiting them to incentive-based fee structures, and easing operational constraints that currently govern interval funds, which invest a stated share of assets in illiquid holdings. The single source in the cluster is a law-firm client alert analyzing the proposal; the comment record and any final rule text are not reflected in the available material.
…
Perkins Coie reports the SEC announced on September 17, 2026 a five-year 'Innovation Exemption' to facilitate trading of tokenized versions of stocks listed on major U.S. exchanges; the operative terms are not set out in the source.
On September 17, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a five-year "Innovation Exemption" intended to facilitate trading of tokenized versions of stocks listed on major U.S. stock exchanges and markets, according to a Perkins Coie client alert. The excerpt available here does not set out the exemption's operative terms — eligible token structures, permitted intermediaries, custody and settlement arrangements, or disclosure and listing conditions — so its actual scope should be read from the SEC's own materials before being relied on.
…
The SEC's September 30 package of two rule proposals and five notices would add new ways to qualify as an accredited investor and loosen access to private funds, reshaping distribution channels for asset managers.
On September 30, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued two rule proposals and five notices framed as "responsible retailization" — a set of measures intended to widen individual investors' access to private markets. The package would, among other things, create additional routes to accredited investor status, and pair those eligibility changes with potential reforms to how registered funds may offer exposure to private assets.
…
WilmerHale reports that on September 1, 2026 the SEC proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the rules governing registered transfer agents, a rulemaking that touches securities infrastructure and, on the firm's reading, onchain recordkeeping.
On September 1, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the regulatory framework for registered transfer agents, according to a Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr client alert published on JD Supra. The single source in this cluster describes the proposal and flags implications for onchain recordkeeping; the release as reported does not set out the rule text, the comment deadline, or which specific registration, books-and-records, or settlement provisions would change, so those details should be confirmed against the Federal Register notice and the SEC's own releases before any client reliance.
…
Notice 2026-62 and Rev. Rul. 2026-20, issued September 28, 2026, target fast-growing fund structures, and the revenue ruling applies at once, so fund counsel and LP clients should check existing positions now.
On September 28, 2026, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2026-62 and Rev. Rul. 2026-20, focusing on a set of investment fund tax strategies that have grown quickly in recent years. According to the Venable summary, the revenue ruling reaches transactions immediately rather than applying only prospectively, a point that matters for clients already holding positions entered into under the older treatment.
Why sophisticated counsel cares: a revenue rule that lands with immediate effect can narrow or eliminate a position that funds, family offices, and institutional LPs treated as settled, and it may cut across structures rather than address a single transaction type. Advisers should expect questions about effective-date mechanics, grandfathering, and any administrative or legislative relief, none of which is confirmed in the available reporting.
…
Two executive orders signed on 29 September 2026 mandate federal use of "Super Intelligence"/"SI" over "AI" and create the SI-enabled America.gov services portal, with a statutory SI definition proposed within 60 days.
On 29 September 2026 the Trump Administration issued two executive orders. The first directs executive departments and agencies, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to substitute "Super Intelligence" (SI) for "artificial intelligence" (AI) in official correspondence, websites, reports and policy documents, reasoning that frontier systems have outrun the original terminology. Existing regulations, contracts and grants need not be revised, and "SI" currently covers the same technologies as the statutory AI definition at 15 U.S.C. § 9401(3) — but the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology must propose legislative language on an SI definition within 60 days, including whether it modifies or supersedes that definition.
The second order establishes America.gov, a conversational federal services portal administered by GSA with OMB and the National Design Studio, integrating Login.gov and covering public-facing services with more than 100,000 annual users. OMB may add or remove covered services by memorandum, and an implementation memorandum is due within 90 days.
…
A September 29 meeting between the President and leading AI developers produced a non-binding "White House Accord on Super Intelligence" on independent model audits, putting audit-ready governance on the near-term agenda.
On September 29, 2026, the President met at the White House with executives from several leading AI developers, and the parties announced a voluntary framework — the "White House Accord on Super Intelligence" — centered on commitments regarding independent AI audits.
Why sophisticated counsel should care: a voluntary federal instrument aimed at frontier-model developers is a signal, not a rule, but commitments of this kind can migrate into hard requirements. Audit language of this sort tends to resurface in procurement clauses, in state AI statutes and their implementation paths, and in enterprise customer diligence, where a counterparty's willingness to submit to third-party model evaluation becomes a contract term. For major-firm clients on both sides of the transaction — labs raising capital, deployers, and vendors — the operative questions are who signed, what "independent audit" is defined to mean (evaluation methodology, access to weights and training data, disclosure of findings), whether findings are public, and what consequences attach to a missed commitment. None of that d
…
SB 1000 significantly reshapes California's framework for labeling and verifying AI-generated content weeks after the California AI Transparency Act took effect, forcing platforms and advertisers to re-map compliance.
California has enacted SB 1000, which according to the reported summary substantially rewrites the state's recently operative AI transparency regime for identifying and verifying AI-generated content. The change lands only weeks after the California AI Transparency Act (CATA), enacted in 2024 via SB 942, took effect — a compressed sequence in which the state's disclosure, provenance and labeling obligations have been adjusted before regulators and industry have settled.
…
The Justice Department's September 18, 2026 revisions to two Justice Manual sections on sub-regulatory guidance and qui tam dismissals signal a changed posture for False Claims Act enforcement and defense.
On September 18, 2026, the Department of Justice announced two revisions to the Justice Manual that, per a law-firm alert, materially affect False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement and defense strategy: one addressing sub-regulatory guidance and the other addressing qui tam dismissals. The excerpt available here does not reproduce the text of the revisions, so the specific new standards, thresholds or procedural rules they impose cannot be characterized from this source alone.
Why it matters: the FCA remains one of the most consequential federal exposure channels for healthcare providers, pharma and device manufacturers, government contractors, and financial-services firms handling federal funds. Changes to how DOJ treats agency sub-regulatory materials, and to the department's handling of relator dismissal requests, bear directly on the strength and litigation posture of FCA claims — and on the settlement leverage of both claimants and respondents. Reported by a single firm alert so far, which suggests early-stage diffusion.
…
On October 1, 2026, DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division issued a new directive on corporate enforcement in fraud cases, signaling how the division intends to prioritize and structure corporate fraud prosecutions and resolutions.
On October 1, 2026, Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald issued Directive 26-12, titled "Corporate Enforcement in the Fight Against Fraud," for the Department of Justice's National Fraud Enforcement Division. Reporting comes from a single law-firm alert, and the specific provisions of the memorandum — its charging, declination, cooperation, or resolution criteria — are not set out in the available material; the directive text should be read in full before any conclusions are drawn about its content or practical effect.
Even with details unconfirmed, a division-wide enforcement directive from the National Fraud Enforcement Division touches the calculus for every major-firm corporate client: how internal investigations are scoped, what preservation and cooperation posture is expected, and when resolution is realistically available. A stated corporate-enforcement framework also typically signals a shift in the division's internal triage and charging decisions, which can matter for parallel regulatory and private exposure.
…
Grade 3 — worth a glance, not the full analysis.
- IRS Backs Tax Treatment of Some Section 351 ETF Conversions, Treasury Widens Review
Treasury and the IRS have taken a further step against tax-aware fund structures, treating certain Section 351 ETF conversions as taxable — a signal that scrutiny of exchange-fund and similar tactics is broadening.
- Argentina Moves on Malvinas/Falklands Offshore Sanctions, Proposed Legislation
King & Spalding reports Milei has announced sanctions and criminal proceedings under Argentina's existing Malvinas/Falklands offshore regime, with proposed legislation raising questions for energy and shipping operators.
- UK employer right to work duties change as 2025 Act provisions bite
A Faegre Drinker client alert sets out the employer compliance changes live in the UK on 1 October 2026 under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025, alongside a new statutory Code of Practice on Preventing Illegal Working.
- California's SB 690 Curbs a Theory of Website-Tracking Liability
A single-source Seyfarth Shaw alert says California has enacted SB 690, narrowing one route to website-tracking liability, but reports related litigation is far from over.
- UK quarterly alert: PIIN averted in Paramount-WBD, DMCCA fast track tested
Akin Gump's Q4 2026 UK update reports no policy shake-up under the new government, the Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery PIIN withdrawn for binding commitments, and Nexfibre/Substantial as an early DMCCA fast-track reference.
- CSBS Releases AI Supervisory Framework for State Financial Regulators
CSBS has published an AI Supervisory Framework to help state regulators map how supervised financial institutions use AI, giving bank counsel an early look at the supervision questions examiners may raise.
- Newsom Signs SB 690, Curbing Web-Tracking Wiretap Claims
California's newly signed SB 690 narrows one private wiretapping theory used against ordinary tracking technologies, but other privacy and consumer claims remain available.
- SEC Qualified Client Proposal Would Widen Performance-Fee Access
A reported SEC proposal would let registered advisers charge performance-based fees to qualified clients, with a narrower carve-out for state oversight that fund counsel should map against existing fee terms and side letters.
- LabCorp to Pay $2.3M in 44-State AG Settlement Over 2019 Data Breach
Connecticut AG William Tong led 44 state attorneys general to a $2.3 million settlement with LabCorp resolving an investigation into the 2019 breach at a LabCorp debt-collection affiliate.
- German Cartel Office overhauls settlement guidance for cartel fine proceedings
Germany's Federal Cartel Office published revised guidance on settlements in cartel fine proceedings on 19 August 2026, replacing its February 2016 version.
- Texas comptroller moves to end sales tax on marketplace fees
On September 30, 2026, Texas Comptroller Don Huffines said he signed an executive order directing his office to propose a Rule 3.330 amendment that would strip marketplace and platform fees out of taxable data processing.
- U.S. Tax Court Announces Venue and Access Procedural Changes
On September 8, 2026, Chief Judge Patrick Urda announced three U.S. Tax Court procedural changes, including five additional places of trial, aimed at broadening taxpayer access and modernizing case administration.
- Second Circuit Weighs in on Limited Partner Self-Employment Tax Exception
A Second Circuit ruling on the self-employment tax treatment of state-law limited partner distributive share income leaves the scope of the exception less settled than before.
- NLRB Reinstates Wright Line Framework for Misconduct During Protected Activity
The Board revived the Wright Line framework for weighing employee misconduct committed during protected union activity, a move employment litigators should track in pending unfair labor practice cases.
- California DFPI seizes state-chartered bank, names FDIC as receiver
The California DFPI took over a state-chartered bank whose financial condition deteriorated and left a March 2026 order unsatisfied, a signal that supervisory pressure on smaller state banks is tightening.
- California AB 1331 Bans Workplace Surveillance in Bathrooms and Off-Duty Areas
Signed by Gov. Newsom, AB 1331 adds Labor Code Part 5.8, effective January 1, 2027, broadly defining workplace surveillance tools and banning monitoring in private spaces, tracking of facility use, and operation during off-duty hours.
- California WVRO Law Expanded for Workplace-Wide Threats, Remote Appearances
AB 1961 lets California employers seek restraining orders for all employees at a worksite without naming a victim (Jan. 1, 2027); AB 2179 mandates remote appearances and e-filing at WVRO hearings (Jan. 1, 2028).
- 25 State AGs Urge Federal AI Rules as Florida Moves Against OpenAI
A New York AG-led coalition of two dozen state attorneys general is pressing Congress to regulate AI, while the Florida AG has asked a court for a temporary injunction against OpenAI.
- USCG Flags Maritime Cyber Intrusion Aboard VLCC Bound for U.S. Gulf Coast
A U.S. Coast Guard assessment of an August 2026 network intrusion on a crude tanker transiting the Mediterranean toward the U.S. Gulf Coast spotlights vessel-cybersecurity compliance exposure.
- NYDFS Sets Examination Expectations for Part 500 Risk Assessments
New York regulator guidance flags common deficiencies in financial services companies' Part 500 cybersecurity risk assessments and shows how examiners will test them.
- Alabama and Kansas AGs announce child online safety settlements with TikTok, Roblox
Two more state AGs report negotiated resolutions with social platforms over child safety claims, extending a pattern of platform-facing enforcement that platform clients should track.
- FDA Opens Applications for Expedited IND Pilot Under TrialBlazer
The FDA is accepting applications for a new Expedited Investigational New Drug pilot program designed to shorten the path from IND-enabling work to trial start, so sponsors should check eligibility and timing.
- DOJ Justice Manual Revision Reshapes False Claims Act Enforcement
Mayer Brown reports that the Department of Justice has revised its Justice Manual to reshape how False Claims Act cases are investigated, prosecuted and resolved.
- S&C Maps Potential 2027 Congressional Investigation Exposure Before Midterms
A Sullivan & Cromwell readiness memo distills current Democratic oversight signals and document demands into a practical exposure-assessment, preservation and witness-preparation exercise for companies with federal touchpoints.
- SEC Corp Fin Staff Release Crypto Asset FAQs on Securities Law Application
The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance staff issued FAQs on September 25, 2026 on how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, giving digital-asset counsel non-binding interpretive guidance to weigh against existing practice.
- US Critical Minerals Defense Waiver Cessation Set for January 1, 2027
A July 2026 executive order directs phased termination of a critical-minerals waiver tied to defense supply chains, with cessation taking effect January 1, 2027; defense and components suppliers should map exposure now.
- CFPB Seeks Comment on Revised Credit Card Data Collection
The CFPB published a request for comment on September 30 proposing revisions to its existing TILA and CARD Act credit card information collection, putting issuers and trade groups on notice of a pending burden estimate.
- House Ways and Means Marks Up Seven Digital Asset Tax Bills
The House Ways and Means Committee marked up a seven-bill digital-asset tax package on Sept. 16, including H.R. 10357, the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act, aimed at clarifying federal tax gray areas for crypto.
- California Codifies Rules on Lawyers' Use of Generative AI, Effective Jan. 1, 2027
California Gov. Newsom signed SB 574 on Sept. 30, 2026, making the state among the first to expressly regulate attorneys' use of generative AI, with the rules taking effect January 1, 2027.
- EDNY Issues Significant Trade Dress Decision in Ice Cream Packaging Dispute
Baker Botts flags an Eastern District of New York ruling in Van Leeuwen Ice Cream v. Rebel Creamery as part of a recent surge in favorable trade dress outcomes; the holding is not described in the source.
- SEC Seeks Comment on Credential-Based 'Accredited Investor' Pathways
The SEC issued notices for public comment on six possible new routes to accredited investor status based on credentials — CPAs, CFAs, CFPs, added FINRA licensees — plus a proposed FINRA "accredited investor exam."
- ICE Revises Form I-9 Inspection Fact Sheet on Audits, Penalties
ICE has again updated its Form I-9 inspection fact sheet, revising audit-trail requirements, warning notices and penalty calculations that shape employer worksite-inspection exposure.
- UK Employment Rights Act: Six-Month Tribunal Limit From 1 October 2026
Most UK employment tribunal claims must now be filed within six months rather than three, for acts, omissions or effective dates of termination on or after 1 October 2026.
- FCA Cryptoasset Authorisation Applications Open 30 September 2026
A law-firm playbook walks through preparing a strong application to the FCA's new UK cryptoasset authorisation regime, with the window running 30 September 2026 to 28 February 2027 ahead of commencement on 25 October 2027.
- FCA updates UK sustainability reporting: SRS alignment and TCFD relief
Hogan Lovells flags FCA moves to align listed issuers' sustainability disclosures with international standards and to simplify TCFD-aligned reporting for asset managers.
- UK Treasury Payments Framework Consultation Closes, Covering Stablecoins
A short-notice HM Treasury consultation on a new UK payments framework is about to close, with firms reported to have roughly six days left to respond, and stablecoins and agentic commerce among the issues raised.
- SEC Staff Statement Reaffirms Fair Value Rules for Private Assets
On September 28, 2026 the SEC's Chief Accountant office and Division of Investment Management issued a joint staff statement reiterating existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for private assets.
- New York justice reported to strike down NYC pied-à-terre tax as challenges mount
Per Hogan Lovells, a New York Supreme Court justice has rejected the city's pied-à-terre tax launched May 28, 2026, with further constitutional challenges said to be mounting.
- New York sues Polymarket over gambling; Kalshi wins Tennessee appeal
New York AG Letitia James and Governor Hochul say they sued QCX LLC d/b/a Polymarket US for running an illegal gambling operation, alongside a reported Tennessee appellate win for Kalshi.
- Court vacates guidance implementing $100,000 H-1B fee; appeals pending
A Northern District of California order bars three agencies from enforcing Proclamation 10973's H-1B fee guidance, while a D.C. court upheld the proclamation, leaving employers in split appellate litigation.
- Senate Advances Protect College Sports Act 77-22
Senate passed the Protect College Sports Act 77-22 on September 28, granting athletic associations broad antitrust protection and eligibility limits, but House passage is uncertain and student-athlete employee status is left unsettled.
- IRS Flags 351 Exchanges Into ETFs and Other Fund Strategies as Abusive
A Mayer Brown alert reports the IRS is scrutinising "351 conversion" transactions and other ETF and investment-fund structures as potentially abusive, a signal tax counsel should watch for follow-on guidance.
- AG Kokott Backs Annulment of Pharma, Cosmetics Wastewater Cost Rules
AG Kokott's Opinion in Case C-193/25 would annul key parts of Directive (EU) 2024/3019, which required pharmaceutical and cosmetics producers to fund at least 80% of advanced wastewater treatment costs.
- Paul Hastings maps midterm-driven congressional oversight risk for financial firms
Prospective alert says a Democratic House majority would turn minority inquiry letters into subpoena-backed scrutiny of banks, fintechs and broker-dealers.
- CFTC Staff Advisory 26-27 Maps Prediction Market Rules for Event Contracts
The CFTC's Division of Market Oversight issued Staff Advisory No. 26-27 on prediction market contracts referencing individual conduct, its most detailed guidance yet on the category.
- In re Cellect and Allergan sharpen double patenting in term adjustment
A Baker Botts analysis of In re Cellect and Allergan v. MSN asks whether an obviousness-type double patenting rejection can now rest solely on the risk of a later patent term adjustment.
- Ninth Circuit Rejects Programmers' DMCA Claim in Doe v. GitHub
The Ninth Circuit held that software programmers failed to state a DMCA claim over removal of copyright management information, a ruling copyright and AI counsel will read closely.
- Steel Producer Forum Adopts Framework on Global Excess Capacity
On September 30, 2026, the Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity adopted a Comprehensive Framework for Joint Action on global steel overcapacity, a signal for future trade-remedy debates.
- D.C. Circuit vacates Copyright Royalty Board 2014-2017 rate allocations
The D.C. Circuit has vacated the Copyright Royalty Board's allocation of statutory royalties for 2014 through 2017 and remanded for further explanation.
- EU pharma law package nears completion; compounding rules in focus
Hogan Lovells notes the EU overhaul of Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation 726/2004 is nearing legislative completion, with hospital compounding implications for marketing-authorisation holders.
- SEC Filer Status Proposal Draws Comment on Scope and Form Structure
A client alert surveys themes emerging in public comment on the SEC's May 2026 proposal to restructure how issuers determine filer status and the reporting and disclosure obligations that follow.
- OSHA Fact Sheet Backs Workplace Naloxone Without New Mandate
OSHA's Sept. 24, 2026 fact sheet urges employers to keep opioid antagonists on site and train staff, but imposes no new compliance duty — while New York and California enact binding requirements.
- EBA Finalizes Third-Party Risk Guidelines Replacing 2019 Outsourcing Rules
The European Banking Authority published final Guidelines on sound management of third-party risk (EBA/GL/2026/09) on 18 September 2026, superseding its 2019 outsourcing guidelines.
- FTC and state AGs settle pesticide antitrust case with Corteva
The FTC and a coalition of state attorneys general settled federal and state antitrust and consumer-protection allegations that Corteva's loyalty program discouraged distributors from carrying rivals' products; terms are not detailed.
- Federal bill targets management services organization structures in medicine
Newly introduced HR 10444 would curb physician-friendly management services organization models, signaling rising federal scrutiny of MSO arrangements.
- SEC Proposes Tailored Crypto Custody Rules for Advisers and Funds
The SEC proposed rules tailoring crypto-asset custody for registered advisers, funds and BDCs, in a day that also brought a new SEC exam handbook and a CFTC Brexit no-action extension.
- CFTC Staff Grants No-Action Relief to Passive Software Providers
The CFTC staff issued no-action relief confirming that passive software providers facilitating access to CFTC-regulated derivatives need not register as introducing brokers if they meet stated conditions.
- Delaware court extends Hikma inducement standard to labels without carve-outs
The District of Delaware, in an early post-Hikma life sciences decision reported by Polsinelli, held that its affirmative-conduct test for induced infringement applies even where the accused generic filer copies the full reference label.
- USPTO Director Explains Denial of Biocon PGR on Regeneron's EYLEA Patent
The Director issued a written opinion on September 24, 2026 explaining why post-grant review petition PGR2026-00039, which Biocon filed against Regeneron's U.S. Patent No. 12,168,036, was not instituted.
- Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of DMCA CMI claims over AI coding tools
The Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of DMCA claims that AI code-writing tools stripped copyright management information, narrowing a theory increasingly used against generative AI developers.
- NY personnel-records access law takes effect Nov. 8, 2026
Beginning November 8, 2026, all New York employers must give current and former employees access to their personnel records and respond within 10 days when negative information is added to a file.
- Proposed Expansion of Accredited Investor Definition for Natural Persons
Mayer Brown flags a U.S. proposal to broaden who counts as an accredited investor as a natural person — a consultation point for counsel advising issuers and funds on exempt-offering eligibility.
- California SB 951 Adds AI-Disclosures to Cal-WARN Layoff Notices
Effective January 1, 2027, SB 951 requires Cal-WARN notices to disclose layoffs caused "in whole or in substantial part" by AI or other automated technology, leaving thresholds, the 60-day notice period, and penalties unchanged.
- California Delays Stay or Pay Law, Adds Changes via AB 1697
Newsom signed AB 1697, delaying the effective date of California's Stay or Pay law (Bus. & Prof. Code § 16608; Lab. Code § 926) and making further changes, so employers and plaintiffs' counsel must re-map enforceability timing.
- Japan June 2026 AGM season: 106 listed firms draw shareholder proposals
White & Case's tally puts the number of Japanese listed companies receiving shareholder proposals at 106 in June 2026, near the prior-year record, as institutional and activist demands skew toward governance.
- California Delays Stay-or-Pay Ban to Jan. 1, 2027, Adds Exemptions
AB 1697, signed Sept. 30, 2026, moves California's AB 692 repayment-clause limits to contracts made on or after Jan. 1, 2027, erases 2026 liability and adds narrow bonus, retention and PTO exemptions.