DROPLETS

On September 28, 2026, Treasury and the IRS issued paired guidance on gain-deferral strategies built around ETFs. Revenue Ruling 2026-20 denies nonrecognition under section 351 where an investor contributes an appreciated, diversified portfolio to a newly formed ETF and, under a common plan, those securities are distributed to an authorized participant in redemption of AP shares under section 852(b)(6). Following Kuper v. Commissioner, the Commissioner treats the arrangement as a taxable exchange under section 1001 — and sets no holding period, so a redemption long after contribution may be recharacterized if both steps implement one plan.

…

On September 30, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit revived a putative securities fraud class action against Ocugen, Inc., a publicly traded pharmaceutical company, holding that a stock's rapid price recovery after corrective disclosure is not automatically dispositive of materiality. Read together with the PSLRA pleading framework, the ruling signals that a defendant's best evidence of immateriality — a short-lived price drop — will not, standing alone, support dismissal at the pleading stage.

For defense-side securities class action counsel, the decision matters because materiality and loss causation are frequently litigated together on Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 23 motions in cases touching biopharma, where disclosure disputes over trial data, timelines, and regulatory expectations are common. It also undercuts early-motion practice built around post-disclosure price stabilization charts, which opposing counsel can now characterize as insufficient without additional evidence tying specific statements to investor reliance and price impact.

…

On October 9, 2026, the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control issued General License No. 135, described as authorizing transactions related to the sale, delivery, offloading and importation of diesel fuel of Russian origin. The license appears to be a temporary, window-based authorization rather than a broader lifting of measures, and the underlying alert text available to us is truncated, so the precise scope of covered parties, volumes, counterparties and the expiry date should be confirmed against the license and any accompanying FAQs before reliance.

…

California has enacted three laws directly regulating employer use of artificial intelligence and automated tools in the employment relationship, reaching layoffs, workplace monitoring, discipline and termination. According to Seyfarth Shaw's October 12, 2026 analysis, the package moves well past the California Consumer Privacy Act's automated decisionmaking technology regime, which had been framed primarily around consumer-facing data processing rather than management decisions about people at work. CCPA's ADMT obligations largely attached to processing personal information; these new statutes reach the manner in which employment decisions are made and documented.

…

On September 30, 2026, the SEC proposed a package of rulemakings it describes as expanding "responsible retailization of private markets." According to the reporting available, the proposals taken together would broaden the ability of registered investment advisers to receive compensation in connection with private-market investments — the piece that matters most, because adviser fee arrangements sit at the center of retail-access initiatives and have been the principal sticking point for fund managers seeking broader distribution.

…

The Federal Reserve’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new version of the “Concentrations of Credit” booklet on 30 September 2026, replacing the prior version 2.0 and rescinding Bulletin 2020‑90. The updated guidance brings securitizations and correlated exposures under tighter concentration limits and clarifies how to calculate risk-weighted assets for such assets. Banks must reassess their credit concentration reporting, adjust risk‑management frameworks, and update internal control documentation to reflect the new correlation assumptions. Failure to comply could lead to increased capital requirements and supervisory scrutiny. Firms advising banks should review client portfolios for securitized and highly correlated assets, quantify potential new concentration limits, and help clients adjust risk models and capital plans accordingly. Banks should convene their risk officers by mid‑October to model the adjustments.

Treasury has issued the first enforcement penalty under its Outbound Investment Security Program, according to a Latham & Watkins alert. The source does not identify the penalized party, the transaction, the amount, or any covered technology sector, so those specifics should be treated as unconfirmed.

Why it matters: the program created a new prohibitions-and-notification framework for certain U.S. investor activity involving covered foreign technology. Until now, counsel have advised clients mainly on compliance design — covered-list mapping, diligence standards, recordkeeping — against the prospect of enforcement. A first penalty converts that theoretical risk into demonstrated risk, and the alert frames the action as evidence that Treasury is actively monitoring cross-border investment flows.

…

On October 7, 2026, the US Department of the Treasury announced its first civil penalty under the Outbound Investment Security Program, fining a US company $200,000 for failing to notify Treasury of a $92,478 investment. The company is not named in the reporting reviewed here, and the identity of the investor or recipient is not established in the available material.

The significance is procedural rather than monetary. Until now, OISP has functioned largely as a filing regime: covered US persons must notify Treasury of certain investments into entities in covered countries involving sensitive technology, and the program has carried reputational and disclosure consequences without a demonstrated penalty precedent. A first enforcement action supplies the missing compliance signal about how Treasury calculates, documents, and resolves violations — including whether resolution depends on the size of the underlying deal, the diligence actually performed, or the timeliness of self-reporting.

…

On October 1, 2026, Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald, who leads DOJ's National Fraud Enforcement Division, issued Directive 26-12, titled "Corporate Enforcement in the Fight Against Fraud," according to a Holland & Knight alert. The law firm's analysis frames the directive as a signal that FDA-regulated industries may face enhanced scrutiny.

Why it matters: a division-level enforcement directive typically signals where charging, settlement, or pilot activity is being prioritized, and it can affect how targets are selected, how cooperation and self-disclosure are credited, and what remediation or compliance expectations attach to resolution. For pharmaceutical, device, and other regulated manufacturers, the practical consequence is a higher probability that marketing, reimbursement, safety-reporting, or promotional conduct is examined through a fraud lens — areas where the FDA's own compliance regime already sits.

…

The Treasury, together with the IRS, released Revenue Procedure 2026‑20 on October 6, 2026 to amend the safe‑harbor framework for investment and grantor trusts staking digital assets. Key changes include: recognition of delegated staking without ownership transfer; a protocol‑specific threshold for compromising consensus; removal of an SEC‑approval filing requirement in favor of registration‑statement disclosure; allowance for multiple custodians; clarified indemnification for slashing losses; and permissive treatment of staking rewards—whether new coins or transaction fees—as either cash or in‑kind distributions. The guidance also eliminates a borrowing‑based contingent‑liquidity exception and reduces the grace period for implementing the safe‑harbor from nine to six months, with an additional six‑month extension for trusts already compliant. Firms advising trusts engaged in digital‑asset staking must review trust agreements and operational processes to ensure compliance, assess custodial arrangements, and update disclosure language. Clients should monitor whether the SEC adopts the

…

On October 1, the SEC proposed a package of rules and amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 establishing what the agency describes as a "tailored framework" for crypto asset custody by registered advisers and funds. Per the summary available here, the proposal would permit adviser self-custody of client digital assets and would recognize state trust companies as qualified custodians, with corresponding implications for fund custody arrangements.

…

The 24 September 2026 French Ministry of the Economy and Treasury report details a record 418 FDI filings in 2025, up 16 % from 2023, with 48 % deemed out‑of‑scope and almost half of approvals (49 %) carrying conditions. Investors, especially in agri‑food, renewables and software, should now factor in potential operational and governance constraints that can early‑stage decisions. The French authorities’ expanded preliminary‑assessment process—which 72 % of cases turned out to be outside scope—offers a key compliance tool for mitigating over‑filing. Moreover, a 2026 decree extends the 10 % voting‑rights threshold to French‑listed companies on certain non‑EU exchanges, tightening controls on minority stakes. Across the EU, the new Foreign Investment Screening Regulation, effective January 2028, will harmonise scopes and timelines, broadening review to dual‑use items, electoral infrastructure and financial services. Firms should re‑evaluate cross‑border M&A plans now, use preliminary assessments, and monitor for impending EU compliance as France aligns its domestic regime with the fort

…

On October 8, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would impose significant new fees on schools that recommend F-1 students for Optional Practical Training, according to Seyfarth Shaw. The reported framing — unprecedented fees tied to the school recommendation step — points at the link between institutions and students rather than at employer sponsor filings.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: OPT is the standard post-graduation work authorization for a large share of international students, and the school recommendation is the entry point to that process. A fee imposed at the school level could raise the cost of advising and nominating students, complicate recruiting and matriculation decisions for institutions, and add planning burden for employers that sponsor OPT participants alongside universities. It also lands amid a policy environment of heightened scrutiny of the student visa pathway. Because this is a proposal rather than a final rule, comment timing, fee mechanics and any litigation are the variables to track; the no

…

FinCEN announced on October 5 that it is withdrawing two pending proposals outstanding since 2023: a special measure aimed at convertible virtual currency (CVC) mixing services, which would have extended BSA/AML obligations to certain mixing and forwarding activities, and a proposed rule imposing risk-based requirements on financial institutions for transactions involving unhosted wallets. According to the firm alert, the agency weighed public comments and concluded withdrawal was appropriate; the underlying CVC mixer designation and related Treasury actions were not described as being reversed.

Why counsel should care: both proposals sat on bank and fintech compliance roadmaps and shaped product design, customer due diligence, travel-rule implementations, vendor contracting and internal audit scoping for US financial institutions. Their removal narrows anticipated obligations and reduces the case for building wallet-attribute and virtual-currency analytics ahead of a final rule, though it does not disturb existing BSA, CIP, MSB registration or state-level requirements.

…

Germany has completed a sweeping reform of its product liability regime to give effect to Directive (EU) 2024/2853, according to a Hogan Lovells alert; the new framework is reported to apply from 9 December 2026, and expressly extends liability beyond physical goods to software and AI-related products.

Why sophisticated counsel should care: the change closes what has long been a coverage gap for pure-software and model-driven products, which many manufacturers, SaaS vendors and AI developers assumed fell outside traditional defect-based regimes. That shifts exposure analysis, indemnity drafting, insurance purchasing, contractual limitation-of-liability strategy and disclosure obligations for companies selling AI-enabled products into German law from late 2026 — and, because the underlying directive harmonises standards, it also shapes litigation exposure across other member states.

…

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) released the first version of a FAQ on tokenisation of investment funds, clarifying how Luxembourg undertakings for collective investment (UCIs) may issue native tokenised shares on distributed ledgers while complying with existing legal frameworks, anti‑money laundering (AML) requirements, and the Dematerialised Securities Law. The document highlights that tokenised units can be registered or dematerialised and stresses a technology‑neutral stance. It also details notification timelines for control‑agent activities, including ICT outsourcing, and emphasizes conformity with the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) for critical functions. Firms with tokens now or planning to tokenise should review their UCI or IFM structures, confirm registrar obligations, assess DORA compliance, and engage early with CSSF’s Innovation Hub. The FAQ is subject to updates; entities should monitor the CSSF site for changes.

Early October brought two CFTC crypto rulemakings, two FinCEN withdrawals and several prediction-markets litigation moves. An Oct. 5 ANPRM seeks comment on "fit-for-purpose" CEA rules for retail leveraged or margined crypto agreements, floats a "crypto asset market" DCM subcategory, and tentatively reads "actual delivery" under Section 2(c)(2)(D) as wallet transfer rather than book transfer. An Oct. 9 NPRM would expressly define event contracts — sports, politics, cultural, weather — as swaps, while a same-day interim final rule codifies the exclusion of casino-style gambling products; a time-limited no-action letter separately lets DCMs convert broad-based index futures into true perpetuals. FinCEN withdrew its 2020 unhosted wallet recordkeeping proposal and 2023 mixer Section 311 proposal, citing comments, deregulatory priorities and impractical compliance burdens. On litigation, 39 states and D.C. sought certiorari in the New Jersey sports-event preemption case, a CFTC-registered intermediary appealed a Connecticut injunction denial to the Second Circuit with CFTC support, and an

…

On 6 October 2026, EIOPA published a Supervisory Statement on the Authorisation and Ongoing Supervision of (Re)insurance Undertakings Related to Private Equity, according to Skadden's report; the available extract does not reproduce the statement's specific supervisory expectations, so those should be read in the original text before being relied on.

Supervisory statements of this kind are directed at national competent authorities rather than being directly binding law, but they shape supervisory practice across the member states. That makes the statement a directional signal on how private equity ownership, control and funding of insurers and reinsurers is expected to be assessed — a live issue as sponsors acquire or build insurance platforms and as reinsurance capacity becomes an acquisition target.

…

On October 7, 2026 the SEC issued a Section 21(a) report of investigation — its first in eight years — examining coordinated institutional-investor activity, focusing on Climate Action 100+ and the 2021 ExxonMobil proxy contest. Although the Commission declined enforcement on the conduct then known, it signalled that group status under Section 13(d) can be established by circumstantial evidence: coordinated voting, harmonized evaluation frameworks, negative publicity or client pressure campaigns, and membership coupled with commitments to align. Express disclaimers of coordination, the report says, are not dispositive; what matters is actual conduct and whether independence policies are implemented and enforced.

…